Amoeba_Girl

joined 2 years ago
[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 11 points 3 days ago

The thing is, the world in 1984 is feminist! as imagined by a bloke who hates feminism. Sex for pleasure is outlawed, makeup and dresses are banned, women look and act like men (and indeed are worse than men) instead of following their womanly nature. It's a feminist dystopia!

I mean, if god damned Asimov thinks your book is misogynistic, you know you've fucked up!

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't think I disagree with much of what Asimov is saying here! Aside from the silly bits about left infighting and scifi as forecasting (yawn), and the horrible recount of the Spanish civil war, I've made pretty much the same observations about 1984. It's nihilistic and reactionary, it's profoundly misogynistic and it reeks of contempt for the working class. It's also shockingly naive and paradoxically enthusiastic about the workings and effectiveness of propaganda and censorship. There's certainly nothing prescient about it. It's baffling to me that it's still popular with leftleaning people to this day.

The most generous thing I can say is that the book might have been intended purely as satire, and as such it would at least be coherent. But sadly I don't think this is how people tend to read it.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

yup this is pretty much what happens when you grind books for xp instead of actually reading them

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

some important characters in the narrative I've completely skipped over, mostly to do with the Nature of Art (in society) subplot, because nothing actually happens in them and it's all social parties and talking

you ... mother ... fucker ... so not only did you manage to miss the fact that this is a gay book, you completely skipped past one if not the most important theme in the novel which is language and the way people talk and write and the various ways they conduct themselves in different times and places, but oh nothing happens it's just people talking aaaaaaaaaa

also this is a funny book! it's funny! it's not all maudlin meditations upon time and memory! fuck you!

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

warming up on philosophy with Simulacra and Simulation

oh no baby what are you doing

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 6 points 4 days ago (5 children)
[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago

Ugh, yeah, as I though then. Eliezer going for the conspiracy theory to euphemise the real abuse is a perfect illustration of why I really really can't stand the general discourse around the Epstein files.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Huh. I don't like to look into Epstein stuff too much because it's such a mess of creepy speculation, I know there are "recordings" but is it actually established that he used them for extortion? Compared to like, the very well documented sex crimes?

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 7 points 6 days ago

If I understand correctly, the only reason they're in such low orbit, and thus why there needs to be so fucking many of them, is to have much lower latency compared to geostationary satellites. You know, in case you need to play Quake on your satellite connection.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

Nah, I'm not sure how much he was into eugenics (he was at the very least definitely in favour of killing invalid children), but grandiose and incoherent reactionary aristocratic bullshit is a 100% valid reading of Nietzsche.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm sorry but whatever you think about the actual content I'm going to be prescriptive and proclaim that the word manifesto should not be allowed to refer to opinions about management practices.

view more: next ›