this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
237 points (98.4% liked)

politics

25696 readers
3201 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump is willing to sacrifice Alaska and Ukraine just so people aren't focused on Trump being a fucking pedophile.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 123 points 1 month ago (6 children)

so putin fighting against ukraine for territory means america is surrendering. wut?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lol, he's offering Russia part of Ukraine AND America now, while buying right into Russia's propaganda that Alaska should belong to Russia too?

Even though we could literally kick Russia out whenever we wanted with adequate military aid.

What a weak little bitch.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

Everything makes sense if you begin all conversations assuming he's a russian asset.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

The art of the deal!

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

Krasnov hopes to please Putin at his performance review.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Shut up! This is what WINNING looks like! /s

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There is genuinely a world where "Why do you keep going to war? Fear of a lack of resources? Let's make a deal to prioritize some paid contracts to you so that we can create an economic dependence and have a bigger lever the next time you are a dumb shit" is the outcome and... that would be a genuinely beautiful outcome and a long term solution to putin. Yes, it is rewarding "bad behavior". But anything short of a full military occupation AND continued occupation (rather than leaving a puppet regime to get taken out by insurrection five minutes after we leave) is just kicking the can down the road.

But this is trump and he has never found a business he couldn't bankrupt. So just give strong daddy putin the state that sort of limits his actions and all the resources in exchange for... turning Ukraine into Gaza.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make America Russia Again?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago
[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 57 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wait, he was willing to take Greenland by force for their resources, and now he's giving up America's?? Was he just planning on turning Greenland over to Putin in the first place?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 22 points 1 month ago

Was he just planning on turning Greenland over to Putin in the first place?

Shipping/ocean-going routes, yes. He was.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

He just wants to make sure all the world’s resources are being exploited by someone—he doesn’t care who.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 46 points 1 month ago
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He’s really going all in on distracting from Epstein.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Nobody will be talking about what I did last night if I just walk in and shit my pants

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Pweeeeease stop the war. I'll give you stuff to stop the war.

Weakling bitch.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Fuck no.

In a less broken society, Trump would be on trial right now for treason.

[–] canajac@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

He's going to give Alaska back to Russia and apologize for buying it for 4 million because the then pres was a dem.

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OK so... Not that its stopped him before, but can he legally do this? Is this within the powers of the presidency?

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nope. Congress does. But we know Congress is weak, compromised, and ineffectual at this point.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

So, that means Putin has copies of the Epstein Papers and recordings to blackmail Trump with? It's ALL about the Epstein Papers.

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Maybe he wants Russia's help taking over Canada. You know, get them to play bad cop so Trump can play good cop offering protection, for a price.

It's a nice country you've got there; it'd be a shame if it were invaded by those Russians at the border...

[–] loweffortname@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay. I've seen links to this a few times now...

Didn't we buy Alaska from Russia? (Yes we did)

This is either the weirdest case of buyer's remorse, or yet another ginned up controversy.

[–] Prancingpotato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Hey, should France join some kind of war to ask for Louisiana ?

[–] datalowe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

What is with this article? I've read previous pravda UA articles that were good, but this one just seems like something an LLM spat out after being asked to summarize the cited Telegraph article. There is no additional context offered, everything is in this list-like/chopped up format, and the last subheading ("conclusion" I presume) seems to have been left in Ukrainian or Russian (I can't read either). At least one quote wasn't even properly attributed to anyone. My guess then is that it's just a direct copy-paste of an LLM response. I hope this is just a single "journalist" not doing their job rather than a trend at the outlet.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

They keep saying these things are a distraction. From what? Not like the american public is doing anything notably effective otherwise.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Trump could chortle Putins shrivelled ball sack any harder, he’d probably be sent back in time to the 1980’s when he was recruited as a Russian spy.

Jesus Fucking Christ Americans are weak.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Ah, Pravda. Pravda is like FOX News Russia for the uninitiated.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

You may want to check that TLD again.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Wrong Pravda bud. This is the Ukrainian one.