this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
674 points (99.3% liked)

News

31665 readers
1858 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ten years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights to same-sex couples nationwide, the justices this fall will consider for the first time whether to take up a case that explicitly asks them to overturn that decision.

Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for six days in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to a gay couple on religious grounds, is appealing a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys fees.

In a petition for writ of certiorari filed last month, Davis argues First Amendment protection for free exercise of religion immunizes her from personal liability for the denial of marriage licenses.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 44 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You work for the government, you are acting as the government, paid for by taxes from your constituents.

You do not get to decide which laws to follow. Fuck off Kim.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

She has no reason to speak of morals when you look at how poorly she practices what she screeches.

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 61 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What a horrible, terrible, evil piece of shit of a person. A lot of people serve other people they don't like every day, it's called having a fucking job, no need to make a federal fucking case out of it you stupid selfish childish pious asshole.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I worked in retail and there was this one idiot that ended up getting fired because he couldn't get over his racism. He was moaning about immigrants on Facebook afterwards. He didn't lose his job to immigrants, he lost his job because he was being rude to Asian people who definitely weren't interested in his job, as they almost certainly already had better paying once.

These people are their own worst enemies.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

Not ”a lot people," literally EVERYBODY has to deal with people they don't like, every single fucking day.

What's with these MAGAs, who are so entitled they think the entire world owes them a life without anything slightly unpleasant crossing their paths, or they will KILL YOU?

[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My reaction as well. I was just fine living out the rest of my life, not having to see that smugshot again. But here we are.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yooooo.... This bitch is still doing the same, heinous shit? A decade later? Why don't these pieces of shit just get fucking lives or hobbies or something? They're like goddamned ghouls, hanging around and smelling of shit. Like. Fuck. GO AWAY.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Methinks she’s being funded by those organizations.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

This has the particular stink of Citizens United for sire.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 6 days ago

"Davis said she's been "called Hitler, I’ve been called [a] hypocrite, I’ve been called a homophobe."

"I’ve been called things and names that I didn’t even say when I was in the world. Those names don’t hurt me," Davis said. "What probably hurt me the worst is when someone tells me that my God does not love me or that my God is not happy with me, that I am a hypocrite of a Christian.""

Lmao, so you don't mind being called Hitler, but being called a fake Christian - now that's insulting! Tells you everything you need to know

[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can we get someone who believes in Jakub elected as county clerk somewhere in the US South? Then they can deny marriage licenses to all the white people for being inhuman.

I can't wait until Clarence Thomas decides in favor of legislation that bans interracial marriages. I can't wait!

Spy magazine back in the early '90s ran a great cartoon captioned "Clarence Thomas greets the morning" which showed him on his front porch bending down to pick up the newspaper next to a negro stable boy lawn statue.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So could she have refused to serve a black person or an Asian person based on her personal religious views that she doesn't like black or Asian people?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Like we're not going to see interracial marriage struck down after they do away with the filthy, eeevil gaysex.

Mark my words, it will be under the guise of "national security" and it will start with a big spiel from the administration how "terrorists" are getting into the country by marrying "US citizens" (even though imgiration hasn't worked that way in like, a century) and they will swear it's not about race... while using race to identify these scary terrorists who want to eat your children and rape your pets.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We won't, but for specific, self-serving reasons.

In his opinion for Dobbs, Thomas listed several cases he wants to revisit, including Obergefell. Notably absent was Loving, which is the case that set interracial marriage in stone. Thing is, if you follow his reasoning, Loving should fall to the exact same logic. The fact that he left it out is telling.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't believe for a moment that everything isn't on the table for repeal, destruction or revocation. It just takes a phone call and a new boat and Thomas will not just revisit Loving, he and his cohorts will use it like toilet paper overnight. They just can't move too fast, they have to give the population time to adapt to changes or wait until everyone is too distracted by some manufactured crisis. Literally, our only hope is they misjudge or move too fast and create an actual armed movement marching on Washington. (Like, they would need some kind of huge army deployed to DC to protect the president and cabinet and courts in that case... can you imagine that?)

And it doesn't matter if Thomas is in an interracial marriage, the ruling class has proven time and time again they are immune to consequence and law.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I'd love to see Clarence Thomas go home to his ugly bulldog white wife, and explain that he voted to abolish their marriage, and now that it's an official abomination, she must move out of the house immediately.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

In her mind, she does.

[–] Skanky@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Can we just take a minute to appreciate how much forehead she has? She could star in the next Coneheads movie!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Classic hillbilly genes, caused by generations of pickling their chromosomes in rotgut moonshine.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

She certainly looks like the type of person that gets upset when other people are having fun. Not very conelike to me unfortunately. Narfle the Garthak!

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

This would then apply to all religions, correct?

She is so messed up. Religious marriage is separate from state licensing of relationships. Religion can discriminate away, but the state serves all its people.

She can't argue she was acting on behalf of the state, and literally says it was based on her personal beliefs how can she then argue she has no personal liability?

I think that firing her would have been the better answer though, if she won't do the job then fire her and hire someone without a conflict.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And this Ladys and Gentlr-people is, why LGB without the T is simply shooting in your own foot. First they go for trans people, but republicans will not stop there. They want to see all of the LGBTQ community dead or at least completely stripped of their rights and hiding at home. Just because you fought with the Republicans to make the life for trans people hell that doesn't mean, that you aren't next.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

And the next one is removing rights from women. And up next, slavery 2: Orange Boogaloo...

What the actual fuck America.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›