Benj Edwards, one of the authors of the offending article, has posted an explanation, taking the blame and clearing his co-author.
ryper
Benj Edwards handles most of their AI coverage. I wouldn't take his use of AI as a sign of what the rest of the staff is doing.
Good news (from December):
“Absolutely,” [Bryan] Fuller told The Mary Sue recently about wanting to revisit Pushing Daisies. “We have a season three pitch, and the entire cast wants to come back, and we’re hoping we get to return to them. We just have to find somebody who wants to make it.”
Ars Technica has published a retraction
edit: Benj Edwards, the author responsible, has posted his side. tl;dr: He was sick and he messed up, and he asked for the article to be pulled because he was too sick to fix it right away.
The Palantir connection isn't the only bad bit here:
Sure enough, Discord's support article describing its age verification process now features a disclaimer informing UK users that they "may be part of an experiment where your information will be processed by an age-assurance vendor, Persona." And while Discord had previously insisted that facial age verification recordings would only be stored and processed locally, the notice about Persona says that "the information you submit will be temporarily stored for up to 7 days, then deleted."
They tried so hard to convince people the verification would be safe, and they're already experimenting with making it less safe.
Benj and Kyle were the authors of the article; Dan's name wasn't on it.
I don't see how appointing judges who'll rule that Trump didn't break the law helps anything.
FEMA is part of DHS.
this was 8 years ago
COVID wasn't even a thing 8 years ago...
Nominees for the job require Senate approval, so technically they could try to make Trump put up someone good. Bondi was nominated when it turned out the Senate wasn't likely to approve Trump's first pick, Matt Gaetz.
Since the summary doesn't say which three popular password managers: