NewNewAugustEast

joined 3 days ago
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Scrambled: low heat...

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There are sites that track this information or you can use the way back machine. IRC is a quarter or less of what it used to be in say 2005-2010.

That is real data.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

sms is not even an option for us; international texting costs a lot. Some people don't even use a phone, they rely on internet connected devices only. Trying to coordinate all of this gets complicated fast.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

That too, the number of users is way down.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (5 children)

Well no they are not. Netsplit follows IRC and tracks users and IRC servers. You can watch the decline over time. Quakenet alone had nearly 200,000 monthly active user alone back in 2005.

The split of freenode, the technical abilities of people, and the lack of a easy to use mobile client all made people turn away from IRC. Factor in discord and Reddit and you lose even more.

The number of servers from 2005 to today has dropped also. From 3500 to about a thousand.

I love IRC, but it has been on a decline for a long time. Particularly if you factor in the number of online users today versus back then in general. The percentage of them that uses IRC or even knows what it is, is much smaller.

I suppose you could argue that unpublished networks, onion sites, and other IRC outside of mainstream exist, but how many users do they have?

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Did you get everyone to settle on the same thing, like Signal? We are spread out over about 8 countries, and with all the different phone numbers and plans, we use various methods, with several of us on Signal. Some on whatsapp, some on messenger. So we are not coordinated enough for a group chat. Which is fine, I dont really need to know everything all the time, we catch up when can, or get into small video chats occasionally. Luckily we do tend to physically see each other somewhat frequently.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

This seems silly. Lots of kids never learned about computers even when they were available. A chromebook was just an electronic school aid. If the interest was in computers they would learn about computers.

I think this is a fairly dumb take. In the schools that I saw that had chromebooks a kid might be taking English, Math, AND computing. It really was up to the school (and parents) to introduce computing, not the machine that was the general replacement for books.

Anecdotally: a high school near us requires every student to have a computer. They do not hand out chromebooks and the requirement specs are a higher end Mac or PC laptop that the kids are required to bring to classes. These kids use blender, maya 3d, office suite, video and music editing software for example. They absolutely do not know any more about computers then chromebook kids (with a few exceptions). Having access to a computer doesnt magically make them know about how computers work.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Go look at the major irc chat hosts. Add up daily users. Then compare that number to the estimated users in 2005-10.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Lemmy isn't social. It's just forums aggregated. One could use it as a social app, and some people do, but it really is not necessary or even really welcomed.

I have seen estimates of a reduction of 50 to 75 percent in the number of forums over the last 15 years. There are certainly a lot less. People go to reddit or discord these days.

Same with IRC but the decline is even higher.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I would rather SMS than use WhatsApp. But even then if my family is far away, why am texting them at all very often? With the time zone differences I'll call or email, or nothing. It's weird how people got along just fine with letters that took weeks and suddenly we now need instant communication for some reason?

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (8 children)

They live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant

Signal is free just like whats app. For text, calls, and video. So that isn't a problem.

I too have friends and family in different countries, one of which is crazy about whatsapp. I simply tell them this is how we are going to do things now, and walk them through it. It is not hard. If they can't do it, well then we don't need to communicate this way. Whatsapp is not an option. It is that simple.

They live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant

Signal is free just like whats app. For text, calls, and video.

view more: next ›