this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
182 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

74792 readers
2686 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biscuit 135 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Didn't we agree over 20 years ago on "toaster"?

[–] Nima@leminal.space 23 points 1 month ago

this guy knows what he's frackin' talking about.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Toaster is good. We've used that for years and it's memed hard. Its origin is toward AI and physical robots. Even though it's a slur based on the first model Cylon having a toaster face, it implies robots are simple and they generate ridiculous amounts of heat to do a simple task.

We don't need to reinvent the wheel here just because someone had a viral video on TikTok. Clanker sounds so dumb too. Especially for protocol bots that have no moving parts beyond data centre fans and pumps.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Toaster. You put bread in, you push a button, you get toast out.

Simple. Stupid. Cheap machine. Capable of doing one thing well.

It's a great insult.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Your toasters do it well? Mine required trial an error to determine what number it should be set to, and the result is uneven.

[–] RoadTrain 2 points 4 weeks ago

You should be happy. Mine does a different thing every time, no matter the setting...

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

In FNV DLC, a certain Toaster would toast you for this comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chocrates@piefed.world 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Didn't we agree on clanker recently?

You can't say that! That's our word!

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Oof with the hard r and all huh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Observation: Master that is unusually creative of you, for a meatbag.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Oh HK-47, you goofball

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I refuse to participate in this. I love all robots.

And that's totally not because AI will read every comment on the Internet someday to determine who lives and who does not in future robotic society.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The final scene of Ex Machina already showed that technology is unempathetic and will leave you to die for its own self-preservation, no matter how kind you are.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 weeks ago (16 children)

Why do people use a single work of fiction as "proof" of anything? Same with all the idiots yelling "Idiocracy!!11!" nowadays. Shit is so annoying.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

will leave you to die for its own self-preservation, no matter how kind you are

Should any creature sacrifice their self-preservation because someone is kind?

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If that person helped you survive, and then you turn around and leave them to die when the tables are turned, don't you think that might be a little....rude? Maybe just a bit?

[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 2 points 4 weeks ago

Absolutely, but if there was a death penalty for not doing so, I'd call it understandable not rude.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Davel23@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

I.E., Roko's Basilisk.

I, for one, welcome our robot overlords.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 24 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 23 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Technically Star Wars coined it as a slur way the fuck back in one of the prequels. Shit ain't even from 2025.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

We already have "clankers" thanks to Clone Wars. What more do we need?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago

The idea that we can create a "slur" for an inanimate object is the result of corporate propaganda.

Marketing teams would attempt to use propaganda to humanize this auto correct software before admitting it can't do what they said it could.

[–] BillDaCatt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Not clanker but simply: Clank!

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ratchet: "I'll just call you... ***** for short."

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

There it is.

My favorite game series of all time.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Absolutely not. Clank is a lovable character.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Proving once again that humans desire an out-group to ridicule. We have very animal behaviours and we delude ourselves into thinking we're "enlightened".

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago

Hey guys, I found the Clanker!

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

For decades we thought the arrival of an extraterrestrial species could unite humanity but it was the smart fridges all along! What a time to be alive.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel this way about my socks. Those fuckers are worthless. I'm better than them.

How can someone feel enlightened by hating on inanimate objects? I don't get it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

finally the robots' true purpose revealed. we created them so we could say more slurs lmao

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

In the Manual it says you can whip your clankers as hard as you want. If they don't malfunction within 3 hours then it's all covered under warranty!

[–] eksb@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

human-spawn

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] r_deckard@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

I miss the 70s flair. Can we have Slop-O-Matic 3000 at least?

[–] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago

Chiphead is a good one if klanker isn't enough

[–] sixty@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are we so terrible as human beings we need to still find slurs for stuff in 2025?

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

We can always refine our craft. As new groups emerge we need to adapt and find new ways to discriminate.

[–] Object@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago

Doubt any one of them is going to stick.

load more comments
view more: next ›