this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
22 points (61.2% liked)

Fediverse

35921 readers
304 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tldr lower. So there’s (yet again) another flurry of communities that are all crossposting each other’s content with this hentai stuff.

Aside from a lot of this being made with AI, it is in essence soft porn and I don’t want it in /all.

I usually write a comment under such posts saying

Set your comm to NSFW pls

Rarely the mod write “Done” and that’s it. Often it is downvoted, and now it’s also just removed by mod for (I wouldn’t know the reason as it’s on a different instance to mine)

https://lemmy.world/post/33972247

TLDR; I don’t want my all feed to be a soft porn feed, is there anyway of not having these hentai soft porn communities in all, apart from individually blocking them (which doesn’t really work, as they keep making more communities).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know any place which have the proposed "soft nsfw" filter separate from "nsfw".

Comparison with reddit is weird as reddit r/all is full of ""artistic"" pictures or paintings of naked women.

Also the fediverse is not really like reddit. The more the platform grows the more useless All becomes. Try to go to mastodon and browse by "all" it's unusable. Either pick an instance with a good "local" you like or all is not really that important. I don't think it's a "first impressions", first impression is "local". All is never going to be a curated feed, not a consistent one. It's a federated platform, which means a LOT of diversity and variety on communities and posts.

Also I don't see or even want to start consider anything that shows a little skin "nsfw". I think that's a very personal taste that should not be universally applied.

I really don't buy the argument here.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Argument 1: nobody else has it so why should we? Because we are new, the next step - we improve what needs to be done better.

Argument 2: reddit is full of porn.. see above. We can make it better, at very little cost to anyone.

Argument 3 is undermining your first 2, but I agree. This would cause a few instances to become very popular and render the concept of federation unnecessary.

I don’t understand how a bunch of people here are basically say /all is a sewer, accept it.

I’m say it is not and doesn’t have to be. It is a place for discovery, and there is a way to make that more pleasant. Another commenter said an AI filter would also be good.

All I am suggesting is In addition to having the Fediverse allowing posts and communities to be marked NSFW, to allow for more filters. One filter like what I am suggesting could be a snowflake or FamFriendly filter which removes suggestive, soft porn or racy or soft gore stuff. Another could be AI which removes synthetically generated content.

How anyone can be against that is beyond me. I’m not asking for these things to be turned on by default, or to shove it down people’s throats. By default /all would still be the same

I understand NSFW and FamilyFriendly are blurry concepts. It is still up to the post OPs, community creators, moderators and instance administrators to use these properly.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

People are against it because several reasons.

First because it's a very specific taste/opinion that they don't share. You are saying that "all would be more appealing without softcore porn", but it seems that you are the only one who thinks that here, most people don't care or even like it. We could also put a filter to blurry dog pictures for people scare of dogs, where does it end? Until which point personal tastes should have their own explicit filters? It ends in a "word filter" which is already usable.

Also I would say that most people is against this because it reads as a first step towards a "porn ban". We have no puritan advertisements or pay processor to please. People here like the freedom. And that would be a step in the opposite direction. It reads a little like so many discourses we are seeing in so many places to make them "family friendly" and to "protect the children". I would suppose that due the nature of the fediverse (which is a push back against those people controlling our internet) is against anything that looks like that.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Ok, I hear you. But as I said, it’s just adding filter options to those snowflakes like me, while not changing a single pixel for those like yourself.

Allowing superior UX for more people is how you make the internet better.

Nobody is advocating for a ban, nor can or will this be used as a first step towards one.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

[...] and I don’t want it in /all.

Skill issue. That's literally what /all is for.

Block what you don't want, or set your starting page to subscribed and curate from there. That's half the point of this entire place.

The other half you already did the work: notified the comms they have to set to NFW, etc.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I’ve responded to the top comment to address the flaws in that argument.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 14 hours ago

I am amazed at how helpless some people....

You don't want to see it, click block!

JFC have some fucking agency... I know kt is annoyo g bit the fix is easy and right there.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The only way All works is by either manually blocking individual communities or manually blocking certain instances.

Once you're done, it's mostly fine, but like you say, new ones do pop up.

There's ONE GUY who runs like 20 different AI porn communities and keeps creating more.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Why am I not surprised that the most sensible response comes from one of the more awesome mods on this platform

o7 sir, thanks for acknowledging my point and chiming in.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Hey, I was in your boat when I started on Lemmy 2 years ago.

"Wow, that's a lot of furry porn. And gay porn. And gay, furry porn."

Not gonna judge, if that's your thing, it's your thing, it's just not MY thing...

[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Exactly what I've done. Set my settings to hide NSFW, blocked most of the "soft" communities like hot girls and moe anime girls and whatever else (blocking the lemmynsfw.com instance is a great place to start), and I use All frequently. That's how I've found all the communities I've subscribed to, but frankly, my /all feed is small enough that I usually see all my subscribed communities anyway.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Plenty of other people have said it, and I'll repeat it: Stop browsing by /all. Find a handful of communities you want to subscribe to, and stick with those.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I’ve responded to the top comment to address the flaws in that argument.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 25 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Stop browsing by /all. The firehose will always have content that is of dubious categorization. Instead of trying to change the whole world to conform to your tastes, curate your communities and leave others be.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

I don't disagree, and it'd be really nice if people were better about tagging things like scantily clad yuri as NSFW. Even if there's no naughty bits, I'd just really appreciate being able to browse for new linux communities in public while having questionable stuff come up as blurred thumbnails. I don't want it gone, I just want tagging guidelines to be followed.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

Filter ani.social

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"All" means all. I suggest not using "all" but subscribing to things you actually want to see.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is a recurring response, so forgive me for hijacking your comment to write this again.

/all is where we make our first impression to the world. For a lot of people /all is where (on a still growing platform) people go to discover. I don’t think having an additional “soft NSFW” filter would be a bad thing.

There’s a reason most clients have an NSFW filter in their settings.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Go to your Settings, uncheck the "Show NSFW content" box, click Save.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

?

How does this… Did you…

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"All means all.

Not always. For instance if you have NSFW filtered, in which case "all" means "most".

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

All is still all, but you curated it to your liking (like OP should do)

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody really seems to be pointing out that you are on an instance that does not require the behavior you are requesting.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I thought this community is for discussions about the Fediverse and not limited to any particular instance.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I browse All and have like 2000 communities blocked

[Edit] 1823 communities and 12 instances blocked

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I presume you don’t have alts then!

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Technically I DO have an account on a different instance I was considering switching to but I logged out immediately after seeing they federated with hexbear lol

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The subscription tab exists for this very reason. Stop being a selfish prick and trying to curate /ALL

[–] hono4kami@piefed.social 45 points 1 day ago (33 children)

No! Those who posts unmarked NSFW are the ones that should stop being a selfish prick and mark it as NSFW

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (12 children)

You're somewhat correct of course but the NSFW tag exists for a reason. If there is one entire category of /all you can just filter out due to lack of interest, it should be stuff like that. Maybe at some point we'll also get an 'AI' tag.

The pro of being able to 'safely', for lack of a better term, browse /all is being able to discover stuff that you are not subscribed to, stuff you might not find otherwise.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] wjs018@piefed.social 25 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I mean...that doesn't really seem that bad? Also, asking for the whole community to be nsfw is a wild overreaction looking at the other pictures in the community.

If you browse the all feed, expect to see some things you don't like/enjoy. It's a fire hose of content by design. Learn to curate your subscribed feed and stick to it. Frankly, lemmy doesn't have great filters/blocks to do what you want, and expecting the whole rest of the internet to abide by such strict standards of nsfw isn't going to happen.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] hisao@ani.social 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I personally don't consider this NSFW.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›