MentalEdge

Snuggle

TM

What do you mean?

She's got the eyes and hair color. What other physical traits would need to be corrected?

Modeus.

She seems to be snapping a pic of Judgement's crotch...

Unfortunately the peace plan includes the US blocking Ukraine joining from their end, too.

Saame

Oh no, indeed. You don't need to actually care about that, but at least pretend like you're a considerate person. Don't yuck our yum, and be nice.

Consider this a warning, citing rule 6.

Refer to my other comment.

It does rely on people putting relevant hashtags on their posts, but do you want to hear from someone who doesn't do that?

Why wouldn't I?

Hashtags are not even close to a reliable way to follow a subject. The fact that people can post without them, means a lot of people don't. Not because they don't have something interesting to say, but because they are posting it for their followers. The entire culture around how discussion should be conducted is different among users used to the twitter format.

To post on lemmy, your post must be associated with a relevant community. Hence, posts go out to subscribers interested in the subject, rather than to the followers of the user. As such, posts live or die on the merit of their content. Not who posted it.

I don't like the twitter format.

I'm interested in following subjects, not individual people.

In my very first reply to you:

If there isn't an overabundance of food (as you yourself admit, housing is insufficient).

This whole time I've been trying to tell you, "no, that is actually a problem" because you started off by minimizing the contribution of corporate interests to the housing problem. I guess I should have made the the implied "as well" more obvious, but it was always there.

You didn't start off with "we need more housing". You started off with "it's not the companies and they are good actually".

So no, I wasn't gonna reply with "yes, and". I didn't have the option because what you started with needed actual refuting, first.

Did I at some point say we don't need more housing?

Protip: switch to "yes, and".

You won't get a positive response by continuing with "no, actually".

I believe these same corporate forces are a major reason why housing isn't being built. Hence my focus is on them, not simply "build more homes".

In my city, homes are being built, but only by the rich for the rich. I'm finnish, btw.