this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
219 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

72158 readers
3097 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it sounds good, until you realize that it needs not only AR glasses, but one with built in cameras.

such glasses need to be banned yesterday. AR glasses are obviously not the problem, but basically walking always on cameras are

[–] lime@feddit.nu 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

all AR glasses need cameras. that's how they figure out where in the R to put the A.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

not really. AR glasses don't have to be aware of your surroundings, they can just place content relative to where you look, and they can use a gyroscope as a compass for more advanced things. maybe there are other sensors that would be useful too while being compatible with privacy.

of course they won't be able to place apps on your fridge, or run search on anyone coming by on the street, but it can still be very useful

[–] radding@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ban them? No.

While there are misuses and privacy invasions, they still can be beneficial for some people. Bracket bans only harm those who can truely benefit from it (visual impaired, deaf, folks who need translations etc )

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Special permits are a non issue. Disguised in any way cameras should be banned outright tbh

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

yes. ban them. they are already illegal in civilized countries for recording people without their expressed consent.

ok, maybe I wasn't clear, ban them from public spaces, including venues. you can use it at home if you want, and at your friends if they don't send you home for it.

folks who need translations

they can point their phones' focused camera on the text they want to translate.

for disabilities, we need to research tools that allow affected people to exist more freely while being compatible with privacy.

yes, I'm also against artificial eyes that work electronically or can connect to an electronic system

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I'm starting to think that without the advertisement industry that the whole world's capitalistic societies would collapse. Where else is value so subjective that you can earn a million bucks if you are slightly famous and in a 30 second commercial.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just be like the French and ban billboard advertising. No need for these stupid gadgets.

French cities are banning billboards - https://www.marketplace.org/story/2023/03/06/french-cities-are-banning-billboards

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Vermont bans billboards already

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 78 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Super clever project, but goddamn does this need feel so dystopian.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Work 8 hours
Sleep 8 hours
Play 8 hours

Old-school dystopias were a fucking dream compared to the modern world I guess.

Al Bundy peaked in highschool, never went to college, was a shoe salesman at the mall. Al Bundy had an, at least, three bedroom single family home in a nice neighborhood, supported a family of four plus a dog on his single income, had ample free time to spend with family and friends and to spend on hobbies.

Al Bundy: Failure and constant butt of jokes in the 1980s, unobtainable vision of success in the 2020s

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So, through my lifetime that "Work 8 hours" somehow evolved into:

Leave for work at 7am. Show up for work by 8am. Get an hour for lunch, unpaid. Leave work at 5pm. Get home approximately 6pm, if you don't stop to buy groceries or something.

I suppose commuting and lunch are supposed to be part of those "8 hours of play"?

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago

Eight hours of labour, eight hours of recovery, eight hours of preparing for labour/recovery.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm all for the "SLEEP 8 HOURS" bit though. I need more of that in my life.

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If anything this is an overly optimistic representation of consumerism given that they limit work to 8 hours and encourage 8 hours of play

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

No hours left for housework, eating, or shitting.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If there’s a real world screen showing a real world ad to you, you’ve got to be really careful not to lean against the screen with a broken spark plug or some other sort of ceramic shard, because you could easily shatter the screen and make it really hard for you and other people to be advertised to 👉👈🥺

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

~~Google~~ DuckDuckGo "Tactical Pen" 😏

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Save money and get a spring loaded center punch at a hardware store.

Or one of these. It blends in better with the rest of your pens in a bag.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is that first one used for? It's grouped with leatherworking tools when I look at it.

[–] Doublenut@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Center punch for drilling holes. It makes a little indent in whatever (leather, metal, wood) so your drill bit doesn't walk from your center mark, or sometimes in the case of leather, give you a starting point for your awl.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Oh that's actually convenient... For $3 I will have to pick one up.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'll turn to spray paint and vandalism if we ever reach that kind of ad hellscape.

[–] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 days ago

If you can superimpose a blocker over real-world ads, you can superimpose ads onto plain walls too

[–] mat@linux.community 10 points 3 days ago

Enjoyed the article but augh that sticky banner at the top that follows as I scroll took up 30% of my reading space. Gave up halfway through to enable reader mode on Firefox mobile...

[–] molten@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Any AR or XR glasses that don't sell your data to everyone who gives a shady glance? or can be modified not to?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago

Seems to me pointless, biggest one being, if this was developed in a working manner, and was used... advertisers would mix between going more subtle, or more obnoxious. Just like on the web.

IE subway stations could put say a code you need to get into the subway in the middle of an advertisement. IE the real life equivelant of "you must disable your adblocker to continue".

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Instructions to block ads in real life:

Step 1: Pull out your eyes.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Step 2: Blow out your ear drums.