!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
+/- 5 years (I am in my 30s).
And honestly (I will probably be killed for this) I have no problems with others having big age differences as long as the younger person is at least 21. It's not like you are significantly more susceptible than later in your life and don't know what you're doing.
I've always dated around +- 3-4 years. I usually didn't get along with men who were a lot older or younger. My husband is one year and four month younger.
Your current girlfriend is 57?
3 girlfriends, each one is 19.
Or something went wrong and they somehow seduced an entire nursery.
Yes, that is why stating the units of measurement is so important. 3 pcs of 19 y.o girls is good, while 19 pcs of 3 y.o. is a disaster.
18-5000.
If you're 5001, I'm sorry but you're too old.
I'm 9 years older than my kid sister. We had an agreement, she doesn't date anyone older than me and I don't date anyone younger than her.
We both married people in that range.
Internet Creepieness Rule:
Your age / 2 + 7 is the low end limit.
This.
I strayed from this formula by 1 year once (I was 38, she was 25), and there was this strange generational gap where we just had completely different interests, we didn't get each others' references, and things fizzled pretty quickly.
Anyone else I've dated has been within this formula and we've gotten a long quite well. If they're below this number for you, or you're below this number for them, even by a little bit, it'll get weird and you'll run out of things to talk about pretty quickly.
I’m 38 and can’t imagine dating a 26 year old. The woman I’m currently seeing is my same age and it’s great.
Whatever-whatever. I don't have any strict age limit, if you care to make your case I'll listen. I'm not that busy.
That being said I do have the most in common with women in their 30s, being in my 30s myself
[Error] to [Error]
(Don't want a relationship. I've seen first hand how my parents are miserable with each other, not looking forward to that shit)
First step: Get permission from my wife to date.
@HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world body has been discovered behind a Wendy's near a dumpster with a card board sign
single like a dollar bill, have it for free!
I don't really even have an age range I guess, I've never met anyone I was interested in dating.
None, but I'm asexual/aromantic, so..
That is a strange way to say she's 57...
But anyway! Range varies wildly with age. 6 years is something you at least ponder at age 25, but will feel like "same age" around 50.
My feeling based on what people seem to at least not care to even gossip lightly about: max 1 year at age 15. 5 years at 40. 10 years at age 60+.
Wider ranges are not problematic, but gets into at least "interesting to talk about". E.g. "They are 33 and 40! Huh! Good for them."
It depends entirely on the person. Some people are intelligent, self possessed adults by the time they're 20, other people are immature shitbags well into their old age. Age is a poor metric for evaluating compatibility.
+/- 6 years.
In theory maybe 10 years in either direction (I'm old) but in practice I've only had long term relationships with guys within a couple years of my age.
Lovers between times, for whatever reason I always ended up with younger guys, that seemed to be the people into me, but still never more than 10 years difference.
When I was your age? One or two years at most. Absolutely not anyone much older or younger, no.
Hypothetically, I don't have a limit st the high end, and the low end would be based more on the individual, but no younger than eighteen.
In reality, chances of finding someone in their twenties that would mesh well with for dating is unlikely, so thirty-ish is a more realistic lower age.
Upper end is less restricted for dating, but on a realistic level, I'm not going to enter a relationship with someone that's into their seventies just because of life span probability after that.
Luckily, I'm happily married, so I don't have to worry about that shit. But I've never cared about ages for dating, since dating is essentially "trying on" someone for a more committed relationship. It makes it worth interacting with people that are less likely to be compatible on a surface level, when going into it with the knowledge that it's probably going to peter out anyway, so the risks of it having a high price are lower.
Seriously, every relationship has difficulties. You can't predict what's going to arise over decades of being together. So limiting options by age ends up being arbitrary. While I never went looking for people far away from my age, anyone old enough and developed enough to understand what a relationship is was the determinant.
Now, on a practical level, once you're out in the work force, chances are that you'll be interacting with people from their mid-to-late twenties up to their sixties. So you aren't going to end up dating outside of that range often. To date someone you have to meet them, and communicate often enough to ask them for time outside of whatever scope you meet them in. So I never really dated outside that range at any point. But I wouldn't have rejected the possibility if it came up.
I dunno, I just don't see age gaps as a problem.
If I were to date at the age of 42, I would not date anyone below the age of 39 or above the age of 46. I would prefer only a 4-year gap in either direction, as the number 4 feels right (very vibes and personal preference based reasoning).
The largest age gap I’ve been involved with was about 4 years. I was 31, she was 35, and we lasted about three months. Current partner and I are about 1.5 years apart.
If I were single and interested in dating, I think the lowest age I’d be willing to go is half my age plus 7. Someone at the absolute lowest end of that range would need to check a lot of other boxes for me to be willing. Most I’d be willing to go over my age is about 10 years.
But frankly, if I were single, I’d probably just stop the online dating thing and live my best life on my own, and if I met someone who was interested cool, and if not it ain’t the end of the world.
n/a to n/a
19, probably 17 for a while to 18 as the youngest. my fiancée is 18. oldest, 25?? 30??
edit: maybe 40 if a woman, 30 if a man just because i don’t really like middle-aged men (middle aged men, no offense 😓)
None taken. I don't like us either.