this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
846 points (99.4% liked)

News

30293 readers
3974 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This was some common during protests in Spain they made a movie about it: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4555674/

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"A young man who lost his eye with a rubber ball in a street protest, coincidentally meets the riot police who shot the ball in a dinner."

Holy shit. This must be a thing that cops do on purpose, then.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I don't think so, rubber bullets travel relatively slow, I don't think they would be accurate enough to aim for the eyes. I do think they're probably not careful enough about the face of though

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Eyewitness News Reporter Sid Garcia spoke to the protester who was shot from his hospital bed at the L.A. General Medical Center.

I was thinking at first like, how lucky to be in a hospital bed already when being shot. 🧐

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 143 points 2 days ago (8 children)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It is this kind of thing that made me decide to ignore my city's municipal codes regarding protest gear. It outlaws the wearing of bulletproof vests, helmets, protective visors, hearing protection, gas masks, and so on. To say the least, I cannot respect a law that is designed to permit bullies to injure or kill people who did nothing wrong.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

how is it legal to stop people from wearing bulletproof vests in public!? Why aren't 2nd amendment mfs screaming about this?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

"See, the second amendment specifically says you have a right to bear arms, and that means any kind of gun I want to buy should be legal."

"However, there is no amendment saying you have a right to wear armor. So being protected isn't a constitutional right".

"Oh? This supressor I want to put on my gun? That should be allowed by the second amendment. Wait, what do you mean there is no constitutional right to gun accessories?!"

It usually goes something like that. I'd like to point out here that there isn't a constitutional right to wear pants or eat bacon either.

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 10 points 1 day ago

If you don’t bring any protective gear, you better run when things get ugly. If you plan to stay when things get ugly, you better bring the appropriate gear with you.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 15 points 1 day ago

Gods forbid that people should protect their faces from damage.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 63 points 2 days ago (10 children)

In the video from last weekend of the Australian reporter being shot in the back, you can clearly see the police officer behind her raise and aim straight at her. Clearly there's no repercussions for misusing these weapons.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Different victim but here's what a shot to the back can do:

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 14 hours ago

This shit is ridiculous. I have many, many words. None of which are not pure rage and sadness.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 14 hours ago

I had a similar bruise from a less-lethal bullet on my butt, and I've seen a kid get hit with one in his head, that was scary. This was a long time ago though, but the bullets then were steel core and rubber around it. Not sure if they use different ones in the US.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Hundreds have been permanently blinded.

Just think about how that could even happen. You put any of us in their shoes, we would obviously aim low, to prevent permanent damage.

It's like police are overgrown toddlers, mad that they're forced to use less lethal rounds... So they take it out on civilians and aim for the face. Can you imagine being as hate-filled as these fucking orcs that you would want to blind the people you "serve" for the rest of their lives (if you don't kill them)!? Absolute monsters...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] selfdefense420@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

"Just one more peaceful protest bro. I swear bro"

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I hope they recover their vision. As someone who lost sight in one eye I can attest that going from binocular to monocular vision is life altering AND not considered a disability under the ~~law~~ Social Security requirements but typically is covered by ADA.

Edit: clarification.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (9 children)

How is losing 50% of your eyesight not a disability?

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Because you still have eyesight in the other eye, so in social security's mind there's jobs in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (the DOT) you could still perform, and if there's three jobs you could perform despite your impairment you aren't disabled. Also, if you're under 50 you almost certainly aren't disabled for some reason. It's maddening.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Can't judge distance anymore either.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

That's bonkers, in the UK I'm technically disabled because i have tinnitus and ADHD. (I still work like anyone else, but I have protected rights because of my status)

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A lot of states don't even care if you've only got so-so vision in one eye and are completely blind in the other. No stereopsis, no problem! Here's a driver's license. Good luck.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 15 hours ago

I would absolutely not be comfortable driving with vision in only one eye. It isn't just depth perception, but you are losing significant field of vision.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Here's a driver's license. ~~Good luck.~~ Now get to work you lazy bum!

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My dude, teeth are considered luxury bones in this country.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

In general, insurance covers nothing in your head.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Waiting for Pussolini to send the National Guard to city hall, to depose the mayor and council.

[–] 96ToyotaCamry@lemmy.world 132 points 2 days ago (6 children)

You shouldn’t have to wear safety rated glasses to protest, but I wouldn’t go to one without them at this point. If you normally wear glasses and they’re not rated an impact can shatter them and cause even more damage than not wearing them at all would have.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 2 days ago (19 children)

If you have glasses buy safety glasses that go over top of them. Doesn’t matter if your glasses are rated for it, use the safety glasses. Glasses are expensive and safety glasses can be bought for fairly cheap.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The protester was among tens of thousands of people who took to the streets for the demonstrations across Southern California and the rest of the country.

Tens of thousands? There were over FIVE MILLION protesters.

E OVER THIRTEEN MILLION protesters - thank you, Lucidlethargy

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 62 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kayky@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need a database of pigs and ICE.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

best they can do is have palintir make a database about citizens.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine if you are a refugee and escaped from a war/tyrannical regime only to end up in the US and reading these type of things on the news...

Must be awkward... 👀

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

Pretty depressing to imagine escaping one despotic regime, through hell and high water, only to watch another rise and set its sights right on you.

load more comments
view more: next ›