this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
274 points (95.7% liked)

News

36966 readers
1690 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teh_shame@infosec.pub 180 points 2 years ago (6 children)

This is how companies lay people off without having to report layoffs

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 71 points 2 years ago (4 children)

And if they resign, no severance.

Pretty sure Tesla is getting sued right now because they tried to call layoffs resignations with this same scheme

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can an employee just refuse to go back and continue to work? I'd much rather be fired by them than give them a pass by resigning.

[–] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, but they don't have to pay you unemployment, because they can say you're not following employment requirements.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

they can't change your job in order to get you to quit, though. You don't have to agree to new requirements, and can get unemployment because they fire you for not doing so.

In this case, this might still qualify as constructive dismissal. Even if it for sure would, not everyone will apply for unemployment, and they can still challenge it, causing delays and getting more people to not pursue it, ultimately resulting in a layoff that's cheaper than it's ought to be.

[–] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Yeah - I'm not a lawyer, but my casual understanding is you can get out of that gotcha if you apply the rule equally to everyone at the company. No legal action against these RTO mandates has been successful so far.

That being said, I didn't fully read the article. Roblox is offering severance to those who don't want to RTO - that's less shitty than a lot of the other tech companies.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That seems like it would only apply to people hired after March 2020. Anyone before then would have been in office anyway.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Maybe. If both parties agreed to the change to become remote full time, then they'd both have to agree to change back. Though having a previous non-remote work agreement changed by an international state of emergency does give some weight to the employer side.

But I'm not a lawyer.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 years ago

If people were hired (say, in 2020) under the condition that they’re allowed to work from home, this might be considered constructive dismissal - that is, forcing an employee to quit in a way that is equivalent to firing them. The employees are then entitled to the normal rules for unemployment, and potentially severance pay, unused vacation cashout, and so on.

I think Musk is facing several lawsuits along those lines, but might be moving to settle because the cost of arbitration would potentially bankrupt the company.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Employees should sue since this is functionally a layoff.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

That's what unemployment is for. If they fight the claim, then yeah, lawyer.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

They are actually not able to follow up. They are saying resign.. not get canned. They actually cannot afford severance. Best way to fight back is not comply, not resign.

[–] Vodik_VDK@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Constructive or insightful comments, such as this, are the kind of content Lemmy should strive for.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 76 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When will these asshole narcissist CEOs learn? We dont want to go into the office to stroke your fuckin ego, douchebag.

[–] Zorg@lemmings.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I blame all the managers who struggle to create remotely engaging virtual meetings, and who count the majority of their team's productivity based on how many hours they can see them sitting at their desk🙄

[–] whatupwiththat@kbin.social 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

another out of touch shitbag CEO ~ sky blue yet

[–] Zealousideal_Fox900@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Guess what? He also sued someone for exposing him for protecting paedophiles!

[–] force@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He's one of the highest paid CEOs in the entire world, fun fact... the 7th highest paid, at USD$232,786,391 in 2021(which is 1600x the average roblox employee's pay)

[–] NBJack@reddthat.com 32 points 2 years ago

Unspoken here is the third option: navigate a series of untextured raised rectangular platforms littered with smaller rectangles that will fire you automatically if you touch them, designed by an 8 year old that got bored halfway through the engineering phase and wandered off to play Breakin Story 2.

The good news is that, for only 399 robux a month, you can get VIP membership, which includes a coil that allows you to immediately jump over the entire platform and land into a dated pile of two dimensional meme sprites they meant to clean up.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] zoly@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

They will, with only a month of severance. Their goal is to cut cost, these are layoffs

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Cool so what prevents me from not going in 3 times a week and also not resigning?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I was given an ultimatum like this once, to do X or resign, and I chose not to do X and refused to resign, and I worked there for an additional nine months until I found something better. I did have to endure several meetings where they kept saying I "needed" to resign or comply, but they never fired me. Said I would get a bad reference, but since that's extremely risky on the company's part, I still used them as a reference. HR dgaf. They just know they can't say anything negative about a previous employee. The whole thing is absurd posturing.

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 12 points 2 years ago

Exactly. Fire me. I'll work as an independent contractor and suck up your unemployment until I can't get another dime, then I'll get a job.

[–] souplook@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

why is it risky on their part?

[–] Philippe23@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

It's a huge opening to get sued. So you could lose millions, but it'll never make you a cent. So most are advised to just confirm very basic information like how long the employee worked there.

https://www.achrnews.com/articles/141319-what-can-i-say-about-former-employees

load more comments (2 replies)

They should have made you an executive

[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Many companies are doing this. They're OK with the attrition. Acceptable losses as far as they're concerned. I suppose it's their right. I hope those that quit over it find better jobs.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Great way to lose talent, not sure you understand the impact that has when you lose higher ranking resources (that aren’t meaningless mid managers)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antidote101@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Roblox rhymes with sux cocks.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Rascabin@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Well, i thought it was funny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 years ago

The smirk of a smug asshole.

[–] MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[–] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But how are their parents going to get them to work? /s

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Hey Roblox! Learn what the Dead Sea Effect means for you!

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Punchable face

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›