this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
246 points (98.8% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

5026 readers
1117 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ST: Generations, DISCO s5e10 "Life Itself," and SNW s1e1 "Strange New Worlds"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

technically Kirk didn't have a cabin - that kitchen was some kind of construct within the Nexus wave he got swept up in. If he'd had a cabin he and the boys probably would have gone there in The Final Frontier instead of camping outdoors. But it's a good question about the economics of the post-scarcity Federation, where everybody seems to take housing for granted. Who gets apartments and who gets chateaus?

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Kirk had specific memories he was reliving, so at some point before or after FF he had the cabin. Also continuity is something of a myth in Trek.

Likely, one has the option to live to their level of comfort. Though, larger city living would generally be on the smaller side. There's probably also restrictions on how large/opulent a home can be based on number of occupants.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I mean post scarcity means post scarcity. So anyone who wants a chateau gets one. Most people I don’t think would actually want one though. It means being more isolated, maybe one a newly habitable planet.

Personally I wouldn’t want or need one. Give me a truly for real actually sound isolated large apartment in a great location and I would be happy.

[–] ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Maybe because as a captain they spend so much time in a starship that they have need to live in a large open land with a wood/stone cabin.

Like with developers, we end up looking for hobbies that doesn’t involve technology.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Same goes for the rest of the crew though.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

My head canon is that instead of monetary rewards for doing important or dangerous work, you get more land to use. That would mean trashmen, farmers, nurses, and starship crew would have huge palaces and ceos would live in a shoebox. Picard gets double sized because he's a captain and a farmer. Same with Boimler.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Poor Boimy has it rough.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I rather thought that there were no “palaces” and no “shoeboxes“, but still a varied range of accommodations that are a mix between inheritance and state ownership where they lend it to an individual or our family.

There’s a very good reason why most sci-fi series that espouse a futuristic socialistic utopian future never really get into the details. Because we, today, haven’t figured that shit out yet.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I always thought that land wasn't really an issue since there are thousands of star fleet planets. Also I assumed earth would have more attractive land available since there wouldn't be a need for a lot of transportation infrastructure in the future(transporters, stuff flies,etc)

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There are "only" around 150 Federation planets in the TNG era, probably most with extremely high quality of life like Earth, but you might not feel as welcome there. I mean imagine living on Vulcan, sheesh.

There are thousands of colonies and room for lots more, but colony life is dangerous and relatively rough.

I mean there's only so much ocean view property in San Francisco available. But I think you're right about transporters and replicators - with the ability to go anywhere nothing needs to be novel, and everyone is basically free to homestead wherever they want without actually having to work.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It seems like colony life is really only dangerous and rough when they're first getting established. In enterprise and strange new worlds most of the colonies further from our solar system probably aren't ideal, but by TNG there must be hundreds of well-established colonies with high quality of life that we just never see because nothing interesting happens there. I mean at the very least we see the one in the ghost fucking episode where everyone just decided they wanted to live like 1800s scotland, but they were safe and happy there for a long time and there's no reason they couldn't have had a more futuristic way of life. Their weather was fully controlled to simulate the highlands.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago

Jeez I get wanting authenticity, but if I had full control, I'm not sure the weather would be part of what I'd keep authentic from the Highlands haha.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I mean imagine living on Vulcan, sheesh.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe they figured out how to make timeshares non-predatory?

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I imagine that outside of industry and population centers, most other areas would become a natural preserve. That is, unless an Admiral owes you a favor.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you had teleportation available for transport, wouldn't you move into the middle of nowhere?

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

After vetting local flora and fauna.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you seen/read MurderBot ?

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Something to look into, I suppose.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dinner! (For a ~~month~~ year!)

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Just buffer the leftovers.

[–] milkisklim@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We even know Sisko was planning on building a cabin in the woods on Bajor over looking some river. He bought land sometime in the later seasons.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

in a post scarcity society with industrial scale matter replication and matter/antimatter power sources—why the hell not? I’m sure anyone could have one if they asked.

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My guess is that in post scarcity societies, a cabin in a remote location far from everyone is the easiest thing to get. There's plenty of empty land all over the world.

City centre on the other hand, apartments might be small with a waiting list.

[–] match@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago

The entirety of the Maquis rebellion, explained in light pollution maps

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

About the only way the apartments the cast from Friends live in could make sense.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This begs the question: who gets the beachfront property on Star Trek Earth?

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The answer, whomever wants it. Since most everyone has easy access to anywhere they want to go and anything they want to do, things we consider luxuries are trivial pass times.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago

And what if there's more demand than supply?

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man this episode makes me cringe. Although the follow-up is arguably worse, with Geordi getting all indignant that someone would be upset at him dating a holographic deepfake of them. Is it so hard to write someone being socially awkward without making them a total creep?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aww but he wasn't a creep, he was just genuinely really bad at understanding women and communication in a relationship. Shit, Data got more action.

Laforge : I just don't get it, Guinan. I can field-strip a fusion reactor; I can realign a power transfer tunnel. Why can't I make anything work with a woman like Christy? It's like... I don't know what to do. I don't know what to say.

Guinan : You're doing fine with me.

Laforge : You're different.

Guinan : No, you're different.

Laforge : But I'm not trying now.

Guinan : That's my point.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See, that's fine. If he had taken Guinan's advice to heart and been himself with an actual woman, great! Hell, even if he'd gone with a holodeck character that was fictional or dead, fine! Date Marie Curie for all I care. But dating an "idealized" virtual copy of a fellow Starfleet officer is super creepy.

Now, don't get me wrong, I don't think Geordi's a creep. I just think the writers made him a creep for those two episodes, which is what bothers me.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think he was more himself on that holodeck than he's ever been with a real woman, but I'm not sure that helps my case that he's not a creep 😆

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 4 points 22 hours ago

Nah that's fine. It's good he found an outlet, dating on the holodeck itself isn't a problem. Even if he'd had one of Quark's holosmut programs, it might raise some eyebrows on a starship, but it would ultimately be harmless fun. It was his choice of companion that was creepy, same as Barkley when he had a Troi program.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

When you control large portions of the galaxy handing out land is like handing out stock before an IPO

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn’t everyone want a cabin in the woods?

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure, but not the one run by these guys:

[–] teft@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I found their revised black board:

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

John Shepard?

EDIT: Oh, I misunderstood what was going on in this board.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Of course. Who else would bet on the wraiths vs some dumb college kids?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s my belief that Starfleet still pays their officers, but that since they spend so much time on missions, they have fewer opportunities to spend the money. And by the time they become captains, they’ve probably saved up quite the nest egg.

How do you think Sisko afforded that land on Bajor? Though, being Emissary might have afforded him free or deeply discounted land.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

DS9 is probably the closest we got to really investigating federation economics. At some point Sisko warns Quark that if he stops being on the Federation's good side, hell make him start paying for rent and utilities again. So they have some concept of converting "time and effort" into "credit". The star fleet officers all have latinum to spend at Quarks, and Quark complains on several occasions that business gets slow when Starfleet stops visiting his bar, so he's definitely getting paid.

My assumption is that officers are given an allowance or extended credit for interactions with other cultures, and that allowance/credit is either a higher number or simply "more lax" the higher rank you are. Want to "expense" a holosuite visit at Quarks with Starfleet, you'll have to explain yourself less the higher rank you are. Kind of like "unlimited PTO" at big tech companies.

Like, an ensign might request a cabin in the woods from the cabin logistics department, but they'll be in line behind all the captains, whereas an admiral would be able to jump the line.

This question came up a lot in DaystromInstitute.

The general headcanon is that rent, access to the stations grid and crew for maintenance is credited at fair market value for officers to use at Quarks. Plus having a steady stream of Starfleet or Bajoran officers there would deter general crime and ruckus, much like why gas stations tend to offer free coffee for cops.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bargain, for sure. I wonder what Kasidy's doing with that plot these days. Let's check in...

load more comments
view more: next ›