465
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Democrats are standing firm in their refusal to bail out the House Republican majority as it struggles to elect a new speaker 10 days after after booting Rep. Kevin McCarthy.

They're also dialing up the rhetoric against the GOP’s new nominee for speaker, prominent Donald Trump ally Jim Jordan of Ohio, blasting him as an insurrectionist, election denier and extremist.

“House Republicans have selected as their nominee to be the speaker of the people’s House the chairman of the chaos caucus, a defender in a dangerous way of dysfunction, and an extremist extraordinaire,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Friday on the steps of the Capitol, flanked by dozen of Democratic lawmakers. “His focus has been on peddling lies and conspiracy theories and driving division amongst the American people.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 165 points 1 year ago

He is an insurrectionist. See his political positions on wikipedia here. It's a well-sourced article. He also opposes

  • The ACA
  • Research on disinformation
  • The Environment, in general
  • Abortion, to the point where he said that the 10-year-old girl who got raped and needed to travel to Indiana to get an abortion was lying about it until the police arrested the guy and he confessed.
  • Regulating big tech
  • Taxes, Spending, pretty broadly
  • Same-sex marriage

He's an extremist. They do not have the political power to elect an extremist from their ranks. They need a moderate.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

Don’t forget his sexual assault coverup

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Instead of "trashing Gym Jordan as an 'insurrectionist'" it should read "reminding them that Gym Jordan is an insurrectionist".

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No, "trash" is used appropriately.

trash (v): to subject to criticism or invective especially : to disparage strongly

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yes but in the political landscape it implies the usual hyperbole and rhetoric. That he is an insurrectionist is a simple fact and should be treated as such.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

Yeah why should they help cleanup the other sides fucking mess, not like they’d get credit and cooperation if they did.

[-] hibsen@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Honestly it’s astounding that they’ve apparently managed to realize this for once. I’ll have to send a letter of thanks or something.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Seriously... Treating bad faith children as if they're functioning adults is the ONLY thing Democrats are actually great at. Maybe if they start acting like there actually is something to be responsible for, this country might have a sliver of a chance.

[-] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Why do the Dems have to "help" the GOP? I say the GOP isn't helping the Dems! All it would take is a handful of Rs to vote with the Dems to make Jeffries the speaker.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

Asked what Jordan can do to change minds, Armstrong said: “Talk to people, listen to people. He’s really good at it…”

beg to fucking differ, you servile cunt

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh he listened plenty. He just ignored them. That's what they're really interested in. They want somebody who will ignore the truth and continue to support the ongoing insurrection.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago

“People can talk a big game about that. I haven’t personally heard anybody talk about that; it’s only hearsay,” he said. “But I think that’s pretty nuclear. Let’s keep this conventional.”

This quote by a Republican Congressman explains absolutely everything that is wrong about the GOP. The idea of talking to Democrats to see what compromise could take place is considered a "nuclear" option. Keep in mind that had 5 districts gone the other way nationwide, Republicans would be in the minority. But they're talking as if they have an ironclad majority that demands they never compromise on anything.

This party deserves to die.

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

They spelled his name wrong, it’s Gym Jordan.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Gymbo to his fellow insurrectionists.

[-] kibiz0r@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So…

The second-largest voting bloc (moderate Republicans) is angry at the first-largest voting bloc (Democrats) for voting for their preferred candidate, cuz they think they’re entitled to the votes of the third-largest voting bloc (MAGA Republicans).

Makes sense.

Edit: Not sure why I got down-dooted to oblivion right off the bat. ¯\(ツ)

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Fuck you mean “trashing”?

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Clickbait. Common in journalism nowadays.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Defending bigotry with soft language, common in journalism nowadays.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Not you, the headline trends

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] duckCityComplex@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

At the risk of sounding like a hopeless optimist... Wouldn't it make sense for the Republicans to nominate more of a centrist with promises to work on common ground with the Democrats (whatever narrow terrain that may consist of now) and thereby sideline the MAGA crew to irrelevancy?

Yeah they would take a lot of heat from Trump & co., but maybe they could actually pass something for their constituents.

[-] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

On the one hand, yes, but the Republicans made it so any one person can call for a vote to oust the speaker, so it only takes one unhappy rep to restart the cycle.

So I think the current plan is to just sit back and let the American people see that the current batch of Republican reps has as much ability to work together as a bag of weasels until the Republicans are willing to actually admit that they fucked up and ask for help fixing it.

So this could take a year to resolve.

[-] leds@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago

But wouldn't a moderate speaker supported by the majority from both parties easily survive a vote like that?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 14 points 1 year ago

Their "moderates" were the anti-Trumpers.

They got primaried and voted out.

[-] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm sure we will find out. It sounds good in theory, but I'm not sure how many true moderates may be left. We seem to be in a "compromise is weakness stage"

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Even if Dems wanted to help sincerely, why would they aid a party whose platform is to harass the shit out of everyone else. Nevermind the fact that the staffers are probably still dealing with the fear from Jan 6 in therapy; helping get Jim Jordan up of all people is voting for a dude who indirectly tried to kill you. The idea of even asking for that is so weird to me.

[-] NightLily@lemmy.basedcount.com 3 points 1 year ago
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago

House Minority Leader needs to nominate an r they can work with. That will turn up the heat.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
465 points (97.7% liked)

News

23305 readers
3619 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS