this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
800 points (98.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

9185 readers
394 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 153 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I grew up in the 1970s. We were eating candy cigarettes. πŸ˜„

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was eating those in the 90s...

[–] Custard@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But they're completely white now, back in the day they had the red tip and a "filter"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I had them in the '80s definitely, maybe even into the '90s in the US. They're still sold in Japan today (chocobaco or something like that).

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re still sold in the US too, just as β€œcandy sticks.”

β€œBig League Chew” the bubble gum was also supposed to resemble tobacco chew.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 7 points 1 year ago

I loved big-league chew and bubble tape when I was growing up.

Edit: and I can't forget Bazooka. Also, shitty trading card pack gum (for nostalgia but not flavor).

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely had these growing up in the 90s. Though not as popular, candy stores still sell them today.

[–] Sprinks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember eating them in the early 2000s and then them vanishing from nearly ever store. I still see them in candy shops, but rarely and usually tucked away on the bottom shelf. I also remember those thick, bubble gum, cigars.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jonesy@aussie.zone 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We had these in Australia but they were called something way worse...

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 22 points 1 year ago

Fags, delicious fag sticks

Shove em in my mouth suck on them all day

I looked cool as hell with a fag in my mouth

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jonesy@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was after the original name became... problematic.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We had the same issue with the "negerzoenen" in the Netherlands (negrokisses translated). They changed it to "zoenen" or "chocozoenen".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Bro 90s sweets?

Gushers

String thing

Dunkaroos

Choco tacos

Squeezits

Fruit by the foot

Fruit rollups.

If you know anyone in their late 30s to early 40s, be surprised they have teeth.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of nostalgia, I purchased a choco taco. Turns out they sold the company like 20 years ago, changed the recipe to cheaper, quicker to stale waffle cone, made the ice cream a plainer flavor, removed the cacao from the chocolate, etc. What a truly awful thing to trick someone into eating.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh my god, the new ones are so nasty. Legitimately why even bring them back like that? There is no way people purchase those consistently.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn’t. They’ve been discontinued for years, citing a desire to make their supply lines sturdier for their other products. Translation-people did not want to eat their garbage tacos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nysqin@feddit.org 20 points 1 year ago

Me, as a European:

[–] lath@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You mean you no longer have your candied plastic vampire teeth?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah the kids of 1998 had damn near day-glo insides from all the artificial dyes and weird preservatives we ingested lmao

Man the β€˜90’s was when store bought processed food was a sign of wealth and everyone wanted to go to McDonald’s or Pizza Hut for birthdays.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How did you miss the three most popular candies of the late 90s: jolly ranchers, airheads, and warheads?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I mean if I wanted to go for the tooth decay showstopper: jujubees.

Hey parents! Kid got a loose tooth you want to just get out of their mouth already? Jujubees.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Be unsurprised if they have diabetes

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 69 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Of course we didn’t have iPhones then. We had a pet in a small box and it died if you didn’t press the buttons the right number of times every day.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago

I've recently been feeling nostalgic for Tamagochi. The Minigames were kind of fun, I think. At least I remember them positively, but that might be rose tinted, I was a primary schooler then haha.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Coldgoron@lemm.ee 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah yes I remember the sound of dial up modems and churning butter like yesterday.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oddly enough, I did churn butter in the 90's. I mean, it was only one time and it was part of school, learning about how butter is made. But I did it!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I like how they also failed to show a picture of a baked sweet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dr_Box@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Does putting a jumbo marshmellow on a saltine cracker and nuking it for 15 seconds in the microwave count as a baked sweet?

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Depends how baked you are when you make it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Ah, that's a good point. 1898 makes a lot more sense for baking your own sweets.

The 1990s was a big decade for processed foods

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bitch, I spent hours on illegally copying a disc of age of empires I borrowed from a class mate. I didn't even have a walkman anymore (I do now, ironically)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Born in '86, I remember when classmates were shivving each other for Pokemon cards and Pogs.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Impossible, shivs were invented by the HBO series Succession, which aired beginning in 2018 (when I was 7 years old).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Excuse me while I go crumble into dust and blow away.

Also, holy shit, at least where I was the late 90s were peak β€œlow fat” (high sugar) product times, there was SO much sweet garbage to buy. If anything more than there is now, because now there’s the mindset among most people that we should probably cut back on sweets.

[–] Warehouse@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

1998, where if you had home made desserts instead of Oreos, Pop tarts and lunchables, people assumed you were poor!

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 14 points 1 year ago

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Oh yes I was born in 1990 those good old days where there were no cars, no electricity, no plumbing, no vaccines, people weren’t going to school ah yes the good old days

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You wouldn't last 10 ticks inna twencen hood, choom. Eddies down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah yes as we know people in the 19th century didn't purchase sweets like coca cola (1886) and Turkish delight (conflicting data but could go back to 1777, the Byzantine empire, or sefavid Persia but possibly earlier). Also as we know the concept of markets is a crazy new idea and we have absolutely no extensive written records of ancient civillians having markets where people would barter and trade goods.

/s

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I often refer to 2000 as the turn of the century, and it causes confusion among old people. I'm old, too, BTW.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Back in the day, much of the fiction people saw was set in the past. You saw Marie Antoinette and Cleopatra in cartoons and commercials. Sup0erman met Sitting Bull. Today there are very few shows / movies set in the past, so people don't have the same perspective.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've noticed this too. It feels like we're culturally losing touch with even the relatively recent past, and I'm not sure what to think about it.

I guess it concerns me in the "those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it" kind of way.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like so many things, it goes back to Ronald Reagan.

Reagan loosened up the rules on children's TV. That let the networks/advertisers run half hour long commercials with names like "GI Joe" and "Masters Of The Universe." Back in the day, the folks writing Bugs Bunny could put anyone in a cartoon, but the new guys were being pushed to create characters that could be sold as toys. The same applies to movies. The studios would rather finance a science fiction movie with a dozen tie-in products than a historical picture that has a bunch of public domain characters.

As always, look for the money trail.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί