this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
410 points (97.7% liked)

USpolitics

744 readers
372 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/8171943

Bear with the slightly extreme wording of the copy-paste below from Reddit - it's actually very similar energy to the actual Executive Order if you want to read the direct source instead.

This Executive Order does the following:

❧ All federal agencies, including independent regulatory commissions, are now subject to direct White House control.

❧ Regulations cannot be issued without presidential approval.

❧ The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) can now withhold funding from independent agencies if they don’t align with White House priorities.

❧ All federal employees must follow the President’s and Attorney General’s interpretation of the law, eliminating legal independence.

❧ A White House Liaison is to be installed in every independent regulatory agency to enforce direct presidential control.

⚠️ This is the biggest executive power grab in U.S. history. ⚠️

This formally ends the concept of an “independent” regulatory agency, dismantling one of the last barriers to absolute executive power.

📍 This order effectively erases the last major restraints on executive power. 📍 The federal government no longer operates with checks and balances. 📍 Regulations and laws are now dictated solely by the President. 📍 If left unchecked, this is the moment the U.S. ceases to function as a democratic republic.

1️⃣ The President Now Controls All Regulatory Agencies

✅ The SEC, FTC, FCC, and FEC are no longer independent.

The Stock Market is now subject to White House control, enabling insider trading, favoritism, and targeting of political opponents. Antitrust laws can be selectively enforced, allowing administration-friendly monopolies to expand unchecked. Political opponents in the tech sector, media, or finance can be targeted with regulatory action while allies are protected. Elections are now influenced by direct White House oversight of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

✅ The FDA, EPA, and consumer protection agencies are fully politicized.

Drug approvals, food safety regulations, and environmental policies can be rewritten for political or corporate interests. Climate change regulations can be erased overnight. Scientific research is now subject to White House approval before public release.

🚨 Implication: There is no longer any neutral enforcement of economic, environmental, or election laws. Everything is now dictated by political loyalty.

2️⃣ The White House Can Block Agency Budgets or Direct Funds Elsewhere

✅ The OMB can now adjust funding allocations for independent agencies.

This gives the President the power to defund agencies without needing Congress. Regulatory agencies that challenge presidential policies will be quietly strangled of resources. Agencies loyal to the President will receive full funding—even illegally. 🚨 Implication: Congress no longer controls federal spending on regulatory enforcement. The executive branch can choke out opposition agencies and reward allies.

3️⃣ The President & Attorney General Have Final Say on All Legal Interpretations ✅ All federal employees must follow White House interpretations of the law.

The Attorney General’s opinions override agency lawyers, inspectors general, and independent counsel. Agencies cannot adopt their own interpretations of legal statutes—everything must align with the President’s views. The President can rewrite federal legal interpretations overnight. 🚨 Implication: Legal consistency is gone. Agencies cannot push back against corrupt, illegal, or unconstitutional directives because the President’s interpretation is the only interpretation allowed.

4️⃣ Installing White House Liaisons in All Regulatory Agencies ✅ A “White House Liaison” will be placed in every independent agency.

This ensures constant presidential oversight of daily operations. These liaisons will report agency actions back to the White House and enforce political compliance. Agency directors will no longer have the ability to act without White House approval.

🚨 Implication: There is now a direct enforcement arm inside every regulatory body. Even agencies that resist presidential control will be internally monitored and controlled.

📍 Every regulatory body—from financial markets to environmental protections—is now politicized. 📍 Congress no longer controls federal funding—agencies must obey the White House or risk defunding. 📍 The President’s legal interpretations override all agency autonomy, eliminating independent enforcement of federal laws. 📍 The federal bureaucracy, once designed to be resistant to corruption, is now completely subject to presidential loyalty.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can't happen unless others let it happen

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Those who have the power to actually do anything about it are letting it happen.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It’s already happening.

[–] orize@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So it will totally happen? 😅

Looking at congress...sobbing

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More commonly known as a dictatorship.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the summation.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just like playbook of communists of russia 😂 I wonder how reps are going to tell this for themselves? US has become 47th oblast of russia. Nice, two hundred years of democracy ruined just in two months.

I think you are correct. Especially the thing about "liaisons," reminds me of the political officers in the Soviet Union. They were the pillars of a reign of terror.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hey I saw this in a movie.

The citizens did not have a good time, and (spoilers) >!it didn't end well for the president or his staff either.!<

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/civil_war_2024

[–] Acidbath@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I think about this movie on a daily basis. I'm fucking scared. I don't know what else to say.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

the Enabling Act already?

Lol "potentially"? Dude, it's happening undefended. There's no "potentially." It's here.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Well, when the IRS says I owe taxes, I'm going to ask to see the notes that Trump used to work that out.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

We ran out of noble blue blood. You get greedy-green blood, dollar tree discount "royals". Sorry!

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (11 children)

LOL, this is going to get tossed out by the courts as quickly as the funding freeze was.

Putting "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered" in front of something unconstitutional doesn't magically make it constitutional.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

LOL, this is going to get tossed out by the courts as quickly as the funding freeze was.

You still believe in something, huh?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The alternative is to feign cynicism while surrendering.

"Nothing can be done, the courts can't do anything, we should just stop trying" is actively harmful in this situation.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"The courts can do something' is a bigger barrier to effective action than doomerism, especially if it isn't true

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's blatantly illegal and unconstitutional. The courts will order them to stop, and those court orders will be ignored.

[–] ninja@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's funny that the supreme court didn't consider that consequence of telling the president that he's immune to the courts.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

Yeah... they definitely didn't consider this happening. Certainly wasn't the plan /s

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Like trump gives a fuck what happens in the courts at this point. He’s just going to do it. The scotus gave him ultimate power and they are so busy sucking his balls dry they won’t stop this. Not to mention all the lower courts where the path is being set to replace all the judges with his loyal subjects.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That doesn't matter. The only reason the law has the ability to stop anyone from doing anything is that if you refuse for long enough, eventually, someone will show up with a gun to force the issue. If he knows that won't happen, he can act with impunity.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly as expected and foretold.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, as of Feb. 12 2025 no U.S. federal body can be accepted as credible. All information flowing from the CDC, department of education, energy, health and human services, EPA, FDIC, DOJ and on and on and on. All federal bodies should be IGNORED until credibility is returned.

All of the employees should just go home at this point and let it all collapse so the courts and legislature are forced to act.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All federal bodies should be IGNORED until credibility is returned.

Sounds of planes crashing into one another

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I mean why imagine? It’s already happening

[–] Pirky@lemmy.world 101 points 2 days ago (10 children)
[–] Pondis@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I never expected a country like the US to become a Nazi state. I'm amazed the American people aren't more out raged.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

There is no "American people" ideologically. We're very much a nation at war with itself. Not enough of the decent people voted, so the assholes won control of the government.

[–] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Really? I feel like the writing has been on the wall for quite some time.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The Nazis took many notes from the Race Science and White Supremacy of America

https://www.democracynow.org/2020/8/12/caste_isabel_wilkerson

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ford Motor Company was the primary vector for distribution of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The company was flush with 19th century Groypers.

load more comments (5 replies)

Yeah but like Poland shouldn't have started a war with Germany

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wolf-PAC, we might need that constitutional convention sooner rather than later...

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.gregabbott.com/texasplan/

Governor Greg Abbott Calls for an Article V Convention of States to restore our Constitution

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fucking Greg Abbott of all people...

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This makes me highly suspicious of it. I think it could be a good idea, but I do not trust him as far as he can run.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since the GOP controls Congress, could they amend the Constitution to give Trump specifically, absolute power? Like they basically say Trump is no longer subject to checks and balances?

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

70% control required of congress to amend the constitution

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah? who's gonna enforce that

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Taking a sharpie to the Constitution is predicated on people acknowledging the changes.

We barely give a shit about the document in its current state. I'm hard pressed to imagine a Unitary Executive's rewrites would matter since it's been Calvinball Rules since Marbury v Madison.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago

Welp, time to gear up for war.

load more comments
view more: next ›