this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
539 points (99.8% liked)

politics

20359 readers
3119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

880 billion dollar for would literally be eliminating Medicaid, hope everyone who voted trump and Republicans are good with this, especially those who are poor and have kids with special needs.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a very strange phenomenon, where people are doing things that appears to help them short term, while actually just screwing themselves entirely. Dooming their entire segment of the population because they simply don't have anyone standing there with violence on hand, telling them: NO! Pretty fucking weird, it would be like me, a dude angry from actions taken against me, harassing my neighbors by stealing their packages. It's definitely going to get the wrong kind of attention, and no ones gonna be on my side for doing it... That's what the GOP is doing. Fucking morons.

[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Trump specifically said medicare and medicaid will be protected at all expense. Just last week. We shall see.

[–] chetradley@lemm.ee 31 points 4 days ago

The whole aim of the GOP is to benefit rich people. They're bought and paid for by the 1%. All of their culture war fear mongering is set up as a distraction from the fact that we're losing the class war.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 108 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Why is everyone surprised? This what republicans wanted. This is what they campaigned for. If you haven't been listening carefully for the past few years, this is exactly what they've always wanted.

This is no surprise.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 51 points 5 days ago (1 children)

my fellow americans are various forms of illiterate.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Willfully ignorant. They know they'll never reach whatever passes for the American dream these days. But as long as people with darker skin are hurt more they'll be happy to watch wealthy people on TV. **Voyeur Capitalism ** is what I call it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

for the past few years

This has been the Republican project for decades.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 30 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The thing I don't really get is that we've got a few people on their way to being trillionaires. That's more money and assets than the human brain is capable of fathoming, I can guarantee it. What's even the point? Anything they could possibly want or need is provisioned for, they've got enough money to do all the fun little side projects their hearts desire, and they've still got far more money beyond that. They literally can't even give it away fast enough if they tried. What on earth is more tax breaks for the wealthy going to achieve, even for the wealthy? It just feels pointlessly evil at this point.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a mental illness that is worshiped by an unfortunately large population of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think they're like mold or cancer cells, or even a fire. You can't decide to be a billionaire just like a plant species can't decide to grow in crack in the pavement. It's a system of interactions that decides that. Pure chance and a lot of failures that had as much right to succeed as any other.

Billionaires are byproducts of our system weaved into a physical human body. It has a human life to confuse you and camouflage what it really is. It has a human brain and human emotions to generate reasons why it deserves to exist. It looks and feels like a person.

Reminds me of mandrakes from Harry Potter. They scream like they're alive but they're just there to be harvested.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 days ago

Reminds me of mandrakes from Harry Potter. They scream like they're alive but they're just there to be harvested.

Funnily enough, this is exactly how billionaires view us.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Remember that those evil billionaires don't actually care about the money itself. If they did, they would have stopped at $100 million or some much lower number, because that's already more money than anyone could ever spend. To them it's about power, prestige, and control. They are addicts, and they'll never give up the chance for more.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 days ago

A lot of people are going to die under this regime :/

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 67 points 5 days ago

Don't worry, they'll destroy a lot more than that. The entire US economy is about to be absolutely shredded.

[–] Yodan@lemm.ee 57 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm almost 40 and my whole life I've always known I would NEVER see a dime I paid into social security or medicare or anything taken from taxes. 30% of my life robbed because old greedy people are always in charge and can't see beyond their last 2 years on earth at all times.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's worse than that. If wages had kept pace with productivity (thanks Reagan), we would have been working 2-3 day workweeks at full wages for over twenty years by now.

They literally stole over half of our lives. That amounts to class genocide.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Thanks for catching up to the rest of the class. 🙄

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 37 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I have family members who moved from state to state around 20 years ago until they found one that would approve their disability statuses so they no longer had to work and would qualify for the whole smorgasbord of government assistance programs including medicaid.

They think most people who are receiving these benefits are just lazy and that there would be more money for people like themselves who need that money if these programs were slashed. They believe only those other (i.e. lazy) people will lose benefits.

There's literally no reasoning with that mentality. They seem to think this is all entertaining.

I guarantee you that once they are personally affected, and I'm pretty sure they will be affected at some point, they'll turn on this administration.

I have many problems with this, but the hardest pill to swallow is that I'm going to have to be the bigger person and accept them with open arms because at the end of the day there's no stopping this unless we're all united.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Public assistance does not pay anything but poverty wages. Certainly not enough to move from state to state shopping for the best food stamps and Medicaid deals. While I don't disagree with your judgement of their character I do take issue with "smorgasborg" of government assistance.

Adult public assistance, SNAP, Temporary Assistance for needy families are all very limited. They are resource tested and income approved as well. Not to mention work requirements for any cash assistance except APA. BTW APA benefits are usually around $400-600 a month. Sounds very lucrative considering it is designed to supplement people making less that $1,200 a month in Social Security Benefits.

Anyone who has had to apply for disability knows it is a crap shoot as well. It is common for people to apply over the course of several years before being approved for an amount no human can live off of without subsidized housing. That is if they can even find subsidized housing.

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If my statement could be interpreted in any way congruent to your first paragraph, then there's clearly been a significant degree of miscommunication and/or misunderstanding.

I've reread my statement and there's no mention of shopping around for the best deal, so I'm going to chalk that one up to you misunderstanding what I wrote. As for the use of smorgasbord, I understand that it might suggest abundance in some way, though in my part of the world it generally conveys the concept of variety more so than abundance. Either way I chalk that up to miscommunication on my part.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GuyFawkes@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I hope they get what they voted for. And I will NEVER accept them. They made this mess, it’s on their shoulders, pocketbooks, and well-beings to fix it.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I guarantee you that once they are personally affected, and I’m pretty sure they will be affected at some point, they’ll turn on this administration.

Will they?

What are their news habits? Facebook? Cable TV? Are they politically active?

A root cause of all this is that scamming/influencing is extremely effective with modern tech, especially on vulnerable people. If something bad happens, they will just get pushed down the rabbit hole waiting to suck them in.

Nothing will change until that’s regulated away, which is not going to happen now that The owners of Twitter and Truth Social are president, and Meta has their ear.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe.. Or you tell them to get fucked and pull themselves up by the boot straps. Why have shitty people in your life?

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I already mentioned it: I firmly believe that if there's any chance of stopping this mess, it's going to require working together and finding common ground with everyone who has been harmed, regardless of voting history, political affiliation, morals, and rationale. Divided we fall. We've already seen how being divided works out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] turdburglar@lemm.ee 34 points 4 days ago

yeah, we know.

but thanks anyway to the economists for making it official with numbers.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago

Republicans - Yes, that was the plan.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 36 points 5 days ago (3 children)

41% of births and the biggest portion of maternity care are covered under Medicaid. Highest is Louisiana at 64%. Combine this with abortion restrictions and potential loss of access to labor and miscarriage related drugs and you're looking at lots more dead pregnant people, dead fetuses, and dead infants and far fewer rural hospitals handling any sort of reproductive care.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

Because Republicans think that that 64% is mostly black and brown people getting a handout.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

This is precisely the outcome that they desire.

Almost certainly, it shall be achieved.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Hurt the poor and reward the rich?

Mission Accomplished!!!

/s

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago

Isn't that the entire GOP platform, in a nutshell?

Sure, they have to throw red meat to racist dumbasses to get them to vote for them...

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Removing regulations and dismantling the government doesn’t help anyone but the rich.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I once stumbled on a discussion, on Reddit I think (or maybe it was Twitter) from a small-time farmer who basically admitted that most farmers in his position realized regulations were important and could be a force for good, but large agri-businesses constantly flouted rules and never got anything more than a slap on the wrist when caught. A sort of "rules for thee, not for me" situation. And so all the small time farmers had to cut corners and ignore regulations to remain competitive and viable.

Overly complex regulations could increase the barrier of entry for newer companies, small time entrepreneurs, etc. In some instances it can actually be in the interest of large, established companies to maintain overly complex regulatory environments as it keeps competition out of the market.

Insightful simplification of regulations that increases their effectiveness while reducing unnecessary burdens might be feasible, and also, beneficial for society as a whole.

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like we're going to get that with this administration. They're just going to smash and break, and at best, they might realize they broke some important things and perhaps repair it to a limited extent.

edit: clarified a few points.

It’s not a bug, it’s a feature of reinforcing the hierarchy the conservatives all believe in.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Normal GOP budget.

[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They say that as if destroying programs that benefit the common people and instituting policies that benefit the 1% are some sort of unexpected consequences rather than the exact and explicit point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 days ago

Same is it ever was.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What happened to "The American Way" that Superman was fighting for? Would he be ashamed now?

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

What happened to "The American Way" that Superman was fighting for?

The same thing that happened to truth and justice.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago

Superman was always fighting for people .... rich white people .. you know Americans.

/s /sarcasm /this_is_sarcasm

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Yes the GOP is made of GOP

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›