this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
542 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

18982 readers
1579 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 51 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How about just 0 and 1? They didn't specify what base.

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 45 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Could also say pi is just 10 in base π

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

9 (the base pi number) doesn't exist because all digits must be less than pi. 9 (the base 10 number) is apparently roughly 22.2021120021 in base pi.

Edit: a bit of explanation for that last one, it's because 2π + 2 + 2/π + 2/π^3^ + 1/π^4^ ≈ 8.99

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Technically they didn't specify what number their use of the symbol '9' represents!!!!!

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

They wanted to know how to represent 6, but displayed upside down.

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

would all integers necessarily be irrational in base π?

[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Except for 0, 1, 2, 3.

Integers are necessarily irrational because π is transcendental and not an algebraic number.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 11 months ago

how are you defining irrational? the definition i know is not base dependent.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

If you wanted it spelled right, you should have talked to an englisher

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

matematician

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago

a matematician specializes in palgebra

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is the decimal point a digit, or a character?

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 11 months ago

Must be - a digit would be beside the point here.