321
submitted 1 year ago by HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

Weird. I keep hearing the deranged nuts saying it's murder. Are they OK with 2 years for murder? Why are they so easy on criminals?

Our do they subconsciously know it's not actually murder?

[-] Labtec6@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 year ago

These religious nuts forget it's condoned in the Bible too.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

There's a part of the Bible that talks about swelling the belly that can be considered vague enough to ignore. Although I think it's pretty obvious what it's talking about.

But the Bible is 100% crystal clear about fetuses being property and absolutely not a living human. In fact, I think it's a bit extreme in that it says if you cause a miscarriage you just have to pay a fine.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Depends on the version. Some versions of Numbers 5:11-31 mention the bitter drink causing a miscarriage if the wife is unfaithful.

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Its still a normal murder sentence, they're just planning on aborting it before term.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's only a tiny bit of murder, so a tiny murder sentence

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was before they changed the law to disallow abortions after 12 weeks. This also is not exactly a case abortion advocates want to fully stand behind. She was like 28 weeks along and the mother ordered the pills saying they were for herself. She coached the daughter on how to take them and the daughter was happy to take them saying shit like she could not wait to wear jeans again. They then burned the stillborn and buried it in a friend's yard. Most of the case is about improper disposal of a body.

I'm very pro-choice but the daughter should have been the one consulting a doctor to get the pills and they should have worked with the city/county to properly dispose of it.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

This also is not exactly a case abortion advocates want to fully stand behind.

Fuck that. Women have bodily autonomy. Period. No "but", they just do. None of your things to consider matter at all except that a law which criminalizes women's bodily autonomy at 20 weeks forced them to take medical risks they shouldn't have had to take.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You won't ever get a majority of the population to agree to this view. If you hold staunchly that all the way up until 40 weeks women should be allowed to abort, you will lose at least 75% of the vote. At some point the fetus is developed enough we have to consider its life, regardless of its current location.

I think we could push viability as a compromise for everyone. That's around 21-24 weeks, depending on what is considered acceptable potential life chance. Conservatives will say that's too developed, some progressives will claim your view, but I think most would at least compromise that if we could safely take the baby out, that should be the legal option at that point. That also gives the mother a lot of time to consider her options.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Many fatal fetal anomalies aren't detected until the scan done between 18-23 weeks. So that doesn't "give the mother a lot of time." Especially in states that add legal hoops for her to jump through, and where the nearest place to perform an abortion is several hundred miles away in another state. Usually in those cases she's forced to put the dying fetus through much more trauma, as well as the risk to her own health and life. You can tell yourself they'll make exceptions in those cases but the reality is they won't act until she's crashing from sepsis, because they fear (with good reason) being reported and arrested and losing their license.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] KeyserSoze61@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Seems like a good trade off. 2 years in prison < 18 years in prison. Anyway, fuck Nebraska.

[-] Nunar@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

Let's not forget that this is because Meta gave away Facebook messages that they thought were private. Do not use Facebook messenger! Or SMS!!

[-] bobman@unilem.org 36 points 1 year ago

Jeez, that should be the headline.

"Facebook exposes messages that land a mom in prison for giving her daughter abortion pills."

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Never trust Facebook, get a real E2E messenger app like signal

[-] charles@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

E2E is not enough. You can still be subpoenaed for Signal messages if they aren't auto-deleted. Just ask all the folks involved in the trump indictments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

"Facebook exposes messages that land a mom in prison for giving her daughter health care treatment."

Pregnancy is a medical condition with possibly lethal health risks and abortion is a treatment for those that don't accept those risks.

Abortion is health care.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

They own WhatsApp too

[-] Crocrodile@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Does anyone have an article that describes point by point why Facebook is harmful? I'm having trouble getting my friends to switch to signal.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

This is where the real injustice comes in.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 8 points 1 year ago

Very interesting, though I wonder how much that would've actually changed ... anything?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't know if it would have change anything, but it did violate a legal right for a spurious reason and that is an injustice regardless of her sentence.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

WTF USA? SMH

[-] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This headline is a bit misleading. She didn’t just help her daughter have an abortion, she helped her have a late-term abortion, and then burnt & buried the remains.

“According to prosecutors, after the pair bought pills to end the pregnancy, Celeste Burgess gave birth to a stillborn fetus. At the time, Nebraska law banned abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Celeste Burgess’s pregnancy was well past that point, according to court records.

Police say that the Burgesses buried the fetal remains. An examination of the remains suggested they may have also been burned, according to court documents.”

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

What a horrifying hellscape Nebraska must be for a mother and daughter to feel the need to go to such lengths for healthcare.

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is what happens when states destroy access to reproductive healthcare. Desperate people do stupid things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I really wish people would stop using the phrase "late term abortion". It's not a medical term. It's a political one designed demonize those who almost solely terminate for medical reasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] match@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

She should cross the border into Colorado, Polis would shelter her

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
321 points (95.0% liked)

News

23282 readers
3803 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS