778
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] neutralbipolar2@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Someone gotta tell Will.I.Am to change his name to reflect his relevancy

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

He just released a single with Britney Spears. So I guess they're both pretty thirsty right now.

(Not to get totally off-topic, I just saw that in the news and I was like, wow, it's 2012.)

[-] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I think you meant Britnied Speared.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Elton John did a single with Britney Spears not too long ago. I don’t hate it, if I’m being honest.

[-] Hyphlosion@donphan.social 11 points 1 year ago

Racecar spelled backwards is racecaR.

[-] str82L@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Hang on, past tense of Will is not Would! Maybe Did?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] mycodesucks@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It SAYS that, but regardless of the source, don't believe everything you read on the internet.

Will and would are both modal auxiliary verbs, and as such, don't actually have a past tense in the sense other verbs do. They don't have participles either. You don't have "woulding" or "woulded", and neither has a present or past tense either. Even if you wanted to argue it, what's the past tense of other modal auxiliaries? What's the past tense of "may"? Or "should"? And before you say "May have" or "should have", then why isn't the past tense of "will" "will have?"

The same is true of "can" and "could". Could is NOT the past tense of "can" because a past tense for a modal auxiliary verb is nonsensical. What they MEAN when they write that is "could is a verb that can be used in place of can in some situations to refer to the ability to do something having taken place in the past", but they are different words that happen to share related usage.

In the case of "will"/"would", not even THIS makes sense. Will is used as an indicator to shift the following verb's action into the future. The past tense of shifting something into the future means... what? Making something hypothetical?

While calling these verbs "past tense" is a functional shorthand for explaining their function, the reality is modal auxiliaries do not have tenses or other forms, and it's disappointing to see the British council screw this up.

[-] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

You seem smart, I will follow you.

[-] mycodesucks@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Nah, I'm an idiot who happens to be an English teacher for foreign language speakers. Nitpicking bad language rule explanations is my job.

[-] quindraco@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It's weird even thinking of "will" as a verb. It involves no action, unlike every other verb.

"I will." is like the sentence "You dolt." Neither contains any action. I'm willing to accept linguists think of the word as a verb, but I'm also deeply confused why they would.

[-] Still@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

you dolt is a shortening of you are a dolt are is the verb and ar is implied in the shortened version

[-] Creyapnilla@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well if I wouldn't has didn't did?

[-] DeeVal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I remember seeing a meme about that in my english teacher's classroom back in high school

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
778 points (97.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26703 readers
977 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS