477
submitted 1 year ago by EdenRester@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

For the first time in the United States, research with cephalopods might require approval by an ethics committee.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 year ago

The fact that there wasn't already bothers me. Octopodes are extremely intelligent creatures and we've known this for a while. Not that I think intelligence should be how we base our treatment of animals, but it is one of the bigger factors when laws about this sort of thing get made, so I would have expected it to be taken into account before now.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Don't trust an octopus. Ever. You heard it from me first.

[-] SimplePhysics@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Well, I don’t trust squids either, specifically ones that fly…

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You wouldn't be where you are today if it weren't for us.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you flying squid people. 🙇

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They have so many arms, it's practically impossible to see when they cross their fingers behind their back!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Hey. Don't insult the many-armed. The problem is they only have a pitiful 8 instead of a respectable 10.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What kind of sad existence would a being with a measly 10 arms be able to lead? 12, and not fewer, as the gods intended!

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

What a sad, miserable existence armed creatures must live. I just use one of my many eyestalks to do anything an arm could do and more.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

These arms built your entire civilization!

[-] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There was a whole Dollop episode about octopuses. They're pretty smart and probably deserve it.

EDIT: Fixed my plural!

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Fun fact, the plural of octopus is actually octopuses, or my favourite, octopodes!

[-] kirklennon@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

The only one you should ever actually use in English is “octopuses,” which is correctly used by Nature in their article and in the linked NIH proposal. It’s the right term for both everyday use and for academic and legal purposes. Octopus is a common English word and warrants the standard English plural.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Octopuses is the English plural and most commonly used, but I personally use octopodes just cause I just like how it sounds lol.

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly octopuses just sounds awkward anyway

[-] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I need to find this one.

[-] Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Weird they live so short

[-] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 15 points 1 year ago
[-] Cris_Color@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Protections seem probably more important for putting them through unusual experiences that may involve suffering than killing them for food, as that's essentially predation which they experience as a natural part of life

There's an argument to be had that we as humans are intelligent enough to choose not to put animals through that which is why lots of folks choose to be vegan, but eating animals is more of a personal ethical choice, whereas funding research conducted on animals kinda needs to be a societal one given it's funder by other parts of society, and research is generally for the benefit of society; so society needs to be the ones to decide whether the research is ethical. Not sure I articulated quite what I mmea, but hopefully what I'm trying to say makes sense

[-] Jolan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Just because something happens naturally doesnt make it ethical. For example a ton of animals (including humans) cannibalise but that doesn't make it ethical.

[-] Cris_Color@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I agree. I'm not in a position to be vegan myself, but I have a lot of respect for vegan ethics and people who are able to make that sacrifice. But I think it would be a mistake for a government to mandate that you can't consume animal products. Maybe someday? Not sure how I feel on that subject. But I think its appropriate for there there to be safeguards against unethical research, but I think the choice to consume an animal product or not still needs to be an individual choice.

That being said, I think cannibalism is a bad example of something unethical happening in the wild. Cannibalism is taboo and considered unethical by humans because it involves killing a person, the eating them part is just weird and seen as desecration of a corpse in our culture. But its not any more unethical for a preying mantis to eat another preying mantis than it would be for it to eat some other bug. Perhaps a better example would be rape among primates or dolphins? since thats likely to create similar distress in the way it takes a way an animals autonomy as it does for humans. The concept of ethics starts getting a lot muddier when removed from the context it was created in- human society. Ultimately ethics is a manmade construct that by and large just describes pro social behavior, which is why I think rape among primates is likely to be a strong example of something unethical amongst animals: they are social enough have a concept of society and a level of expected behavior from their peers around them.

Regardless, I don't think using the government to mandate that people can't consume animal products would be a mistake, as those who are currently too far from understanding your perspective would be radicalized by it and it would stymy cultural progress towards a more intuitive sense of animal welfare. (I understand that may not be an argument you're making, I'm just kinda expressing my thoughts on the subject since its topical both to your point and the idea someone expressed that maybe eating them should be protected by the government also)

[-] Jolan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Cris_Color@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you :)

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

it's really fucking stupid. We give care and consideration to pets, and if we did to pets what we do to the animals we eat, we'd get locked up for years. It's called speciesism.

[-] psud@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No protections for them

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

otcopodes are actually the animal companions to the aliens. they brought them with because they just love the water.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
477 points (99.6% liked)

News

23267 readers
1241 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS