44

"Why isn't she running away with it?" David Brooks asks. Turns out, it's because of woke! It's also because Democrats insist on hating oil, and generally catering only to the most extreme of the extreme left--if only she would pivot to the center! Some of the most distilled, unfiltered bullshit I've ever seen, even considering the source.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hypercracker@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The parties, they write, “have prioritized the wishes of their most intensely devoted voters — who would never vote for the other party — over the priorities of winnable voters who could go either way.”

how can anybody look at the dems parading dick cheney around while shitting on everybody to the left of reagan and actually believe this

I mean the other way I would state it is actually they've prioritized the needs of people who will literally never vote for them

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago

Yeah it's just bafflingly wrong. He says something a little later about how Kamala is sort of doing what he says, but she just doesn't have time to swing the Democratic priesthood around, and anyway it's all performative and she's really a death to America commie like the rest of them. It's almost breathtaking how incorrect this column is.

[-] Rojo27@hexbear.net 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When parties were primarily political organizations, they were led by elected officials and party bosses. Now that parties are more like quasi-religions, power lies with priesthood — the dispersed array of media figures, podcast hosts and activists who run the conversation, define party orthodoxy and determine the boundaries of acceptable belief.

Wow, he almost gets it, but in the policy example he gives he turns around and gives examples of policy that has been under assault from right wing propaganda. Liberal "priests" as he puts it support things that Americans don't care about.

Like affirmative action isn't popular, but lets ignore years of propaganda that has lead people to believe that unqualified POC are getting jobs over white people. Shifting to renewable energy isn't popular, but lets ignore years of propaganda that tells you that if you move away from fossil fuels you'll be putting thousands of industry workers out of a job and affecting millions who depend on them for their transportation. Immigration policy that doesn't treat migrants like criminals isn't popular, lets ignore the years of propaganda that tell you that only gangs, murderers, and removeds are coming through the borders.

Its such an incredibly stupid way of looking at the issues facing American politics in general. The reality is that the parties are religious in nature because their most ardent supporters, especially the Democrat Party, truly believe that their party actually cares about them and the things they believe in. So no matter what they do materially (increase funding for the police, fund wars and genocide, cut social safety net programs, privatize services, etc) they continue to believe that they actually represent what they believe in. Even when they start to realize that they don't they still come up with ways to justify that suppport (no one is perfect, lesser of two evils).

Honestly I wouldn't expect any better from this out of touch shithead though.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For Brooks, culture is something that's out there, and which arises, fully formed, from some kind of pervasive but nebulous ether. Politics (and economics) is fully downstream of that, and is completely parasitic on this ex nihilo culture. This is pretty much a paradigm case of your brain on idealism zizek-theory: it's the ideas--in the form of culture--that shape our political economy on this view, but not the other way around; politics and power never "act back" on culture, but are forever subservient to ideology. This gets the arrow of causal influence almost perfectly backward. As you say, the predominant beliefs of most Americans are shaped by decades of material conditions--propaganda, immiseration, austerity, and political capture by the richest of the rich. Even if we grant that he's right in describing the views of most Americans (which I think is actually pretty suspect too), Brooks never thinks to interrogate why and how people come to have the views that he attributes to them; we just think what we think, and then shape our world in response to that bundle of ideas that God has placed into our minds. Politicians, on this view, are merely weathervanes whose job it is to act based on the ideological winds, forever hostage to their vagaries and totally unable to shift their direction.

[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago

More from the intellectual giant who brought us "suddenly realizing that everybody else has internal lives and thoughts and existences at the precocious age of his mid fifties"

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

did he have to do drugs about it?

[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

It's been a while since I read it but I think he had to be divorced about it, then had the sudden realization in a train station that all the people around him weren't actually NPCs and had internal lives of their own just like him

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

i can kinda see how young children and teenagers can stumble onto this realization later than others, but to not realize this until fifty? ...at least he got there eventually, I suppose.

It's probably something not uncommon among conservatives, really. The chauvinism at the base of their worldview's gotta come from somewhere, I figure.

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

It's because he started having sex again

Chapo had an amazing reading series on that one, episode 311

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago

No. But he did divorce his wife and marry his much younger assistant.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago

The second thing that baffles me is: Why has politics been 50-50 for over a decade? We’ve had big shifts in the electorate, college-educated voters going left and non-college-educated voters going right. But still, the two parties are almost exactly evenly matched... Usually we have one majority party that has a big vision for the country, and then we have a minority party that tries to poke holes in that vision.

Good observation. It's because both parties have the same vision, voters project whatever they want onto their favored party, and triangulation is a matter of cultural signalling, not setting and meeting political goals.

The parties, they write, “have prioritized the wishes of their most intensely devoted voters — who would never vote for the other party — over the priorities of winnable voters who could go either way.”

Obviously incorrect.

When parties were primarily political organizations, they were led by elected officials and party bosses. Now that parties are more like quasi-religions, power lies with priesthood — the dispersed array of media figures, podcast hosts and activists who run the conversation, define party orthodoxy and determine the boundaries of acceptable belief.

Oh yeah? Podcast hosts? You sure about that man? You don't think it might be about donors, consultants, and think tank fellows?

Harris clearly understands the problem. She has tried to run her campaign to show she is in tune with majority opinions.

Yes! She has! She is following the polls on every issue, just like the last 3 dem candidates! You even said earlier that she is sticking to Biden's policies on everything! So she should be winning, right??

The result is that each party has its own metaphysics. Each party is no longer just a political organism; it is a political-cultural-religious-class entity that organizes the social, moral and psychological lives of its believers.

I can tell someone's been reading Slate Star Codex

Sometimes it seems that Harris is running not to be president of the United States but to be president of a theme park called Democratic Magic Mountain

Wow dude, sick own

world's most infuriating imbecile. needs to be taken out to the alley and put down.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

How detached from reality are these people?

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

Wouldn't it be cool for your job to be "say the dumbest, wrongest shit imaginable to millions of people once a month or so, and get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for doing it?"

[-] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

It's like he saw this clip from Blazing Saddles(CW ableism): But instead of having a nice chuckle he spent the next 12 hours biaoqing-copium his own farts until he could smuglord it into a justification for the Dems to, somehow, be even more regressive

[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15902 readers
373 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS