471
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The FCC is still taking comments from the public about how much data you really use and what your experience with data caps is like.

The Federal Communications Commission is officially looking into broadband data caps and their impact on consumers. On Tuesday, the FCC approved a notice of inquiry to examine whether data caps harm consumers and competition, as well as why data caps persist "despite increased broadband needs" and the "technical ability to offer unlimited data plans," as spotted earlier by Engadget.

Many internet plans come with a data cap that limits how much bandwidth you can use each month. If you go over the data cap, internet service providers will typically charge an extra fee or slow down your service. The FCC first started inviting consumers to comment on broadband data caps last June, hundreds of which you can now read on the agency's website.

You can still share your experience with broadband data caps with the FCC through this form, which will ask for details about the name of your ISP, usage limits, and any challenges you've encountered due to the cap.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 151 points 2 months ago

They exist so that companies can extract additional dollars from each data line.

[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

Its like they can sell you the same ticket to the show twice.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago

More like one charge to have access to the show, and an additional charge for having the audacity to actually watch it.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 months ago

Buh my infrastructureszzzz!

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 102 points 2 months ago

Biden's FCC has been killing it, really nice to see them crack down on data caps with this and the standardized billing info

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How 'bout a double finger fuck Ajit Pai while we're on the subject.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago

That's not enough, a good serving of raw pineapple inside his ass would work better

[-] 9bananas@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

may i offer you a cactus in these trying times?

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

That guy should to be in prison

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For anyone wondering what the FCC in a second Trump Administration will look like: it won't. Look like anything. Because it won't exist anymore.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago

Money.

When something isn't about money or power, then you can actually phrase it like it's a surprise.

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ah, so I can be surprised about the reason why I like pooping in the morning. At least until I get paid for doing it. Or elected.

[-] msage@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

My boss makes a dollar

while I make a dime

That's why I shit

on company time

[-] ech@lemm.ee 60 points 2 months ago

and why they still exist

Does that really require inquiry? It's for more money, fucking obviously.

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 months ago

"We spent six years investigating why a business would want to overcharge customers in order to make more money. What we found shocked us, because businesses were spending that money on finding way to make the world worse."

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

I want to know why upstream bandwidth is so limited too. I have about 300gb of data at home, not much at all by hoarder standards. But there is no decent way for me to back it up to a remote server, because of low upload speed.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago

On cable it’s because they allocate significantly more bandwidth towards download than upload. They could allocate them equally but most customers that are mostly just streaming or playing games care only about the download since it means they can stream/download things faster.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is a "if you build it, they will come" kind of thing. The Internet as we know it developed around the idea that the edge only consumes things. You don't host content there. At most, you give it access to web 2.0 sites where people put their content and then it's shared out from the central server.

It wasn't possible to build applications that were designed for the edge to spread the load around. It's not just a bandwidth problem, either. The slow pace of IPv6 adoption plays a role, and from what I've gathered from using it with Charter, they're only doing enough to make it work at the most basic level. The prefix they give doesn't allow for subnetting, and it appears to be dynamically assigned and can change. Setup isn't that hard, but it's not as easy as it needs to be for mass adoption.

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

If you use something like borg backup the first upload will take you forever but after that all you have to upload is the data that changed. I had the same problem as you and that's how I solved it.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah it would take multiple days and the connection usually doesn't stay up that long. Any idea how well Borg deals with random disconnects and reconnects during a backup?

I do use Borg and like it in general.

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Not sure, I used rclone to upload the archive. Took days for me as well but it worked.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I got FIOS gigabit recently, and was very surprised to find that I now regularly get 300&400mb upload speeds

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Because when cable service was built, the only upstream data was the tiny messages a cable box would send. https://superuser.com/a/1519918

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

This is decades later and most of that stuff has been replaced multiple times by now.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

And only in the past couple years have we been hitting that limit. Maintaining backwards compliance has been more important for cable service. Anyone who had a real need would have used T-carrier service, fiber, or multiple bonded lines, depending on year and budget.

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

They exist to make ISPs more money. Duh

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 months ago

It’s about time.

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Internet providers tried to implement data caps in my country but it got shot down, its sad you guys have to put up with that nonsense

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

What's more disgusting is that cell providers have data caps on tethering. Why the fuck it should matter if I'm using one device via another or how that's even their business is beyond me. If I'm paying for data, just give me what I'm paying for. It shouldn't matter how it's distributed on my own private network/devices.

AT&T and T-Mobile both lost hundreds/thousands of dollars from me because I canceled due to this nonsense.

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I remember experiencing that when I was in the US. Unlimited phone data is rare over here and I was having a blast with it in the US until I tethered my laptop with it to make videocalls to my ex. Two days later they send me a msg saying they will throttle my internet until next billing cycle, wth

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

If they let you use your phone for unlimited tethering, you have no incentive to also pay for their 5g home-wifi router.

[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

when i lived in Bangkok I had to pay for each local wifi IP from the standard router in my apartment which i had to buy from them in order to use a 4G internet subscription service.

It's even more ridiculous than the OP ridiculous greed shittification.

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I pay (converted) USD20 for 600Mb download, 300Mb upload, completely unlimited

[-] DemBoSain@midwest.social 11 points 2 months ago

I actually have competition where I live. No data caps.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

The caps don’t go up either, even though shit uses more data. Xfinity has been at ~1TB forever despite that fact that 4k video uses insane amounts of data now and that downloading 1 video game can easily take 300 GB.

[-] GreyDawn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I remember when the ISP said that we would never need 1TB, it's like 1 million floppies. They knew we would be here needing that data when game downloads are now 150GB+

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I hope they get rid of them.

[-] HorreC@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

this is being brought up from MSFS 2024, lot of nerds in planes were about to get hit with that limit and the FCC is like its time to shine!!

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
471 points (100.0% liked)

News

23627 readers
2448 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS