42
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] atan@lemmy.ml 1 points 37 minutes ago

A tossup between books 7-10 of the Wheel of Time series. I gave up half way through book 10 and resent the time that I wasted on the series. 20 years later I still recall the desperate hope that the next chapter/book would advance the storyline, only to be greeted with more subplots, stupid things happening because of characters inability/unwillingness to communicate, and overly verbose descriptions of every little thing.

I hear the final books, written by a different author, were much better.

[-] faultypidgeon@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

Fourth Wing by Rebecca Yaos. I was expecting a nice fantasy story with dragons and shit. But the romance part of it was just so annoying. "Oh look that dude is so hot..." at every. single. occasion. I could've known beforehand that this book is more targeted towards female readers, but sometimes I just like to go to the book store and buy a book based on the blurb. Since then I made the new rule to keep my distance to books that mention TikTok or #BookTok on the cover.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

I had the same experience! It HAD to have been astroturfing. The reviews were simply glowing but it's honestly one of the worst books I've ever read. It's not even so bad it's good, it's just page upon page of cringe cliche.

[-] demoman@lemmy.one 3 points 12 hours ago

"Into the Wild" by Jon Krakauer. I read it in high school so maybe I wouldn't hate it as much as I do if I wasn't forced to read it, but the plot is basically about a booksmart kid who decides to leave his rich parents and society behind to live in remote Alaska. The book follows Chris McCandless along his journey from the Eastern part of the country, through the South, and finally up the West coast and to Alaska (hitchhiking mostly). When he gets to Alaska, instead of actually being prepared and realizing the risk, he goes into "Into the Wild" incredibly unprepared - he ends up having to stay at his remote camp well into the spring because he didn't consider all the snow melting would render the river blocking his path back to society completely uncrossable. He ends up dying because he ruins most of a moose by failing to properly smoke the meat, and eats a poisionous plant out of desperation. Obviously this could have been avoided by just doing the proper research or bringing extra food (he only brought a few pounds of rice, and the guy who drove him to his final stop literally told him it was a bad idea to do this with so few supplies and only a .22 rifle). Basically his horrible death could have been easily avoided if he wasn't such an idiot.

The author clearly had a ton of respect for the guy, because he spent a year or two peicing all this together. He spoke about Chris (the unprepared trancendentalist wannabe) with a great deal of reverence, acting like he was a martyr for a cause unclear to me. Why you would want to spend years of your life in an attempt to immortalize an idiot, I am not sure. The author also decided to randomly interrupt the main story with a few chapters about his own moronic adventures, which made an already bad book worse.

[-] Soapbox1858@lemm.ee 8 points 22 hours ago

Catcher In The Rye

What a miserable experience reading the whiney thoughts of that little shithead.

Maybe it would have been more relatable if I read it at 15, but I read it at like 28 and it was insufferable.

A close second is The Great Gatsby. I kept waiting for something interesting to happen and then just like that it was over.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Yuuuup. I enjoy Catcher, it's one of my faves but it's greatest asset is also it's biggest flaw. Holden is a convincing mind and thought process of a spoiled teenager. It's great as a character study, but the charcter is an naive and arrogant jerk so being in his mindset is just frustrating.

Honestly reminds me of Lolita, which is a horror story told from the point of view from the monster. You really gotta read in between the lines because the character is actively lying to you. Holden does the same.

I don't fault anyone for not liking either, they are rough reads. But if you're a fan of unreliable narrators then they are a lot of fun.

[-] punkaccountant@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

I actually am a fan of unreliable narrators, but they can’t also be insufferable assholes. I can’t stand that book and I did read it when I was 15!

That said, I understand it’s not really meant to be a cherished story…but if I’m gonna read about someone I would actively hate, I’ll stick to non-fiction for that.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 16 hours ago
[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

of mice and men. its only 100 pages with large lettering and i still couldnt get through it because it was so boring

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

And the moral of the story is "don't trust your friends"...

[-] InputZero@lemmy.ml 7 points 23 hours ago

Foundations by Isaac Asimov. It's a great story but it's a tough read. Way better as an audiobook.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago

I like it but i noticed while reading it that Isaac Asimov has such an optimistic 1950s view, it can be challenging to keep reading with such limited conflict.

[-] boatswain@infosec.pub 1 points 17 hours ago

I really enjoyed the first three: they were pretty obviously just a bunch of short stories set in the same universe. The later books where he tried to write actual novels were not great though. He could do great short stories, but IMO wasn't much of a novelist.

[-] funkforager@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Rich dad poor dad. Rich dad never existed. It’s all made up grift and, consequentially, people fall for it and make expensive life investment decisions after it.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Vaguely remembering what that craze was about, the basic idea that if you have savings you should invest them was good. Not sure if he ever added the diversify and wait patiently bit. Generally all "rich guy books" belong in the trash.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Court of Thorns and Roses. It came highly recommended by my sister and many others.

I get the appeal, an adult retelling of classic fantasy. But it felt like it was written just to be edgey, sexy and proactive. Which is fine if that's what you are wanting, lots of media does this. I was just hoping for a new angle or dimension on Beauty and the Beast, not just a sexy B&B. I guess that does count as a new angle, but not one for me.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Of books I've completed, Thomas Hardy's The Mayor of Casterbridge. Read it at school, hated it (as well as Far from the Madding Crowd and Tess of the D'Urbervilles) - full of ridiculous coincidences. And also utterly miserable to boot.

I started reading The Da Vinci Code, but gave up after the very first page.

[-] Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago

I... actually liked the Da Vinci Code 😶‍🌫️. I think I even read the sequel/ the author's next book. I mean, I was a teenager at the time it came out, looking for some light holiday reading... I think my mum had read it and thought I would enjoy it...

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Ah, fair enough, and each to their own - and to be fair, millions of others apparently liked it too, so maybe I should have kept going! 😁

[-] stationary_melon@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago

I have to agree on the DaVinci Code, it's impossible to get pass the first chapter.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Exactly. And I'm not being a book snob here, I've read plenty of books that weren't the height of intellectualism. But it's so BAD... 😁

[-] BruceLee@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

Any author of the french mouvement réalisme.

[-] kubok@fedia.io 1 points 20 hours ago

I recently hate-read Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco. I had started reading it twice and stopped after a few chapters. I am aware that the book is meant to be satire, but the point of satire is to be to the point instead of having to slog through 600+ pages of drivel.

[-] StopJoiningWars@discuss.online 4 points 1 day ago

Equus. Was forced to read it for highschool English literature class. Never again.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 23 hours ago

I saw it as a play, and it was amazing. Never understood why English teachers have students read plays. The whole point of a play is to have it performed. It's like trying to teach swimming in an empty pool.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago

I just noped out of a book called "Exquisite Corpse" by Poppy Z. Brite. It's torture porn with necrophilia and sadism by the ton. It's actually well written, but I just got sick of it.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the scarlet letter. I found it extremely unrelatable, and generally boring. I think The Crucible play by the same author conveys the same overarching principles about religious hypocrisy and herd mentality in a much more interesting way.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Possibly showing my ignorance here, but The Crucible is by Arthur Miller, and The Scarlet Letter is by Nathaniel Hawthorne - did either of them write a work with the other title as well? I can't find anything to suggest they did, but I might be missing something.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago

Oh, no. you're correct. my mistake. it's been a while.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

No worries, easily done. I meant to say before, I also really like the Crucible - something we studied at school, and yet I still liked it! 😁

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

First school book I ever noped out of.

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago
[-] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

It did cause the world a lot of harm.

[-] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Of the ones I tried to read, Atlas Shrugged, and it's not even close.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 3 points 16 hours ago

It's not the worst book I've read, but Anthem is close. I never had the urge to read Atlas Shrugged after that. The details of the evil, collectivist society are just so over-the-top, and the plot is just such obvious author-wish-fulfillment jack-off-ery. In my head canon, there's an epilogue to the story which picks up a year later: Gaea has died in childbirth due to a breech baby, and Prometheus is crippled from a broken leg that healed badly. Hey, maybe there are benefits to society after all, y'know?

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I tried with it, I really fucking did. But GAWD was it so insufferable to hear how amazing and brilliant all these titans of business were so vastly more intelligent than the rest of the world. I got like a third of the way through before realizing I hated all of the charcters and didn't care abiut what they were doing. So I decided to spend my time elsewhere.

I've read it twice, and I agree. The plot amounts to spoiled, rich children take their ball and go home because they're mad the poors won't let them strip the world of resources for personal gain. The author makes it clear throughout the text that Dagny, Hank, and Galt are the heros for fucking off to larp as robber barons in the 1880's.

As a philosophic text objectivism is naive at best and a cynical justification for authoritarianism at its worst.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 23 hours ago

Why did you read it a second time?

[-] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 hours ago

Because the first time I read it I was a poor and stupid teenager slowly being pulled into an alt-right pipeline. After I figured that out I reread it with a more critical lens for closure.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 13 hours ago

Fair play. Not many would do that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Harry Potter. I tried to read first book but couldn't, the cringyness was high and the naming convention was straight up from 90's bad fantasy book parody. It's like one of the few books i not finished after i started, and i read a lot. And while the others are just forgettable experiences, HP is constantly in my face in media, reminding me of it.

[-] Farvana@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

The first book was a Roald Dahl ripoff, and I enjoyed it for that. Everything was downhill from there.

[-] propter_hog@hexbear.net 1 points 23 hours ago
[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago
[-] propter_hog@hexbear.net 1 points 11 hours ago
[-] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Charles Dickens wasn't fun, back when we covered it in school

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
42 points (92.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43508 readers
1344 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS