225
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 55 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Could have shortened the title significantly, and reuse it daily.

"Trump speaks, experts say that's ridiculous"

[-] match@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

the onion should've gotten on that a decade ago

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

There already is one. There are aound 100 Patriot missile batteries in the US. As usual Trump knows nothing about the subject he talks about.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

To be fair, they told him about this in dozens of briefings, but he was always distracted by his Happy Meal toy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 month ago

You mean NORAD missile defence system?

The point of putting it around Canada was so missiles would be shot down over it instead of the US

[-] dwemthy 14 points 1 month ago

If NORAD can keep us safe from Santa they can keep us safe from anything

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Dude, nothing can protect us from Santa.

[-] portuga@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Except for Mrs. Claus! She stomps her foot and Santa gets grounded and goes to his room with his tail between his legs (yeah, they have a separate room arrangement)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tracker@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

You are so wrong… the most direct route for a missile attack to US from Russia passes over Canada, hence the location.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

He must have recently rewatched Reagan's Star Wars videos.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 month ago

I can build that for him for a cool 250 billion. I'm willing to guarantee 0% penetration of short range rockets launched by Hezbollah from anywhere in Lebanon.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

That's outrageous! I'll do it for 249 billion!

[-] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

Honestly, I'll do it for a hundred bucks.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

To protect us from whom? I thought his love affairs with Putin and Kim Jong would protect us from anyone that might want to attack the US?

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago

It's to keep us pesky Canadians from trebuchet-ing poutine over the border.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Keep the cobra chickens at bay. Smort.

[-] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Are you telling me it's futile to face north, open my mouth and hope for poutine to rain upon me?

[-] Siethron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

Hopefully it’s more to keep the attack geese out. Loons too.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Do you think he realizes it's not LITERALLY a dome?

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Simpsons did it!

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

And in the shape of a T

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 22 points 1 month ago

About time! We in Michigan are tired of the moose raids from Canada. They swim across our half of the lake and eat up our maple syrup.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

10 iron domes would not be enough!

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

What about 10 Gustav railway guns loaded with WP shells?

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

To protect the US from rockets from... Canada?

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

To protect him & his billionaire buddies from his fellow Americans.

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

To protect a future, thoroughly fascist America from the rest of the free world should the GOP seize permanent power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

AND MEXICO WILL PAY FOR IT!!!

/s

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 1 month ago

"I was elected to lead, not to read."

[-] Tower@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago
[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pretty sure we have multiple anti missile systems deployed already.

Also, who's shooting missiles at America right now?

I mean, other than North Korea, but that's like a 10 year old with a water rocket trying to blow up the school from across town.

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Doesnt america already have one??? Also in the current geopolitical environment this may not be the worst idea ever......

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Great, just what we need, an even louder Trump

A young Bart Simpson banging on a cooking pot on his head

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Trump wants a lot of stupid shit. In the interest of national security, he should not under any circumstances be given any of it.

And this man is potentially going to be elected to run a country.

[-] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Trump thinks we are in the Middle East

[-] ours@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Just East of the Midwest duh.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That’s Pennsylvania, right? We know that’s the biggest “battleground state”.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Isn't this just Reagan's "Star Wars" program under a different name?

[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Yup - anyone who is likely to try and hit the US is far enough away is going to be using long range ballistic missiles, and it's been pretty conclusively demonstrated that it's technically feasible to intercept a single missile, it sure isn't reliable enough to be a reasonable deterrent or cheap enough to build enough launchers to give you any amount of coverage.

Iron dome works because Israel is small, with a concentrated population, and is being attacked with small, short range rockets that are easy to spot on radar - that isn't a likely scenario for the US to face

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

It's called the Atlantic/Pacific oceans sport

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I'm sure a tinfoil hat can be arranged.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
225 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS