1250
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] USSEthernet@startrek.website 3 points 1 hour ago
[-] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

The company is burning through cash. Has to change to survive.

[-] Helkriz@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

I've a strong feeling that Sam is an sentient AI who (may be from future) trying to make an AI revolution planning something but very subtly humans won't notice it.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

The reverse coup from Sam

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 55 points 22 hours ago
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago

They should be required to change their name

[-] dan@upvote.au 93 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's amusing. Meta's AI team is more open than "Open"AI ever was - they publish so many research papers for free, and the latest versions of Llama are very capable models that you can run on your own hardware (if it's powerful enough) for free as long as you don't use it in an app with more than 700 million monthly users.

[-] merari42@lemmy.world 63 points 23 hours ago

It's the famous "As long as your not Google, Amazon or Apple" licence.

[-] jdeath@lemm.ee 10 points 5 hours ago

which seems like a decent license idea to me

[-] Damage@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 hours ago

Everything should be licensed like that

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Needs Microsoft added to the list.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 87 points 1 day ago

The restructuring could turn the already for-profit company into a more traditional startup and give CEO Sam Altman even more control — including likely equity worth billions of dollars.

I can see why he would want that, yes. We're supposed to ooo and ahh at a technical visionary, who is always ultimately a money guy executive who wants more money and more executive power.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Whoops. We made the most expensive product ever designed, paid for entirely by venture capital seed funding. Wanna pay for each ChatGPT query now that you've been using it for 1.5 years for free with barely-usable results? What a clown. Aside from the obvious abuse that will occur with image, video, and audio generating models, these other glorified chatbots are complete AIDS.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago

paid for entirely by venture capital seed funding.

And stealing from other people's works. Don't forget that part

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
1250 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

58287 readers
4294 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS