449

“Tonight, Missouri lynched another innocent Black man,” NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nul9o9@lemmy.world 85 points 1 month ago

Everyone from the Attorney General down to the guy giving the lethal injection is a murderer.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

This is also the case for all other executions – it's just state-sanctioned murder – but this case is so clearly awful and a racist lynching that hopefully it starts waking up the people who defend the death penalty.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago

Any human who would willingly deliver the fatal cocktail needs to be locked away far from humanity.

From what I hear, some people salivate over the opportunity

[-] medgremlin@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago

One of the problems these monsters have been having with carrying out executions is that they can't get pharma companies to sell them the drugs they use and they can't find actual healthcare professionals to perform the act. That's why there's been a few cases recently of having to cancel or postpone an execution because they couldn't get the damn IV line in.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Agreed, but here is a fun story about one such man https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaJtZ5cF8Ac

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Governor could have done something, right?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 28 points 1 month ago

He did do something, which was to disband the committee investigating whether this man was wrongfully convicted or not and then later he denied a stay of execution.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Yep, the governor went above and beyond to ensure an innocent man was lynched by the state.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago

They need to stop saying “Missouri” and start calling them out by name. The governor and judge lynched this man.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 56 points 1 month ago

Williams’ attorneys responded that the girlfriend and Cole were both convicted of felonies and wanted a $10,000 reward. They said that fingerprints, a bloody shoeprint, hair and other evidence at the crime scene didn’t match Williams’.

A crime scene investigator had testified the killer wore gloves.

Questions about DNA evidence also led St. Louis Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell to request a hearing challenging Williams’ guilt. But days before the Aug. 21 hearing, new testing showed that DNA on the knife belonged to members of the prosecutor’s office who handled it without gloves after the original crime lab tests.

I thought I read somewhere else his gf rescinded her testimony too. Wouldn't be surprised if the prosecutor did the murder.

[-] cdf12345@lemm.ee 61 points 1 month ago

The prosecution also believes he didn’t have a fair trial

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago

Which is astounding and shows how badly this trial was handled since most prosecutors will still claim someone is guilty even after irrefutable evidence shows they were wrongfully convicted and a judge orders them to be set free.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

Fucking vile. Insane the bloodlust present in too many people in this fucking country.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Look, if you don't test the equipment on innocent people every now and then, how are you going to know if it works on the guilty people? Am I right?

[-] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

We all hope we don't end up in the control group.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Have you tried being white? I hear that helps to avoid it.

[-] marron12@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

And wealthy or well-connected. If you're poor, you don't necessarily have much of a chance.

The link is a long read, but interesting. The story of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was executed in Texas in 2004 for supposedly setting a fire that killed his three kids.

In December, 2004, questions about the scientific evidence in the Willingham case began to surface. Maurice Possley and Steve Mills, of the Chicago Tribune, had published an investigative series on flaws in forensic science; upon learning of Hurst’s report, Possley and Mills asked three fire experts, including John Lentini, to examine the original investigation. The experts concurred with Hurst’s report. Nearly two years later, the Innocence Project commissioned Lentini and three other top fire investigators to conduct an independent review of the arson evidence in the Willingham case. The panel concluded that “each and every one” of the indicators of arson had been “scientifically proven to be invalid.”

[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Like everything else in this backwards cursed fucking place, The Cruelty Is The Point.

[-] 58008@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

TLDR there was a ton of evidence at the scene, including footprints, blood, and DNA on the murder weapon.

None of the physical evidence matched Williams, not the footprints, not the blood, not the DNA on the murder weapon, but because it had not been handled properly, the exonerating evidence was ruled inadmissible.

Witnesses also recanted their testimony that Williams had confessed to them, and the prosecution admitted to striking jurors because they were black. There was zero physical evidence linking Williams to the scene, and zero credible witnesses claiming to have even second-hand knowledge of the crime.

The victim's family and the prosecution had both called for a stay of execution.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It was never about justice.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 month ago

Leave it to the south (Missouri is south-adjacent) to inflict the greatest cruelty. Doesn’t matter if you did it. You need to die.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Good to see a priest being actually pro life here

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Well, with the way prisons are managed, this might be better then dying from heatstroke in a box in the yard. And that's a pretty sad state to be in.

[-] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

How much of this was the state just wishing they didn't have to pay for his life imprisonment?

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Life imprisonment is cheaper than execution in America.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Zero percent. It spent more money executing him than it would have keeping him in prison.

[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago

Quota is quota. American law doesn’t exist to protect, it exists to punish.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It doesn’t rehabilitate, either. Cheaper and more profitable to warehouse people than to offer psychiatric and educational care. Yes, before some pedants tell me that prisons do offer some of these things, I know they do. But they are not the default, and they are not always easily accessed.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago
[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago

Yes, I'm criticizing the AP for not mentioning the man's innocence or lack of evidence and non-recanted witness statements.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Agreed, the headline makes it sound like the family was being merciful despite his conviction. Nope, Missouri just lynched a man.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
449 points (98.7% liked)

News

23296 readers
928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS