191
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Nick Pickles gave shocking testimony in Australia last year that didn't get much coverage in the U.S.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 39 points 2 months ago
[-] Potatisen@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Haha, no way... Poor guy, no wonder he became a pedo.

[-] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

a fantastic name wasted on this piece ..

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

Buried lead:

"...Pickles tried to say that people might be sharing the content “out of outrage” or to “raise awareness,” both very strange answers.

“Accounts dedicated to distributing, accounts engaging in this, we want off Twitter, off X as fast as possible. But there are cases globally where people do share this content out of outrage. And in those cases, we do look at whether removing the content is the appropriate response,” Pickles said at the August 2023 hearing.

But Australian senators clearly weren’t having it.

“Well, I’m sorry, but if I’m outraged by some content, I’m not going to share that to make the point,” Australian Senator Helen Polley told Pickles during the hearing. “But what I would do is, if I am a consumer of that type of material, you’re now just saying, if I just share that in the pretense that I’m outraged, that’s okay.”

Polley pointed out that Australia had laws against allowing people to share child abuse images online, just as every other country does.

“Well, it’s actually a crime. It’s a crime, and it should be suspended permanently,” Polley continued. “There is no excuse whether you’re posting something through outrage, which to me is not logical, that your account should not be permanently suspended.”

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Buried lead:

It's LEDE, not lead.

It took me 40+ years to learn this, just passing it along.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

appreciate it, i enjoy these rabbit holes.

the phrase started out as "bury the lead", but newspaper journalists specifically changed only the spelling, though not the usage or definition, into "lede" because news printers were allegedly worried people would get confused since part of the printing of a newspaper contained the metal lead.

"The use of the alternate spelling of lead in the journalistic phrase “burying the lede” began in the 1970s. Newsrooms began to use the alternate spelling to refer to an article’s opening lines, distinguishing it from a part on the linotype machine made with lead."

https://www.masterclass.com/articles/bury-the-lede-explained#5IbZTCXa3QGtQgw0byJIDQ

either spelling can be used, Merriam Webster has a good article about "lede" too, with more examples and context, explaining that writers

"...attributes the fondness for the spelling to nostalgia, calling it "an invention of linotype romanticists, not something used in newsrooms of the linotype era."

Despite the acknowledgment of lede by Safire and others, and its subsequent use by journalists and non-journalists alike, phrases employing the traditional spelling of lead still find their way into print..."

and as Choire Sicha points out:

"You schmucks who use ridiculous journo-terms make me crazy! Finally, someone is willing to speak out against the use of “lede” in public. Because, ha ha, sucka, there’s no reason for it!"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/bury-the-lede-versus-lead

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago
[-] LaFinlandia@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 months ago
[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Ex-X exec" sounds like part of one of Princess Carolyn's tongue twisters.

Edit: Ex-X tech exec Tex Sexton wrecks his checks protecting sex offense

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Represented by Bob Loblaw Attorney at Law.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I'm looking forward to reading the post about this on Bob Loblaw's Law Blog.

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

xXtwitterXx

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The description of the first utube video is priceless ...

During an Australian government hearing on August 9, 2023 Twitter executive Nick Pickles explains why sharing child sexual abuse material isn't an automatic ban from the platform. Then an Australian senator explains why that's idiotic.

And then there's this ...

But X really does seem to be in a class of its own. The site has increasingly become a haven for right-wing extremists and a safe space for Musk as he descends further into the worship of guys like Donald Trump. Musk’s version of X may be losing tremendous amounts of money, but it exists as a very enjoyable online clubhouse where everyone tells him just how smart and savvy he is. And that goes a long way for any insecure billionaire with more money than sense.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

IIRC the CSAM that was shared was from a notorious case that took place in Australia and/or the crime(s) were committed by Australian citizen(s).

The whole story was covered by 60 Minutes Australia, and is on YT…or was around the time that the Twitter thing happened, but had aired before then because it has such a reputation and Australia was so invested.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Looks like he is being asked to lie again and given how it went the last time, he doesn't want to do it.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
191 points (99.0% liked)

News

23263 readers
2348 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS