125
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by GaveUp@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

So that if there's a big event like a Taylor Swift concert you couldn't go to and they detected you're most likely a fan, they'll gen AI a photo of you at the concert

If you missed a Christmas gathering with your family, they'll gen AI one for you

If like Japan but haven't been there yet, they gen AI a whole vacation album of you there

They're literally trying to embed fabricated events into your life and brain lmao

People are largely very excited for this idea. All the apps between different companies constantly copy each other to achieve feature parity, there's no escape. You will live a life of luxury and excitement whether you want to or not

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cammy@hexbear.net 75 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The commercials where they show a parent editing their child's beach picture or whatever are so bleak.

It's not a picture for them to look back on or to share with the kid when they're older. It's for social media. It starts as a perfectly nice photo and like an intrusive thought asks "what if you could make it better. "

I would hate to have the only parts of my past edited with things that weren't there so my parents could impress the neighbors.

The commercial if you're curious:

https://www.yewtu.be/watch?v=BnJVvzyazqg

[-] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

STEM lords:

soypoint-1 purge-1 purge-2 soypoint-2 Gommunism authoritarian totalitarian jorjorwell 1984, look at Stalin memory holing people to gaslight the citizenry!

Also STEM lords:

so-true Epic bacon bazinga! I can alter memories with my artificial intelligencerinos!

[-] Cammy@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago

billionaire-tears what do you mean you want a divorce? You were smiling in all our pictures together!

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

And people applaud this. At the same time you’ll be seeing more articles asking why suicide rates have skyrocketed and that young people feel more alienated than ever.

[-] Cammy@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

Unrealistic standards of beauty and success that you can project from your phone. My fear is that it'll be normalized.

I have family with dementia and memory issues and I can't imagine not being able to have any real pictures to explore memories

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

It's likely to become a sort of (deliberate) arms race where social norms will expect enhanced images and anyone who doesn't use them (or doesn't use sufficiently expensive bazinga editing) will be socially marginalized. joker-amerikkklap

[-] 666@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Internet, phones, computers; all of it. All of it is eventually folded up into a form of social coercion for you to be more of a productive human being. Sure, they serve that purpose; but the direction of that productivity will always remain the same under what we have now.

[-] Cammy@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

You can't even enjoy the beach with your family. You have to sell it on the internet for likes.

[-] 666@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Or better yet, get caught on the background of someone else's bazinga device and have your face plastered somewhere.

[-] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago

It's become more normalized and somehow more offputting than when everyone you know would add heavy gaussian blur to look... idk younger? Prettier? I honestly don't get it because the blurred photos look awful to me.

[-] SeekTheDeletion@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

Hides wrinkles and blemishes and warts and unkempt hairs and things like that

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago

The commercials where they show a parent editing their child's beach picture or whatever are so bleak.

I haven't had to see those yet, but if that's what's being normalized now... this is a new level of bleak bazinga clownishness that I didn't even know was possible. joker-amerikkklap

[-] Cammy@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

A picture is worth 50 words in an LLM prompt.

[-] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

I intentionally bought a polaroid specifically for memories with my daughter that i could have ready nearly instantly. i still use 35mm on occasion, but that takes a bit more time and set up than a toddler can afford.

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

I gotta get a film camera. I got some nice prints of all my good cat pics cause it would really suck to lose them cause whatever device shit the bed. Hard copies of stuff are cool and good. I'd like to find something entirely analogue

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] autism_2@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Death to Meta

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

lol Pixel also has an "Add Me" feature to add people that weren't there to your photos

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=x65VVs-aSUI

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

I don't know, as someone who liked using Photoshop to do silly stuff (back when I had access to Photoshop), the idea of making it easy and practical to do on a phone sounds fun. I just don't want AI to do it to photos I didn't ask to edit. Stay tf out of my stuff

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago

As with most things AI: Who the fuck would want that?

[-] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago

Chip manufacturers and cloud services providers lol

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

Tbh I can easily see a world where this feature gets positive user metrics because of Instagram brained dweebs sharing these photos to make their lives look more exciting

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

That's like photoshopping yourself with your crush in a photo. Sure a lot of people do it but like, no.

[-] Hohsia@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

People in CS-related fields who want to look like they can code but can’t

[-] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago

This will trigger massive outrage when people's dead kids, parents, pets, etc suddenly appear in photos because the algorithm can't tell if someone is living or dead.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This already happens sometimes for highlight reels but they're actually pretty good at predicting when somebody has left your life whether a breakup, death, or friendship ruined

Also the general public/user base does not care at all if it doesn't happen to them personally lol

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

Mine is super racist and thinks any Asian man in any of my photos is my girlfriend's dad. It's actually hilariously racist

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

That's fucked up and also probably a great couple in-joke

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

Kirk VanHouten: my photos are stored on a cloud? Are yours?

Homer: My photos are stored on a big hard drive with my movies

[-] asante@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

only use for AI i know is searching for specific features in photos/videos, like immich. searching "castle" for all media with castles in them is pretty convenient

screw gen AI like this tho

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago

Yep and it uses offline, local models (well, assuming you're the one running the Immich instance)

Immich is amazing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] git@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

You can self-host Ente if you need similar functionality to Google/iCloud Photos.

[-] Inui@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

There's also Immich, which is scheduled to become stable this year, so no more breaking changes with updates. I've been hosting it for the last year and it's still undergoing rapid development, but other than that, it's been great for me.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 month ago

Honestly in the past 6 months or so since I started using it there's been like one or two breaking changes and those were at the start, no breaking changes for many months now.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Never used it but looks cool af. I've sent my resume in before but they're not hiring :(

[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago

I'm trying to self host more and more, thanks for this it looks dope as hell.

I need to suck it up and get myself a dedicated server instead of running everything off my wife's gaming rig lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hohsia@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago
[-] shamrockpreacher5@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago

Wow. Last Thursday-ism swinging in hard

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago
[-] shamrockpreacher5@reddthat.com 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a philosophy built around the idea that you can't prove the universe wasn't built last Thursday. Adding in fake memories could make it harder to reason what our histories are

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

Ah a very relevant philosophy, as important as "the universe is a simulation", "we are the dream of an alien" and other onanistic bangers

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

It's more of a "proof by absurdity" against Young Earth Creationism. There's no way of knowing if the universe was created five seconds ago or if the people around you are real with their own seperate thoughts, so it's better to act as though the universe is not five seconds old and other people are real.

The argument made by YECs is stuff like fossils, evolution, sediment layers, tree rings, etc. are all "false evidence" put there by God to test our faith or by Satan to dissuade people from believing the Bible (depending on who you're talking to). "Last Thursdayism" is a rejection of this, by using the same argument: "Then how do you know God/Satan didn't invent the Bible to convince you the universe wasn't made last Thursday?"

The point is we can only rely on what we can physically experience. Acting as though material evidence is a trick helps no one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gorb@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

What a twisted "feature". Ynow they could be working on device local models that categorise your photos making searching for something much easier but i guess thats too useful to do.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

I don't think any phones are close to powerful enough to do that yet are they? Isn't computer vision really intensive or something

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

ios actually does this, i can search for generic terms like "cat" or "panda" to find exclusively images/videos of those animals, but i can also search for a specific person (if their face is visible in the picture i want to search for) and they're also categorized like that

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] volcel_olive_oil@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

just put some photos of people doing crimes in their albums and convict

[-] TomBombadil@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

With no other research I have no idea if this is true but the very idea sickens me. I think I will actually get off Google photos. It's like the one thing I still use it's so convenient. But I can't I mustn't. Let my hate be pure.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

This post is the research. I am the primary source

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
125 points (98.4% liked)

technology

23236 readers
103 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS