[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

Imagine if a hardcore anti-Trump deep state lanyard nerd terrified of getting fired by Trump and replaced by a steaming bag of Pizza Ranch gravy finds the heart attack gun and takes care of the "Biden problem" on their own

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

Knowing that I'm supposed to be pronouncing "dirt owl" in an Australian accent has completely changed my outlook on life

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago

Too bad leftist organizers of any stripe are also definitely on his list of people to prosecute, otherwise I'd actually be looking forward to this

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago

At this point the libs are locked in by their own rules. They put Biden in the cockpit, shamed anyone who said "hey don't put that old man in the cockpit", and now they're desperately banging on the door as he drives everyone into a mountain. Libs aren't going to do a CIA style coup, and only Biden can make the decision to drop out at this point. We're on rails

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago

Don't underestimate them, there are plenty of competent fascists out there. Or at least, they aren't more incompetent than the average liberal dork

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah at best, having Democrats in place just slows the rate of fascist decay. It's not actually improving anything

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago

That's the sliver of vote that lives within me. From a Marxist perspective, is a state full of Democrat lanyards better than a state full of rabidly anti-worker chud lanyards, so that labor can organize with fewer legal barriers? Or would unmasking the state as an explicitly bourgeois institution help radicalize the working class and heighten the contradictions? Is there necessarily a "better" option relating to the ideological composition of the state, or is it irrelevant because of the fundamental bourgeois nature of the state regardless of who the lanyards are?

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 10 points 6 days ago

Then George Soros sends us all a big juicy check.

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 136 points 2 months ago

The average person is conflict avoidant and terrible at negotiating. In general life, this is even a virtue. But it's bad for revolutions. Get more comfortable being stubborn, people

32

Reply here to find out

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 73 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
16
Is libgen working (hexbear.net)
submitted 6 months ago by HamManBad@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

I've tried all of the URLs I know and I can't find a way to reach library Genesis. Is there a known problem?

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 80 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For context, tens of millions of people being wiped out by famine was something that happened every couple of decades in China. What makes the famine under Mao notable was that it was the last famine China ever had, thanks in large part to the comprehensive revolution mentioned above, which allowed the state to pursue long term policies that benefitted the whole society instead of the wealthy class

0

Img: the Unabomber manifesto

Seriously, how can someone who spent their whole life in the wilderness need to touch grass so hard? You feel alienated by wage labor and capitalist development and your solution is to complain about feminists and Berkeley professors? What a useless crybaby.

view more: next ›

HamManBad

joined 4 years ago