this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
518 points (94.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s official: Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert (R) is scared. Recent polling has shown Democratic frontrunner Adam Frisch in the lead in Boebert’s district, and now the anti-LGBTQ+ Congresswoman is pleading with voters for help.

According to the Aspen Daily News, Boebert’s campaign sent three successive emails at the end of August that acknowledged the possibility of Boebert’s defeat.

The emails were reacting to the results of a Keating Research poll that showed Frish beating Boebert in the 2024 election to represent Colorado’s Third Congressional District.

The poll showed that 50% of likely voters in the district say they will vote for Frisch, who almost beat Boebert in 2022 in the purple district, and only 48% say they’re voting for Boebert. Frisch holds a bigger advantage – 17 points – when it comes to unaffiliated voters, the group that the Frisch campaign has said it’s trying to appeal to in this election cycle. He also has a 32-point advantage with Latin voters.

A majority – 53% – of likely voters in the survey had an unfavorable view of Boebert, and only 42% had a favorable view of her. 34% had a favorable view of Frisch, while 26% viewed him unfavorably.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 202 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Pretty dramatic headline for a 50/50 poll and a fundraising email.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 96 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have an old phone number that used to be owned by a conservative I know. I have been getting these over the top "IT'S ALL OVER AND YOU HAVEN'T HELPED, 5X MATCH NOW!!!!" texts pretty much every day of every election cycle for years now.

Telling followers that the world is ending unless you ~~give them your money~~ donate to the campaign seems to be just the way they fundraise these days.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, I get emails from Nancy Pelosi literally every day about Trump and asking for donations. I'm not sure why I haven't unsubscribed....that shit is annoying.

[–] st3ph3n@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you'll just get subscribed to other campaigns all the time anyway because those motherfuckers share/sell your information to each other.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Never give ANY politician your email if you don't want a flood of emails asking for donations.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 73 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Jesus Fucking Christ on a goddamned pogo stick, how can anyone have a favorable view of Boebert?

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They. don't. care. There's a (R) next to her name, she hates "woke" people (wink wink) and abortion, she loves Trump and gun proliferation. That's literally all that matters.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's an (R) next to her name, she's very attractive, and boy does she love her gunz.

That's enough for 95% of Republicans.

[–] books@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

She's got that weak chin game on lock.

She's a fucking train wreck.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I drive through her district once a year to get the best peaches in the world and it’s always so confounding to see all the “Boebert Country” signs and stickers. It really is weird. Far from being embarrassed, these people actually like her. If it weren’t for Pitkin County, she’d win in a walk.

[–] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well she does have that fancy schmancy R next to her name. I'm a simple man, some may confuse my level of brain activity with that of a dead man, but when I vote that's usually all I pay attention to

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

36-year-old GILFs in your area!

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was going to say I was thankful she wasn't actually in my area, then I remembered who my representative is and honestly don't know if she's worse than Gym Jordan or not

[–] st3ph3n@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

He's more dangerous, being evil and not as fucking stupid.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait…. She’s. Grandma already? Awkward.

[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And her mom is a great grandma at the age of 56

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

42% favorable.

Why? Wtf is wrong with people?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Good. Let the bitch sink. If she also wastes donors money in the process, the better. Any cent wasted for her election fund is a cent that cannot be spent on Trumps lawyers.

[–] Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dumb hate-obsessed freak. The sooner she vanishes permanently from the public eye the better.

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

She's going to be a commentator on one of the shitty outrage porn "news" channels after her political career ends a'la Palin

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Came to say this. She's a brand now, like Palin. My hope is that once she leaves office she'll suck donations from the regular GOP and keep it in her own hands.

[–] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Woman who does nothing and gets paid is worried she will soon do nothing and not get paid

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slinkyninja@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

They always turn to the ‘true believers’ once the excitement and funding dwindles away.

[–] Wilibus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If she is really that hard up for cash why doesn't she just go back to being a prostitute?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

What about your own bootstraps honey?

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The thing that i find most fascinating about american politics is that they galavant around the country or their district and people take the time out of their life to go see them and give them money.
But i guess if you don't find megachurches bizarre, this is normal too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zerkrazus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I hope she does lose. I'd really like her to get wrecked, but unlikely considering how red a large portion of her district is from what I've heard/read. the sooner she fucks off to obscurity, the better.

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

There are a couple of Republicans running against her in the primary, and they're far more qualified. Still assholes, but they seem to be able to read, so they're miles ahead of her. I wouldn't be surprised at all if she loses to one of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah pretty much standard copy for all political campaigns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] viperex@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just like Lindsey Graham, she'll probably squeeze out another victory in her next election much to liberals' surprise

[–] EonNShadow@pawb.social 9 points 1 year ago

She was the closest race in the entire midterm.

Please, CO-3, get out and vote, for our collective sanity

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see what happens to her. She's at that age where mental health disease really starts to manifest into dysfunction.

[–] gonzo0815@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't that already happen?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It already happened in 48% of the voters, it's a statewide emergency.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Sucks to be her I guess

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago
[–] JazzAlien@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Na na naaaah nah, na na naaaaaah nah, hey hey heeeyyy, goooodbyeeee

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sometimes I remember the family guy sketch of jerry falwell and pat Robertson after the https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bEvjkDpEtKk The sentiment seems to apply to so many republican "angst" moments. "Why am I losing this campaign? I hated all the right things." At least it is how I imagine that they think about these things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[–] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is just a normal routine fundraising.

[–] socialjeffwarrior@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Oh no, anyway.

load more comments
view more: next ›