506
They want to ban pornography, then claim that same-sex couples showing affection to each other publicly is pornography.
And that trans people simply existing are pornography.
And give the death penalty to sex offenders, and classify pornography as a sex offense. See where this is going?
The death penalty is porn for conservatives.
What will they do then?
"It's alright when I do it" is a core pillar of conservative ideology, so it's fine.
load more comments
(1 replies)
If there's one positive to take from it, I think it's quite the compliment to be considered porn walking.
Licks fingers to nips Tssss!
Now if only it weren't from that greaay cohort...
To be fair, most of the book bans going on in Burgerland right now are justified exactly this way: they're "pornographic" because there's gay people.
And video rental?
Btw this is why they call everything a slippery slope. Because that's what they want to do.
There is still physical video rental outside of libraries? Even netflix shut down dvd-by-mail
And Redbox is going under.
Going? I thought they shut down operations last month?
Maybe they did? I thought I still saw a machine by the grocery store the other day.
I wouldn't be surprised if they just abandoned the kiosks.
Dibs
Toe-ing a fine line between larceny and litter cleanup to get there first.
It’s a legitimate salvage.
Rent a white van, put on a coverall and nobody will even think twice about you taking it.
Actually you probably don’t need the coverall. Just some contractory looking clothes.
High vis vest makes you invisible.
This is exactly it. I see one every time I go to Walmart with a piece of paper over the screen/controls saying it is no longer in operation
This might bring it back! Playboy's next.
I look forward to porn winning the War on Porn like drugs won the War on Drugs.
There will be a lot of similarities, like how with drugs you never know what's laced with fentanyl. You'll never know what conditions your illegal porn is made in. After all, it's already illegal.
"Three local law enforcement officers were hospitalized today when, during a routine traffic stop, a hidden Hustler magazine fell open in front of them..."
load more comments
(2 replies)
ach! danged sex workers! with their, their, their human anatomy!
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's really amazing sometimes that so much legal and political policy is driven by men who are ashamed of their boners.
It's kind of sad
Thank you, Puritans.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I just want to make sure I'm understanding this.
He just admitted that his goal is to quietly litigate porn into non-existence by passing age verification laws on one end, then flood the courts with frivolous lawsuits with all sorts of human rights allegations in order to bankrupt what's left. And from there, use the same strategy to effectively litigate anything else they don't like out of existence, while also not making it a campaign issue or even all that well known publicly because he knows that these positions are hugely unpopular and would cost elections, because fuck you that's why?
He does seem to jump on the Trump method of handling things. Either get what you want legitimately or litigate your opponent into bankruptcy until they don't have the resources to fight any more. But I'm sure he also heard the call to arms from Clarence Thomas saying that the Supreme Court has their back, so he probably figures if his ilk are going to seize power through the courts because they know they can't win elections, there's no better time to do it than now.
Don't forget, these are the same people who think trans people's mere existence is pornography.
That's because all of their porns are exclusively trans.
SCOTUS' Uncle Ruckus ain't gon' like that
God save Long Dong Silver🙏!
“Who needs porn? Just call Jeffery and he’ll get you a girl to jerk you off with a glove on”
I swear, I think these chucklefucks honestly think that litigating porn out of existence has even the slightest chance of working at all.
Less reputable sites are typically foreign sites, out of the reach of US government, and can continue to just ignore US law enforcement. And even if the US does start investigating them, these sites can pick up and set up shop somewhere else literally overnight. Project 2025's ideas would have zero effect on them.
And regarding the larger sites like Pornhub? Do they think they're just gonna say "Aw, shucks. We cant show people titties any more." Fucking lol. They'll just set up shop overseas, block all US IP addresses, and just conveniently have advertisements for various VPNs on their home page.
Pornhub and the like will continue distributing all the porn. They will continue to make all the money distributing all the porn. Heck, they'll probably make even more all the money hosting advertisements for and partnering with VPN services. And people will continue to watch all the porn. Even if Project 2025 got their way, the great Overseas Porn Migration of 2025 will be merely a moment in time of porn's history. In fact, there will be porn of it.
Yep, they should look at Tumblr as an example. When they banned porn in 2018, they lost a third of their users, the automatic censorship tools were flagging all sorts of non-porn stuff and they reversed the ban four years later.
Wait what? Tumblr has porn again?
I could see a ton of ads like. xYZ VPN sponsored by (pornhubs parent company).
Seeing stuff like this makes me wish Sega was still in the hardware business.
First they came for the communists...
Fucking puritan ass motherfuckers need to fuck off. This is no different than prohibition. It's stupid and they're stupid.
I don't think that will work.
Some of this felt like they think they can get away with it, but now I'm starting to notice that they didn't exactly account for reality anywhere.
But, I like porn.
“They can take a woman’s right to her own body . . . But they’ll never take . .
OUR PORN!”
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
506 points (99.4% liked)
politics
19138 readers
3483 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS