this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
177 points (99.4% liked)

News

37132 readers
1597 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

Google is now the only search engine that can surface results from Reddit, making one of the web’s most valuable repositories of user generated content exclusive to the internet’s already dominant search engine.

If you use Bing, DuckDuckGo, Mojeek, Qwant or any other alternative search engine that doesn’t rely on Google’s indexing and search Reddit by using “site:reddit.com,” you will not see any results from the last week. DuckDuckGo is currently turning up seven links when searching Reddit, but provides no data on where the links go or why, instead only saying that “We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us.” Older results will still show up, but these search engines are no longer able to “crawl” Reddit, meaning that Google is the only search engine that will turn up results from Reddit going forward. Searching for Reddit still works on Kagi, an independent, paid search engine that buys part of its search index from Google.

The news shows how Google’s near monopoly on search is now actively hindering other companies’ ability to compete at a time when Google is facing increasing criticism over the quality of its search results. And while neither Reddit or Google responded to a request for comment, it appears that the exclusion of other search engines is the result of a multi-million dollar deal that gives Google the right to scrape Reddit for data to train its AI products.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago

They literally are waiting for a judge to rule on whether or not Alphabet is a monopoly with Google search and now they're doing this.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago (4 children)

"Reddit represents one of the largest data sets of just human beings talking about interesting things," Huffman said. "We are not in the business of giving that away for free."

Steve Huffman is a rent seeking asshole

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The issue is, of course, that people keep giving greedy little pigboy Spez content for free, that he then turns around and sells.

Fuck Spez. Fuck reddit.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Yeah it’s frustrating but I see Reddit getting increasingly worse over time between the platform inserting more advertising everywhere and an increase in astroturfing as Google becomes increasingly dependent. That should hopefully lead to people looking for greener (and hopefully federated) pastures.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

The issue is that the FTC is letting him get away with it.

[–] mst@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's why I replaced all my comments with "fuck u/spez" before deleting them.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago
[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Greedy little pigboy was happy to GET it for free though...

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Morally, he’s a pirate. Metaphorically a tapeworm.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder how he feels about the traffic Reddit gets from Google searches and if they should be giving that for free

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Google paid Reddit sixty million for access to their data right before their IPO

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

That really isn’t all that much for the amount of content they’ll get access to and also considering it’s Alphabet paying that.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Google search is such garbage. I get why they would do this, but it's just more enshittification and I just... don't care. It's like watching old friends doing meth. It's sad, but in a way I just have to distance myself from instead of spending my energy trying to save them from a fate they are determined to meet.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

This is more than a monopoly.

Google is helping enshittify the internet. They are destroying what they helped build for a quick buck.

So they just landgrabbed what they percieve to be one of the last islands of stability (though I'm sure Lemmy users have a thing or two to say about that), so they can keep enshittifying it for a quick buck.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I actually think its worse than that, as it funnels all info from reddit through a Google branded filter first.

What kind of censorship is that bringing to the masses? What kind of propaganda will be pushed even harder now?

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago

I really wonder what the internet will look like in 5 years, not much good stuff will be left at this pace

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't worry, they're no longer able to search reddit but the good stuff is old. Reddit has gone to shit, and this is just another step on its way down.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Reddit needs to be taken to task in a way only the EU seems to be able to even attempt to do to social media companies.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 11 points 2 years ago

This is one of the annoying things about sites like reddit and part of why I don't use it anymore. They claim ownership of any information/human interaction that occurs on there sight. All that stuff should be freely accessible.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I created a ton of content for Reddit as well and it actually made them worth less on their IPO.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is a joke, right? Im so bad at sarcasm when I can't see a shit eating grin laughing at my gullible lol. Or did you really have valuable content on Reddit at the time of their IPO?

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure they're saying they made sure Reddit was full of shitposts and low quality content, thus lowering the value. It's a funny, self-deprecating post (to me).

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

See I thought that was what they're implying but was to curious about the content part not to ask lol. Thanks!

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don’t understand how you prevent a search engine from scraping a public website?

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 2 years ago

You don't prevent it. You add exceptions for their Web crawler in robots.txt and pretty much all the current Web crawlers respect that.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

That's some grade-a bullshit

I'm glad I deleted my posts, then my account.

Fuck that place.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you absolutely need to search reddit with something other than Google, Kagi can do it. But I don't recommend visiting reddit.

[–] palordrolap@kbin.run 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kagi can do it ... for now, I assume. Maybe they'll get to keep the privilege if they decide to throw some of that pay-for search money at Spez, but chances are that's going to get stopped. Or their prices will go up. Again.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From what I recall their in-house solution combines results from a bunch of search engines, including Google. So I think as long as Google can index it, and as long as Kagi works that way and continues to, it shouldn't be affected.

[–] palordrolap@kbin.run 3 points 2 years ago

Ah. Paid-for search aggregation, not paid-for search. I hadn't picked up on that aspect of their model for some reason.