159
submitted 4 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 119 points 4 months ago

"I don’t care what the millionaires think.”

If he made this the tagline for his entire campaign / next term, I'd feel much better about voting for him.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 97 points 4 months ago

That was Bernie's tagline (well, billionaires rather than millionaires) before the DNC came together like Voltron to simultaneously consolidate around Biden and boot him out of the race.

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago

It felt extra bad when even Liz was in on it.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I very much remember Liz was the last hold out on endorsing Biden. I was on her campaign.

Edit to add evidence:

Bernie Endorsed Biden Monday, April 13th 2020

Elizabeth followed 2 days later on Wednesday, April 15th 2020

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago

Fuck her. She had her chance to support a fellow Progressive twice in a row and she chose to help the centrists both times rather than let someone else with the values she claimed to hold win. She's either a liar or so unbelievably bad at strategic thinking that she belongs nowhere near politics.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Liz was splitting the left vote with Bernie, on purpose.

Liz is a traitor.

[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

🐍🐍🐍🐍

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Why did she run in 2020 though? Why didn't she run in 2016 when Bernie and many of her supporters, myself included at the time, overwhelming supported her and begged her to run against Clinton (because we knew she was a terrible candidate that would cost us so much).

Why did she choose to run against Bernie when the policies they support are so similar.

Better question: what policies did she support that she didn't think Bernie would enact that made her feel she needed to run against him? It was obvious he had a better chance than her that point, so why run against him?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Last I heard he was listening to his family, all of which happen to be millionaires, including himself.

He's just another arrogant, out of touch, privileged elite with no understanding of what the majority of Americans experience day to day.

His hubris was on full display in Friday's interview, the stakes are clearly not the same for him. He has enough wealth and power to weather this fascist storm, unfortunately most of us do not.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

See, he didn't say it before but only says it now, because now it's PERSONAL. And did he really use the word "millionaires" instead of "billionaires?" If yes, he's a goddam coward, and I thank him for letting me know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 73 points 4 months ago

Fuck you for trying to spin it that way, Biden.

I don’t want you as the candidate because the shit you’re saying indicates you straight up don’t understand the stakes. You said that you’d “feel fine, because you gave it your all”. Meanwhile, I’ll be out here dodging fucking 3%er and Proud Boy paramilitary squads that Trump will surely deputize with an “official act”, which will be very legal and very cool as per the Tribunal of Six’s recent decision.

Your head is not in the game. You are stuck not only in the sunk-cost fallacy, but also up your own ass. You are not trying hard enough. You are not using the right tactics. At this point I seriously doubt you even understand what the right tactics are.

We are trying to fight against fascism, and you’re going to fucking hand it to the fascists. Get out of our fucking way.

[-] chryan@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

I've read a number of comments like yours and have always been curious about this sentiment.

I feel similarly iffy about the whole process. Despite that, I can't think of a viable alternative at this point in time that wouldn't lead to a disastrous result.

I genuinely want to know: if he does step down and give way to another candidate, who do you have in mind? Is it one person? Is it multiple? Or are we just hoping that if he steps down, a magical better candidate will show up?

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 months ago

Harris, Newsom, and Whitmer would probably be my top 3 picks for viability. Of those three, I think Whitmer would be my favorite choice, but I think Newsom would be the most pragmatic choice (and to be clear, there is a LOT I don’t like about Newsom, despite the fact that I align with him on a decent number of issues) in the context of electability (white, male, a touch religious but not overly so, charismatic, great public speaker). I think Harris is uninspiring and the wrong choice for a TON of reasons, but the establishment will probably stick with her if they are somehow forced to not go with Biden simply because she’s currently VP.

But, you know, that’s what primaries are supposed to be. We’re not really supposed to have the DNC essentially just playing kingmaker and doing cloak and dagger shit behind the scenes so their Chosen One ends up guaranteed to clinch the nomination. Unfortunately, the DNC is basically run by corporatist neoliberals at this point, so they aren’t interested in doing that… and they’re also unwilling to admit that such attitudes are precisely how we got here in the first fucking place.

We got Trump because “it was her turn”. And I will NEVER fucking forgive Hillary for that. It’s abundantly clear that the “adults in the room” at the DNC have no fucking idea what they’re doing.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Yeah, the best case scenario was Biden not running for 2024 from the beginning so we could have proper primaries, and align behind the winner. That's how it should have been handled.

But it's too late. None of the candidates you mentioned are strong enough to rally behind this late in the race. Each state would need to figure out a makeshift primary and then align, or DNC would have to choose, which would make it Harris by default. It would be an absolute disaster.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean… you and I can armchair general the situation until we’re blue in the face, but the fact remains that the debate and his subsequent interview last Friday (that was supposed to allay concerns, but ended up stoking them - albeit, for me at least, in a different direction) have made not only random joes like me lose confidence in his ability to pull out a win in November, but sitting legislators, party insiders, and the donor class as well. Biden and his campaign are handling this whole thing like rank amateurs and imbeciles, and I'm furious about it because I understand exactly what the implications are if we fail to stop the fascists from winning the election… and neither Biden nor his campaign seem to be taking that as seriously as it needs to be taken.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

But did he slam them, too?

[-] xerazal@lemmy.zip 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yea I'm so elite. That's why I barely survive paycheck to paycheck, don't have healthcare, don't have much with regards to retirement funds, and have to ration my food. And I'm fucking 33.

Fuck you, you elitist old man. Democratic elite are showing their true colors, that they don't give a fuck about us. We are trying to tell him that he's going to lose to a fascist with his shitty debate performance, and he's pretending it didn't happen and trying to gaslight us. It's not that we want trump because we don't. But we are worried that his shit performance will depress the vote into not voting, which is a very real threat and will lead to fascism.

If we fall into fascism it won't be the voters fault, it'll be the fault of the elite ruling class. We didn't have to go in this direction, but we have been going here because Republicans keep going further authoritarian and the Democratic party barely tries to push back.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Whoaaaa....

Are you saying voters aren't going to respond well to Biden telling them their concerns aren't valid and no matter what he's not listen to them?!

[-] xerazal@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

It's just such a tone deaf response. I sent an email to my senators and rep asking them to listen to their constituencies regarding their election fears. Not that I think it will do much. But God, waiting around for this old man to lose to Trump while feeling powerless (yes, I'll still vote) just sucks so much.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Old Joe's got everybody mad at him. Elites. Big money donors. Etc. Everybody it seems bur Democratic voters. Polls are the same as before the debate.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Because those votes are mainly votes against Trump and even a trash can would probably pull in similar protest votes. All the more reason the idea of a better candidate that people are even slightly more enthusiastic over could push those numbers up

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Yep. I'm voting against Trump, not for Biden. Trump could run against a rock for all I care.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Therein lies the rub. There aren't any democrats that poll better.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

No other democrat is campaigning though...

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

True. However, national exposure is a large factor and even if there was someone vetted, they still will walk unintroduced on the national stage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

You realize the Venn diagram of "Candidates the DNC financiers support" and "Candidates that would get more support than Joe Biden" doesn't actually overlap, right?

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

If campaign financing is the primary consideration then we deserve the shit storm that's coming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yeah.

The vast majority willing to vote for Biden, would vote "blue no matter who".

Which means logically, switching candidates is the smartest plan if all that matters is stopping trump.

But a very small, very vocal group of Biden voters (and even Biden) seem to be lying about what's most important. I still can't believe Biden really said he wouldn't care if he lost.

If they can't get Biden. A Republican is their second pick.

They just won't admit it.

But it's the only logical reason people would be insisting it has to be Biden. Just like Joe, they don't care if trump wins.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] kbal@fedia.io 10 points 4 months ago

Polls were not good before the debate. Maybe it's too early to say what the effect will be but here's the second report I've seen saying it's getting worse.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 4 months ago

Old Joe's got everybody mad at him. Elites. Big money donors. Etc.

To be fair, having those particular groups mad at you should be considered a good thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

What are you talking about, before the debate he was even now he's down by 2 points and his approval rating is hitting new lows. For context he was up by 8 points this time last cycle to win a close election in November. Joe is falling behind and people don't like him, ignoring people's dislike for a candidate is how we lost 2016.

[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

The polls are worse, by a lot. He is absolutely sinking and not coming back.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/03/us/politics/poll-debate-biden-trump.html

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 4 months ago

Funny how I’m suddenly one of the elites. I guess my opinion doesn’t reach him, so his definition probably stands.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago

The problem is that plenty of non-elites also want him to exit the race; they just don't have the option of urging him to do it.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

LOL, the term "elite/elitism" has lost all meaning.

[-] caveman8000@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Look at me, I'm an Elite! All this time I thought I was just some broke ass white boy.

[-] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Clearly he's got aides helping him do most stuff. That's not unheard of for any political official, but I imagine he's just going along with it like Reagan at the end of his term.

When he's by himself on a debate podium, you can see he's not doing great.

However, Trump is worse. They're two old men and you can see Biden is a calm older man slowly slipping. Trump is mad at everyone and everything, refuses help, and requires everyone to be a sycophant around him to placate his ego. The only way people get what they want out of him is to steer the bull in the direction of the China shop they want destroyed. He's an old man yelling at the TV, and we all have to hear him.

That said, one of them can, will, and has done more damage than the other. That's why I'd vote for Biden. The meme of "live Biden > dead Biden > dead Trump > live Trump" comes to mind.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Ah, yes, the elites, like -checks notes- 75% of the country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] noxy@yiffit.net 4 points 4 months ago

I don't care if he's comatose and braindead by election day, I'm still voting for him if he's on the ballot.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
159 points (89.6% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4410 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS