this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
391 points (98.3% liked)

politics

29497 readers
2054 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Supreme Court's immunity decision has reportedly emboldened the presumptive GOP nominee to pursue his far-right agenda and authoritarian aims "without fear of punishment or restraint."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 136 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"without fear of punishment or restraint."

This is what happens when you normalize a fucking Fascist instead of taking him down when you motherfuckers had the chance.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hope he’s ready for the fate of kings. Actually, i take that back. I don’t give a shit what that bloated rapist felon demented sociopath is ready for. His 15 minutes were up in the 80s. Obviously no one in an official capacity is able to take care of fucking business.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

If he does become a true dictator, I wouldn't be surprised by him dying of old age. The fascist he hands his power down to however, they might see the fate of kings.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 76 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Keep this in mind when you see the bots urging you not to vote against him here on lemmy. Maybe call them out for trying to destroy democracy.

And vote like lives depend on it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Voting is the beginning of acting to defend yourself from tyranny, not the end.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Absolutely, especially those idiotic accounts like respectology and givesomefucks that try and play the “I’m not voting for Biden” but Trump is also a terrible choice angle. Both Side noise for sure (or they truly are that naive and foolish).

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I think Givesomefucks might be somewhat legit. But the other one… yeah. I can’t agree more.

[–] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm pretty new to Lemmy and was really hoping this wouldn't be the same level of problem as it is everywhere else. Oh what a sweet summer child I am, apparently.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 55 points 2 years ago

"Ready to"? He's already been planning to regardless of that SC ruling.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Can we please be done with the term “the quiet part”?

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

kibiz0r SLAMMED "the quiet part"

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

Hasn't been actually quiet in a long, long time.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

And dog whistle!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

This is a feature for the cons. If someone thinks they can be shamed out of it, they are delusional or just extremely low-info.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If there's any good in recent events it's that Trump may be more frequently saying this quiet part out loud - thereby changing the vote of a few that otherwise weren't paying attention.

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He flat out said he was going to be a dictator. . It’s not like people weren’t listening they either don’t care or think they will be spared as long as they own the libs.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He did. And the low-level supporters i know who vote republiQan in their sleep don’t “believe” it means anything. It’s beyond me. I’m so fucking horrified we’re doing this AGAIN. For fuck’s sake.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s not that they doing believe it. They want it. A sizable part of the US (and any country tbh) would prefer that there was a single person with all the authority

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They want daddy to take care of them.

Effective Democracy requires an informed populace to make hard decisions (vote) about difficult and nuanced situations.

Dictators tell everyone the problem is easy to fix and that they will fix it. Usually they find a scapegoat to blame.

They are people who are frustrated by the complexity of real life and want someone to take care of everything for them.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, I figured most of them want a dictator because they believe the leopards won't eat their faces.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only many of them. The rest are confusedly marching along and seig heiling.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

If they're capable of not wanting a dictator, even if he's on their "team," there's some hope, though once he's in power it will be too late to do anything about it.

[–] Happywop@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So if this dystopian scenario actually comes to pass...I wouldn't be surprised if it was open season on SCOTUS judges and their ilk...you want 2A motherfcukers? they seem to forget THEY are the MINORITY

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Which justices do you think get gone?

I don't think it's the corrupt ones. He can do whatever, he can pardon. And now when he says do "x" it Is a Constitutional order.

Even if it's not.

I don't really think it's 'the quiet part' anymore if it's been explicitly legalized. At this point its just 'the part' because the consolidated power is already here right now.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

And his dumbfuck followers would murder people to ensure it happens!

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If we're for real getting a dictator, let's at least be smart about it. Don't give it to the conman or the insane Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society christofascists. What's Gen. Mattis doing these days? He'd make an excellent dictator.

load more comments
view more: next ›