80
submitted 5 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 81 points 5 months ago

If losing this war would be catastrophic, why did you start it???

peppino-why

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 57 points 5 months ago

It's seriously hilarious to see them saying "a lot ofnpeople say we should concede but that would be bad for ukraine"

Hey dummy, what other option do you have. It's a child's argument. Losing would be bad and we dont like bad so we're not going to lose.

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 43 points 5 months ago

“Our only option is to double down and make losing even more catastrophic.”

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 39 points 5 months ago

The RAND Corporation study that was used as the template for America's war in Ukraine specifically outlines the scenario where Russia reindustralises and wins. The conclusion is: this is unlikely, but would be catastrophic.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 23 points 5 months ago

Working for war think tanks has to be so fun. You get to play board games and call it productive work, get paid $100k to role play, and then the DM turns in a report of the game to the president

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 1 points 5 months ago

You ever read a job description and think "wow, kinda wish I was a total piece of shit now"

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 19 points 5 months ago

I remember this study but I'm having trouble finding it, any chance you have a link?

[-] GinAndJuche@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

Seconding the request for any help finding it.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
80 points (100.0% liked)

news

23529 readers
696 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS