We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Krakkkers: "Oh great two Hitlers"

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago

The true gender binary

[–] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In any good system, there is more than two choices.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You can’t vote third-Hitler! If you don’t vote for regular Hitler then worse Hitler will win!

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm losing track of all the Hitlers smh

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago

There's 101% Hitler, Normal Hitler, Mecha Hitler, and Hitler Jr

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago

God, I hated my class on Hitler Particle physics. I don't care about how Hitler Quark Jets result from Strong Hitler interactions. Just annihilate them all with anti-Hitlers and be done with it.

[–] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 20 points 8 months ago

102% Hitler runs a spoiler campaign against 100% Hitler so that 101% Hitler wins. 100% Hitler blames 99% Hitler anyway.