Oh, my. Hohoohohooooooyhooasfoohooasfoi;jmsdkl;fmn iwaek ln sdaf oh shit.as.d fasdf'ojka;sdmkaf kjasdfiiidiiiiiiiiiiii oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooasd

[–] itappearsthat@hexbear.net 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I have never read a harder cope sentence than "sharp concurrence". Like we make fun of these people for fetishizing losing and dissent, now they fetishize agreeing? What the actual fuck lmao?

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I like etymology and looking things up. But I don't think I even did a quickie google of the judge/justice use of "concurrence" because legal shit can be so tedious.

---

Nina edit

TIL - there's something even more lib than a "withering dissent". A "sharp concurrence" is the most lib thing possible. I thought a concurring opinion might be complicated. Nope. It's very simple.

Concurring opinion

In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for their decision.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"A sternly unpleasant glare" dennis-stare

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sotomayor Raised an Eyebrow after EVERY Ruling by Supercilious plays.

---

supercilious [] Etymology: early 1500s from Latin superciliosus "haughty", from supercilium "eyebrow".

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago

But they agreed dissidently!

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

RIP in peace old friend

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I better become a malevolent ghost so I can haunt Israel or there will be hell to pay!

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Anyone know any good necromantic rituals?

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

juche-rose how do we not have any juche necromancy emojis with all the fucking memeing we do about it

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago

Sometimes we must be the change we want to see in the world

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I was honestly gonna guess 7-2 or something like that, with the dissenters arguing about how being impeached should impact legal ability to run again or something similar and technical, but without real standing

Liberals continue to be more pathetic than expected

[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

ain't that the dems in a nutshell. "you're doing exactly what we would do, but too much and too loud!"

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The rollin' coal Trump Train leads to fascism.

The Trump Train with the lib caboose also leads to fascism. But it's important to recognize that it's a diesel and it goes slower. Also the libs want Americans to know they are working as hard as they are able are to get permission to paint a rainbow flag on their train car.

[–] wopazoo@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm pretty sure diesel trains are faster than coal trains. After all, Hitler didn't actually win any elections; he was appointed by Paul von Hindenburg.

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Sharp concurrence" lol

Cannot write a more succinct and damning summary of democrats and libs in general

[–] edge@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

I didn't know "scathing dissent" had an even worse sibling.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

I entirely forgot about concurrences. I have a TIL comment lower in this thread - https://hexbear.net/comment/4663388