516
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Minnesota’s new state flag should feature an eight-pointed North Star against a dark blue background shaped like the state, with a solid light blue field at the right, a special commission decided Tuesday as it picked a replacement for an older design that many Native Americans considered offensive.

The State Emblems Redesign Commission chose the final version on an 11-1 vote after finalizing a new state seal that depicts a loon, the state bird. Unless the Legislature rejects them, the new flag and seal will automatically become official April 1, 2024, when Minnesota observes Statehood Day.

The star echoes Minnesota’s state motto of “Star of the North.” The commission’s chairman, Luis Fitch, said that to him, the light blue represents the Mississippi River, “the most important river in the United States,” pointing to the North Star. But he acknowledged it could mean other things to other people. Symmetry and simplicity won out over other versions, including ones that included a green stripe for the state’s agricultural heritage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago
[-] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

How is that racist? Native americans are a big part of the state's history

[-] wieson@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

It's a depiction (celebratory?) of them being purposely driven away from the land. The Native American is fleeing.

[-] aulin@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Wow. I saw it as the two people sharing the land. I did not see it as fleeing. Still a terrible flag, and even more so if it can be interpreted so differently.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I saw it as the two people sharing the land.

Honestly? Even if it was unequivocally that it would still be a problem. The whitewashing of using violence to drive people from their homes and then pretending that they came to an agreement to share the land is just gross.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

What if i see the indian circiling in for the kill?

[-] S_204@lemm.ee -5 points 6 months ago

Are we still using that word or did we figure that part out already?

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

i went to elementry school on a reservation, indian reservation was the parlance of the time. Kinda stuck with me.

[-] S_204@lemm.ee -4 points 6 months ago

Maybe time to leave that in your past. Around these parts that's not a word folks are fond of.

[-] MonkRome@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I don't know where "around these parts" is for you but I've heard plenty of people refer to themselves as indian or American Indian instead of Native American in my lifetime. Really many people would prefer you use their actual tribe name over either one, but it's most often white people getting bent out of shape over using "indian" in my experience.

[-] S_204@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

These parts are the highest indigenous population per capita in Canada and the home of the Metis nation. Maybe we're just less shitty than some other places but that's a nice thing to learn!

[-] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Or actual Indians, from India.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Many Native American people prefer the term "American Indians", to be fair. There is a bit of a split on which one is preferrable depending on who you ask. It varies from tribe to tribe, region to region, and with age differences.

Most Native people would just prefer to be called by their tribal affiliation over either of the terms, but accept them as our collective terms for them. Many don't care which one you use because it's wrong either way, really.

This is just from my experience talking with some people from different tribes in my area, and from seeing the question posted on forums before.

[-] aulin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That's true. But I was thinking the motif might be from before all that.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

There really isn't any "before all that" though. Especially that far west. Along the east coast there might have been a generation of "we just want to escape weligious pewsecution and gwow cown uwu 👉👈🥺" but the first permanent settlement in Minnesota was in 1852, 7 years after the phrase "manifest destiny" was coined. Minnesota was established during the era where the prevailing belief of white Americans was that God commanded them to take all of America for themselves and anyone who tried to stop them was to be destroyed.

[-] aulin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh, shit. I don't have that detailed knowledge of US history. 1852. That's almost 100 years after its founding, right? I had no clue it took that long to spread west.

[-] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Just two friends hanging out with their spear and their rifle respectively at hand

[-] aulin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The rifle is just chilling. The dude's plowing.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
516 points (98.0% liked)

News

21695 readers
2951 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS