this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
65 points (98.5% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14428 readers
470 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Machu Picchu is an Inca settlement located in the High Andes of Peru in the Urubamba Valley, north of Cuzco. The site, perched high above the Urubamba river, has been variously described as a fortress, imperial retreat and ceremonial precinct. It was founded by Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui in c. 1450 CE, had capacity for around 1,000 residents at its peak, and ranked amongst the most sacred of all sites for the Inca. Following the collapse of the Inca empire, Machu Picchu was abandoned and forgotten, only to be rediscovered in 1911 CE by the explorer Hiram Bingham. Machu Picchu is listed by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site.

Purpose

Machu Picchu (meaning 'old hill') was an imperial estate founded by and belonging to Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui, the Inca ruler, in the mid-15th century CE. The ownership of the site was later passed to Pachacuti's successors. On its rediscovery by the explorer Hiram Bingham in 1911 CE (although local residents in the valley had always known of the site's existence) it was claimed as the last capital of the Incas. However, this proved to be untrue when the actual final capital was discovered at Vilcabamba, further downstream in the Urubamba Valley.

Another hypothesis concerning the site posed by early historians was that Machu Picchu was a fortress and the strong walls, large towers, and dry moats were cited in support of this theory. The need for fortification perhaps sprang from a series of severe droughts which made the competition for resources fierce. This would also explain why the site was not occupied for very long as when the water situation improved the necessity for such citadel sites declined.

Once again though, further study has revealed that most of the architecture was designed for religious purposes and the fortifications may well have been put in place to ensure only a select few could enter this sacred site. In further support of this interpretation, a road was discovered which linked the site to several residential settlements dotted along the valley. The most likely purpose of Machu Picchu, then, was as a sacred site, probably to the sun god Inti and with the additional purpose of reminding the recently conquered local population of the power and might of Pachacuti and the Inca empire centred at its capital Cuzco.

The site was abandoned by the Inca shortly before Pizarro and the Spanish conquistadors arrived. The invaders never reached Machu Picchu, though, and the site would remain unknown to the wider world for 400 years.

Full Article by Mark Cartwright https://www.worldhistory.org/Machu_Picchu/

From UNESCO https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/274/

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

Financial Support to the Bearsite

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wmill@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many people get told they did amazing in an interview and then just don't get called? I don't feel bad if that's the case but idk if people just say that to let you off nicely.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They just say that to let you off nicely. It doesnt necessarily mean you did bad either, people hyperbolize a bit too much sometime. I'm sure you were good, but amazing should be reserved for like, hired on the spot, cancel all other interviews kinda situations.

[–] Wmill@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Makes sense at least I already have a pt lined up more inline with the field I wanna work in but a stable 40 hour job at higher than minimum wage would have been nice

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dunno the kind of work, but it probably goes even harder on the hyperbole in white collar stuff. Ive worked kitchens my whole life, which is generally a pretty blunt communication style cause you're going at a fast pace and need to convey information quickly and efficiently. So when everyone has the knowledge that we all make mistakes, saying "we gotta redo X dish, I shit the bed on this one" or while plating "sorry, need a redo on x, you fucked up a bit on (whatever is wrong with it).". Thay doesnt hurt my feelings. Someone trying to hard to spare my feelings does. Dont tell me im amazing and then never call back, have a fucking spine. Even front of house in a restaurant deals with that nonsense on a level I would have a rough time abiding. The owner told them to remember to be a 'Superteam' in the written nonsense she wrote up. That is soooo patronizing. Managers dont know how to treat people with respect so they do so on paper by treating people like children

[–] Wmill@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was for a groundskeeper position and all I really asked for was some tips for my next interviews tbh, blunty if they said practice with s friend more or in front of a mirror fair. Or if they said make more eye contact cool but when I don't got much to work on I'm left guessing

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

The best advice is to lie.