this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
533 points (98.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41087 readers
3261 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah I'm saying physicians shouldn't have MDs. They should have some other non-teaching physician qualification, or a PhD in medicine.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you have things backwards. PhDs are just proof of becoming an expert researcher in a field, and MDs are just proof of becoming a practitioner of medicine.

Some who get PhDs or MDs become teachers because of their proficiency, but the purpose of PhDs and MDs isn't to become teachers.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If the purpose of an MD isn't to be a teacher, why do they use the word doctor? Doctor means teacher. Pick a different word!

I'm staring to think MDs aren't actually doctors!

[–] ericwdhs@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we're putting effort into fixing how society uses words, can we work on flammable versus inflammable first? Then I vote for fixing the odd one out in the terrible, terrific, horrible, horrific quad. Then the split between awful and awe. Then...

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

can we work on flammable versus inflammable first?

no. also you missed horrid

[–] ericwdhs@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I didn't miss it. It just doesn't cleanly fit into this framework (imagine it as a square table instead of a list):

Horror + -ble = horrible (bad)
Horror + -ific = horrific (bad)
Terror + -ble = terrible (bad)
Terror + -ific = terrific (good)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm suggesting we need a terrid and it should have something to do with, um, fish.

[–] ericwdhs@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

Genius! Also, did you know "whale" comes from "large sea fish?" Ridiculous. Another one for the list.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're making a semantic argument, which is kinda useless because what you're suggesting wouldn't change anything substantially, just the language we use to describe it. People would still go to the same programs to get the same qualifications, they would just be called something different.

But language has inertia, and you're never going to get people to stop calling them doctors, no matter how much you insist that they're called "health engineers" or "A&P technicians" or whatever you come up with.

Why not focus on something else like the much-needed systemic reforms in healthcare; getting business interests out of the medical system; socializing and universalizing healthcare if you live in a backwater country like the US; making sure mental, vision, hearing, and dental are included in that; training enough medical professionals and opening enough clinics to reduce waitlists and ensure everyone has timely access to the care they need; updating standard practices to be consistent with cutting edge research (this is especially important in mental healthcare!); actually funding research to find effective treatments even if that means entrenched healthcare companies offering subpar options have to adapt or become obsolete; et cetera.

So many things to be concerned with that are more important than what we call the people with a medical degree...

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reforming the medical system is a pointless waste of time. We need to ban fossil fuels and animal agriculture. Animals are being slaughtered by the millions by factory farms. We shouldn't waste time improving the way we care for humans, when humans are already doing so much better than other creatures like cows and corals. It's a waste of effort to secure such marginal improvements for humans, when we can do so much more for animals.

Actually, never mind. Dismissing problems by comparing them to bigger problems, AKA whataboutism, doesn't actually make the world a better place. It doesn't increase effort spent on the big problems, it just reduces effort on the smaller ones and makes the world a worse place. I retract the above paragraph; medical care reform is important too, even if it's less impactful. And physicians calling themselves doctors, though relatively inconsequential, still annoys the crap out of Me.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

We need to do a lot of things. But I don't need to elucidate on that point because according to your second paragraph you already understand that.

There's a lot that needs to change about the world. It'll happen incrementally until it reaches critical mass to happen all at once. But breaking it up into separate domains and acting like we need to focus on one thing at a time is nonsense.

There are enough people in the world to divide things up according to expertise. Some people can work on reforming healthcare while others reform agriculture while others reform energy while others reform housing while others reform education while others reform whatever other sectors they're involved with. There's no need to put some sectors on hold until other sectors improve. That'll just create a bottleneck and stifle progress.

Some of these issues are interdependent anyway, and require simultaneous cross-sector reforms. For instance housing and agriculture reform depend on energy reform. Healthcare reforms depends on education reform. Honestly, it all depends on education reform. And possibly even electoral reform, which in turn also depends on education reform. But you can't reform education without also reforming housing, energy, agriculture, elections, etc.

The good news is we don't need to do things one at a time. To use a computer analogy, we're capable of parallel processing. Each sector is like a separate processor core, and each expert in a sector is like a separate thread in that core. We can do multi-threading, it's fine.

you mean like Nurse Practitioners?