this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
267 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

20710 readers
746 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ivan@piefed.social 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Infrasound. ~~Proven~~ Possible (>100dB is absolutely harmful though, lower levels are object of studies now and testing on humans yielded inconclusive results) negative impact on people's health and general wellbeing, waves travel quite far and have high penetration, and data centers are absolutely the source of it with all the fans and pumps.

Not saying that there 1:1 causation here, but having a data center around will absolutely make you miserable, and dizzy too.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

How far does that actually travel, and how does that compare to other bad stuff that has been around longer, like refineries or power substations or whatever?

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

data centres have been around for decades as well, I believe it's the new hyper scaler data centres that possibly have this infrasound thingo

But that's nothing related to a google trend graph of dizziness and data centres, that's as the OP says, random

These are great:

https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

[–] foo@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

Spurious shmurious! The causation here is clear: eating butter generates wind farms. Eat more butter to save the planet everyone! It's undeniable science!

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Dammit people would you stop commenting on Technology Connections videos? I can't afford it!

[–] erev@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

When datacenters are being powered by unregulated natural gas generators then it has a massive impact

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Where I live there's a refinery, about ten years ago they changed the burners on the tall torches for a new kind that burn apparently cleaner but they make a lot more noise. It is 6km away with no direct line of sight, the low pitch rumble makes some of the windows in my house rattle.

[–] Setiyeti93@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] neaptide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I’m a big Benn Jordan fan but he missed the mark on this one. See this detailed rebuttal. Sniping between the author and Jordan on Blue Sky aside, he makes a lot of good points about how the research does not show negative health impacts related to infrasound.

[–] ivan@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, you may have noticed that 5 GHz Wi-Fi has smaller coverage area than 2.4 GHz.

It works that way all the way down to infrasound, which is <20 Hz, and natural examples would be whale communications (thousands of kilometers) or volcano eruptions (infrasound wave from Krakatoa eruption lapped around entire globe multiple times).

As for human factors - basically any big industrial tech object is gonna be the source of ultrasound. So it's kind of safe to assume that infrasound from data centers may be "heard" from at least several kilometers away. Dunno how it compares to refineries and power substations - but they're also source of that.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

At night I could hear a train idle from a kilometer away through town easily. That was still in the audible range, not infrasound, and also it was literally just the engine idling, not the train being driven - not super loud even if standing next to it. A bit louder than a car.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Has it been proven? I see articles that suggest pathways or mechanisms.

But when I looked for a double blind study with controls, they do not find any effects at all. Arguably the majority of studies are around 8 hour periods or sleep period, not 24 hour exposure. But you would think they would find something. They did hearing tests, blood test, brain activity tests, and emotional response "feeling" scores. It just isnt there conclusively.

People started doing a lot of this research because of the wind turbines, which also are very loud, run as long as their is wind, and produce infrasound.

Don't get me wrong: I am not defending putting loud constant noise machines near people, this should be part of a zoning regulation. That seems bad enough, infrasound or not.

[–] rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Great video about this here

[–] neaptide@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Please cite sources for this claim? Infrasound has not been shown to have “proven negative impact.” That is fear-mongering on par with “wifi makes people sick.”