1764
internet points (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] torknorggren@lemm.ee 89 points 11 months ago

In my discipline we only pay if we want the article to be open access. Are there journals that charge $1000 and still put articles behind a paywall?

[-] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As far as I know, the big ones charge very high processing fees

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago

"Processing fees"

Ensuring the Docx file shows up right in PDF format.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Well except a lot of the time it's LaTeX, and the journal already makes the authors check their tex files work with the journal's article class.

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Depends entirely on the field. None of the (psych/behavior) journals I'm familiar with ask for things besides DOCX.

[-] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

I also don’t know how they come up with that BS

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I think in computer science it’s normal to have to attend a conference to present your paper if it’s accepted. And they charge a higher fee to presenters than to regular attendees.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

So the people providing the content that everyone shows up for get charged more, man that's a weird business model. Like running a cable network that charges channels to be on it.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it all comes around to how the funds are distributed.

Researcher gets grants from the federal government to enable their work. They do the work, write the paper, get it accepted to a conference. They're required to attend and present to get it published. So they have an excuse to buy flights, hotels, expense food all on government dime. And the conference is put on, in part, by other researchers, who aren't going to use their own funds to put on the event. So they charge people to attend, and those who want to get published have the largest incentive to attend, so they can be charged the most.

I only did 2 years of graduate research and attended a handful of conferences (unpublished unfortunately)... I could have this wrong, but I'm pretty sure this is the way, at least in the computer science field.

[-] Mana@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 11 months ago

It’s $3000 for Association of Horticultural Scientists

[-] _bac@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago
[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

High impact factor journal are among those that ask fees depending on number of pages and figures. Or at least they used to when I used to do academic research

[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago
[-] very_poggers_gay@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

Yup, I’ve got a paper that’s just about ready for submission, and if the journal accepts it for publication, we pay ~3k USD, so about $4k CAD.

[-] s0ykaf@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

i wonder if that keeps researchers from developing economies from becoming impactful, because $3k is like 15 months of a minimum wage in brazilian reais, and more than entire month's wages for 99.9% of our professors

edit: for the humanities this seems especially bad, it kind of makes it sure that western social thought remains dominant since only you guys can actually pay for it

[-] very_poggers_gay@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

Oh absolutely. It's a huge issue, especially in humanities and social sciences, where the barrier of entry makes it so that almost all published research is conducted by certain populations on themselves. Some people call it "WEIRD" populations, meaning western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (though that "weird" terminology is a bit stinky... I'm looking at the "E" and "D"). Interestingly, China has now overtaken the US in publishing the most highly cited research of any country, though I think their advances are mostly in natural sciences and engineering.

There are also issues with how we qualify good quality or *academic * research. Again, this is especially the case in social sciences and humanities where the standards have been set by colonial researchers who had the means to run expensive studies on large samples. As a result, a lot of research methodologies and ways of knowing that don't align with the western colonial standards (e.g., qualitative research, narrative analysis) get discounted or written off entirely

[-] someacnt@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Can confirm, I cannot even imagine paying for papers. Like why do you endure such an issue?

..Predatory journals?

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1764 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

10340 readers
1379 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS