this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
86 points (97.8% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14361 readers
609 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

carbrain is "this is the fault of 3 million parallel, separated, individual actors" a lot

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rule of thumb: I'm gonna go as slow as I want 😎

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Both time to react and impact absorbed by your brain and body are highly dependent on velocity. Cars should not be going faster than 70 mph. The only reason speed limits allow it is carbrain lobbying.

[–] whiskers165@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Driving less than 70 mph on a highway in the Atlanta metro will have people angrily tailgating you and aggressively passing in the right lane.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 days ago

Yeah that's been true in every state I've driven in. Statesians are hopelessly carbrained.

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There's no highways near me that allow speeds like that damn

The autobahn has no speed limit at all.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Highway limits get as high as 85 mph in some US states.

[–] Omegamint@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

First time I drove on one of these it scared the shit out of me. Like now the ceiling is 85, so the people speeding are going faster than that and it’s terrifying. I’m not a bad driver either, done a lot of jobs that involve driving and I have a spotless record. Those speeds are just stupid

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Worst is Texas where it has 85mph roads in areas where the roads are still going through towns.

You basically get up to 85 and then hit the next town so have to slow down again while those behind you are upset you aren't flooring it each time

[–] BGDelirium@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ok that settles it. Never going to Texas

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You should go just so you can witnesses the Katy freeway

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 5 points 2 days ago

Even better is if it's during the few times they have winter weather or heavy rain cause in both cases the roads end up having 0 traction as they never add drainage.

So it becomes a question of will you get hit trying to stay at a reasonable speed for the conditions or hit by texans not being able to control their massive vehicles as they drive the same no matter the conditions

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Poland is 87 mph on the highways (140 kph)

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 days ago

And the going "wisdom" is you're allowed to go 8-10 mph over the limit.

[–] THEPH0NECOMPANY@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are some very long stretches of highway in the US that see little to no traffic so it's not that big of an issue.

When I was moving cross country I had to drive through some empty states where I could drive for over an hour without seeing someone else.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've driven tens of thousands of miles back and forth across the country, often through fields or desert with no cars visible for miles. Going over 70 is still pointless.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For a 1,000 mile trip, driving 85 instead of 70 can save 2.5 hours. That’s a pretty compelling reason to do it when the road is perfectly straight and flat for most of that journey.

The increased fuel consumption and reduced ability to avoid animals would be bigger concerns to me than personal safety

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So it takes 12 hours instead of 14 hours?? That's not a compelling reason lol. And you have to use a 1,000 mile road trip as an example to make the time "saved" approach significance.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The comment thread is about β€œvery long stretches of highway in the US that see little to no traffic” and 1,000 is a round number. It’s not that outlandish to drive that far in the US especially if you count round-trip distance.

Saving 2.5 hours of boredom evidently is compelling, that’s why people do it.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 days ago

The comment thread started with me saying I've driven tens of thousands of miles back and forth across the country. Which is why I'm laughing at the claim that quadrupling the risk for a marginal time savings doesn't make sense.

Carbrained Statesians don't make rational decisions.

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 days ago

Also tend to be the ones with worst drivers and largest vehicles. cough texas