this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

History

24029 readers
32 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Look, i agree with that criticism, i've just been over all of these problems with little miss truscum in the last contrapoints hate thread we had two days ago, but i don't think that's why you people are so obsessed with her. Hexbear has, to give one example, zero qualms constantly riding the dick of openly transphobic anti-woke crank Norman Finkelstein, so if you people can tolerate that anti-BDS, anti-black, misogynist piece of shit but can't tolerate a piece of shit who is transfeminized, i know what's the actual problem.

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think people who think Arabs are human beings dislike her because she doesn't think Arabs are human beings, actually.

[–] 389aaa@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And of course all the posts about Contra's various ancient bad takes are relevant to that, right? Posting about her shit takes on Marie Antoinette from almost half a decade ago?

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yup. People do the same for Hasan. He constantly says things that ragebait people so they do way weirder unrelated things like pretend he's a dog torturer. You're just implying that pro-palestinian people are transphobes, even more so than zionists. Which is just very strange.

[–] moss_icon@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're just implying that pro-palestinian people are transphobes, even more so than zionists

How do you even come to this conclusion

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Try reading the thread, I guess. Or like, the rest of the comment you're quoting.

[–] moss_icon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Literally nothing they have said implies such a thing 🤷‍♀️

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It absolutely does. If the slop-posting of other e-celebs by other communities is not due to transphobia, but anti-zionist people posting her Islamophobic rants is.....

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have literally been told itt that being a transphobe is ok as long as you are anti-genocide (specifically, anti-genocide but still pro zionism like Finkelstein).

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Cool, I'm not really responsible for what other people say. That doesn't mean anti-genocide people are transphobes.

Like, what is the point of responding if you're going to ignore the entire comment you're replying to?

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could stop responding. Would be better at this point, honestly. You're already making up strawmen like "you claim that anti-genocide people are transphobes" when nobody said anything like that anywhere. I brought up the example to prove that yes, we do have transmisogynists like @Biddles@hexbear.net on here and they go mask off every time you poke them a little.

My point isn't to defend Natalie's takes on Gaza, not only because they are indefensible but because her position on the genocide isn't even the topic of this thread, it wasn't the topic of the last contrapoints hate thread three days ago either, it is barely ever brought up in spite of the fact that we collectively tear into her twice a week. My point is that the excessive focus on her is a symptom of hexbears' transmisogyny problem that nobody except the trans women on this site is ever willing to adress. Stop making up excuses for what is obviously transmisogyny, stop telling trans women that we cannot tell it's transmisogyny.

You even go out of your way and say "this is the same as people making up lies about Hasan's dog." You openly admit that this has reached the point of character assassination where it doesn't even matter anymore if an accusation is completely fabricated. and where the original problem that made somebody an acceptable target is now only trotted out as a flimsy after-the-fact justification. How am i supposed to treat somebody who thinks that kind of behavior is not only normal, but perfectly acceptable?

[–] moss_icon@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hexbear has a serious casual transphobia problem. This isn’t even the only time it’s happened in the past couple of months, there was all the denial of Lilly Bushnell’s gender as well. Claiming that someone’s transphobia is acceptable just because they oppose genocide is honestly deplorable.

I really wish the admins would address it as it is one of the main things holding Hexbear back.

Yeah, i've been reminded of that as well. And honestly, it's the same as with hexbear's misogyny problem, hexbear's ableism problem or hexbear being really weird about (especially queer) sexuality and relationships, probably also applies to racism although i can't personally attest to that - when somebody from another instance does it, it's an instant ban, when an old account from hexbear does it, the post may get removed and maybe there's a temp ban when it's really blatant as in this case with the "having good takes on Gaza gives you a transphobia license" shit, but that's it, and there's never any reflection. Every time, a ton of affected comrades complain that this is, indeed, a problem while a ton of not affected comrades deny and downplay everything, make up excuses and refuse to learn and do better.

[–] 389aaa@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

I am in no way implying that, fuck head, don't Ziojacket me.

Am I criticizing the slop posting of her Islamophobic rants right now, jackass? I specifically referenced the various posts about her old bad takes like THIS VERY POST we're commenting on.

This is in such unfathomable bad faith, I really hope this website actually cracks down on transmisogyny one day.

[–] I_Voxgaard@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I recognize your position but I really think people here are fixated on Natalie because she is a propagandist for the bourgeoisie, not because she is a transwoman. I mean the megathread at this very moment is celebrating a transwoman who is on the "right side of history".

[–] bunnossin@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

There are hundreds of bourgeois propagandists. That's not an answer.

the megathread at this very moment is celebrating a transwoman who is on the "right side of history".

Yes. The trans megathread. Also, "transwoman" cringe

[–] DwigtRortugal@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago
[–] SwitchyandWitchy@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hexbear is the best place on lemmyverse for trans people because that's an incredibly low bar to clear, as it is in so many other places online and irl. Even before the Contrapoints posting this week there was already a thread on that mega in response to another incident lamenting the fact that we can't even trust our cis hexbear comrades to not post transphobia. But at least in that case, he learned and apologized instead of posting excuses through it all.

Also the reason you're getting clowned on for "transwoman" is that the spelling is used to distance us from womanhood and put us into a third gender category. Please use trans woman going forward.

[–] CharlieTheOctopus@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didnt know there was a delineation between the two terms, so this thread has been informative for me. thank yall for teaching me something stalin-approval

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, the trans megathread features a trnas woman, that must mean the site is fine with us. Nah, sorry, it takes a bit more to convince me when some stupid motherfucker just openly told me that people get a transphobia pass as long as they are against genociding more important minorities.

[–] boboblaw@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

TC69 cultural revolution when?

you people are so obsessed

i pay no attention to her except for some of the time she's posted on here.

i won't defend the critical flaws of Finkelstein or Mearschimer etc, they get positive engagement when they say correct things or clown on people we don't like. maybe natalie should try saying something correct and heterodox about geopolitics or make an original dunk on somebody relevant?

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

anti-woke crank Norman Finkelstein, so if you people can tolerate that anti-BDS, anti-black, misogynist piece of shit but can't tolerate a piece of shit who is transfeminized, i know what's the actual problem.

Jesus, that’s really harsh, I really can’t recall Finkelstein saying something seriously problematic about trans or black people. Open to evidence that he is, I just have never seen that side of him. I know he mocks woke or w/e but I haven’t heard anything too bad

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's very openly transphobic and has mocked Angela Davis in the past.

[–] boboblaw@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

I knew about the transpobia, but daaaang, also racist and mysoginistic? I haven't seen much of his stuff but how does this get swept under the rug?