this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
574 points (94.4% liked)

Fuck AI

6991 readers
1151 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 69 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

And the beauty of this stance is that it's literally impossible to disprove, so you never have to be wrong.

Of course the problem is that you as the claimant have burden of proof.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll do you one better by just using logic. There is no more work needed for blinding lasers, you can pick up a battery powered IR setup for a few hundred dollars and strap it to a rifle, done. Recomb DNA actually is still being studied, allow me to gesture very broadly to ALL the shit we do with yeast and I dated a girl working with M. Maydis for treating breast cancer.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If AI can only be done in such secrecy that it's impossible to disprove then I'd call that a win.

[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah literally just let us have some peace and quiet before we’re suddenly turned into paper clips

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Best incremental game btw

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course the problem is that you as the claimant have burden of proof.

People who say this kind of thing about claims regarding government or industry-level activities have no clue about security classifications.

How are you supposed to provide proof for something that is being deliberately withheld from the public?

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You're not. The problem isn't just that they're not supplying proof. It's that they're making assertions without supplying proof.

It is the pairing that is toxic.

The person to whom I responded said this flatly:

None are paused tho.

That is a bold, positive claim made with a very certain voice. And precisely because there is no way to verify this, it is impossible to prove or disprove. Which places it fully in the realm of unsupported speculation.

Had there been some form of tempering, clearly identifying it as opinion or speculation, then I'd have no problem with it.

LOL, they probably haven't paused any of it, though. I mean like they'd tell us if they were!

There's an example. See the difference?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I've got a blinding laser in my CD burner.

Allegedly, a Dr in China was already creating designer babies, and recombinant DNA products exist (and therefore, the research to create those products is being done.) Hell, I've done my own recombinant DNA experiments in my bio labs during college.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

The files basically confessed

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not a particular fan of AI but I'm not naive enough to believe that research would stop just because everyone claimed it had.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The kind of "AI" involved here (LLMbeciles and other such degenerative AI forms) are difficult to do in secret given, you know, the massive server racks with an extreme thirst for power and water they involve...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The world is full of data centres who's to say what their purpose is. How are you going to verify other nations compliance.

There is no scenario in which this genie is getting put back in the bottle

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 weeks ago

There is no answering the conspiracy mindset.

By which I mean the American one.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

was not the original claim that they were paused? why is it always the claim that you disagree with that has the burden of proof, not the original claim?