this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
574 points (94.4% liked)

Fuck AI

6991 readers
1151 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course the problem is that you as the claimant have burden of proof.

People who say this kind of thing about claims regarding government or industry-level activities have no clue about security classifications.

How are you supposed to provide proof for something that is being deliberately withheld from the public?

[โ€“] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You're not. The problem isn't just that they're not supplying proof. It's that they're making assertions without supplying proof.

It is the pairing that is toxic.

The person to whom I responded said this flatly:

None are paused tho.

That is a bold, positive claim made with a very certain voice. And precisely because there is no way to verify this, it is impossible to prove or disprove. Which places it fully in the realm of unsupported speculation.

Had there been some form of tempering, clearly identifying it as opinion or speculation, then I'd have no problem with it.

LOL, they probably haven't paused any of it, though. I mean like they'd tell us if they were!

There's an example. See the difference?