this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
266 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

19630 readers
1991 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I'm only down with the "Pluto is a planet" crowd, if they rep Ceres and at least one of the others (Eris, Hamuhea, Makemake, or one of the others I forget) too.

So there's no version of the solar system where there's only 9 planets. It's 11+ lads.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, people don't realise that removing Pluto is the conservative choice when it comes to the list of planets.

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 5 points 21 hours ago

It was the only choice if we are expecting elementary students to memorize them all in order.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Eros na gonya be on dis list no more, pampaw

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Eros Venus now, sasa?

[–] 5715@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

If Sol has a ring now, is it married?

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

The more the merrier

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world -2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'd be happy with:

Pluto = planet

Anything smaller than Pluto ≠ planet

Nine planets. Now with clear non-stupid rules.

[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The arbitrary cutoff size being to ensure continuity of the scientific consensus in popular awareness when I was a child isn't a stupid rule.

Not even when a larger kuiper belt object is found.

Not even, when since mass is the primary means of estimating size until we fly a probe out there, we estimate a smaller but much with much more mass object to be larger and we debate a 10th planet yet again.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Hey, if we find something bigger than Pluto, then by all means let's call it a planet.

By any reasonable person's definition of a planet, Pluto is a planet. It's a rocky spherical mass that orbits the sun, with a varied terrain of mountains, plains and glaciers. It has days and seasons. It has its own system of moons.

An additional grievance I have is that, by the IAU's stupid definition of a Dwarf Planet, Charon should really be called a dwarf planet too. It isn't a satellite of Pluto in a meaningful sense - both Pluto and Charon orbit a point between them. The other moons also orbit this space between Charon and Pluto.

So, want to know why it isn't a Dwarf Planet? Because the IAU class it as a planetary satellite. What's the formal definition of a planetary satellite then? There isn't one. It was discussed, but a formal definition was not decided upon. Charon is literally a moon now because it was called a moon before the definition of a planet was changed and dwarf planets were invented.

I'm all for formal definitions, but the IAUs current rules are just really sloppy. It's maddening.