this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
91 points (96.0% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

6855 readers
585 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SNW s1e6 "Lift Us Where Suffering Cannot Reach"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I thoroughly enjoyed this episode (besides the flagrant OSHA violations obvi!). I was already into SNW but this, finally, was a real moral quandary for Pike. Do you "allow" this civilization to use this technology that they don't really understand but believe is necessary, leaving a child in an unknown level of suffering, or do you "rescue" the child from that suffering?

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

or do you “rescue” the child from that suffering?

Thus condemning an entire civilization to literal collapse. Pike's look of resignation and disappointment just before he beams away is chilling.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

it's one of those trolley problems made to put a mirror on our society. not only there isn't a right answer, but to find one misses the point.

I highly recommend you read the actual source material by U.K. LeGuin "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas".

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No, collapsing a society based on child suffering is good actually. Go vegan today.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

he meant literally collapsing a society. as in, their foating cities would crash into a river of lava.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I simply wouldn't have made my floating cities above a river of lava depend on a childs suffering. Complete skill issue

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

it was their ancient ancestors that built the city. entire planet lava. they were looking for alternatives but couldn't find any. you... understand that this is fiction, right?

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

oh okay i wasn't familiar with that one. reminds me of an IASIP scene lol.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

then will you collapse our society? which relies on much more child suffering??

why am I asking? this is Lemmy, I'm sure you already have the matches to burn it all up

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

pretty sure our society is gonna collapse soon. Capitalism is nearing it's end.

i wish. any moment now

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

going vegan doesn't stop child suffering

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

yes it does, a lot of cows need to give birth to produce milk for example

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

that has nothing to do with child suffering. and going vegan doesn't stop dairy production anyway.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Someone mentioned it in another comment. I was surprised to not have heard of it before now. It's on the list.

it's like 2 pages. put it at the top of the list and get it done

It's like two pages and a powerful metaphor that gave me a good push towards veganism.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

that would be a pretty extreme trolley problem hahaha. did you learn ethics from michael? "kill one child, or kill an entire civilization. tick tock!"

(just kidding! i agree that the point is that there isn't an answer")

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

not sure if the story predates the trolley problem (definitely predates its memification), but yhea, it can be abstracted into a trolley problem.

the story also asks to look at all the suffering which out society relies on and asks us why aren't we leaving it if we choose to leave Omelas

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

someone mentioned that it's only a few pages long so I'm gonna try and read it as soon as i can get my hands on a copy.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

https://shsdavisapes.pbworks.com/f/Omelas.pdf

it's available online. it's a good read, 30 minutes read 2 hours of digesting it afterwards

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 12 hours ago

Cool! Gonna go make some coffee, read this then watch the video someone linked further up. 👍

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was that ever established? I remember having the impression that this was some ancient technology they had just always used and didn't necessarily understand. Somewhat like that society in TNG with the planetary cloaking shield that was slowly killing them all.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just the visual of the orange lines connecting from the platforms to the machine. Other than that, we have to extrapolate from the dialogue:

The machine needs the neural network of a child to function. Our founders designed it that way. We don't know why.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Presumably because they read The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas!

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago

why would you re-traumatize me like this

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That does appear to be much more than coincidence. Strange that it never came up for me in school aside from the usual dystopian readings (1984, The Giver, Island, Fahrenheit 451, etc.).

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought it was the worst episode of the first season. Yeah, it technically poses a moral dilemma, but it doesn’t do anything with it. The truth of the matter isn’t revealed until the very end, so there’s no time for anything other than Pike abruptly giving up and walking away from it. No exploring alternatives or grappling for clever solutions, just… giving up.

That’s my recollection, anyway — haven’t watched it since it came out.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thats a fair critique for sure. I may have been a bit starved for classic Trek by the time this aired 😂 . I dont think it was the WORST episode though. I'd probably vote for the orion episode as worst of season 1...

edit: thinking about it more, i think the main "point" of the story was that sometimes the best intentions simply aren't enough. no matter how much starfleet might try to impose their moral viewpoint on other cultures, there will be no-win scenarios with no good answer. you just have to learn how to live with the guilt of not being able to save everyone.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dont think it was the WORST episode though. I’d probably vote for the orion episode as worst of season 1…

I can see that. Personally, “Pike cooks himself out of a bad situation and then pirate-speaks on the bridge for fun” is all gold, but that’s clearly a matter of how high your tolerance for very dumb humour is…

It’s entirely possible I’ll see more value in “Lift Us…” when I rewatch the series. I hope so!

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I think I get what they were trying to do with bringing back the camp of the original series but it was a bit too much for me. That said, I didn't mind their version of a "holodeck" episode! (the elysian kingdom)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i disagree with your "it doesn't do anything with it" critique tho. not everything needs resolution. it's a retelling of a classic le guin. there's no resolution in the le guin either.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I love episodes with no neat resolution, like DS9's In The Pale Moonlight or TNG's Journey's End. But episodes like that are about the struggle with the unresolvable problem. We watch the show's respective captains grapple with and debate the problem for the whole episode.

This episode is mostly a mystery about what the situation with the planet might be. It poses it's dilemma at the end and then immediately throws up its hands.

And honestly, my recollection is that the "unresolvability" is less than there's no conceivable way this society could carry on without child torture, and more that the prime directive means this is all outside of Federation jurisdiction. Which feels more like moral abdication than a real ethical dilemma.

I think there's lots of reasons Le Guin's story works for me when this doesn't, but a big one is that there's no heroic "captain" figure. It's about making the reader face their own complicity in unethical societal structures. I don't feel pushed to do that with SNW because I'm busy yelling at Pike about what he should do, not looking inward.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 12 hours ago

Which feels more like moral abdication than a real ethical dilemma.

this is like the core of federation society haha. they wouldn't be able to live with themselves if they couldn't handwave things away with the prime directive.