this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
377 points (91.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38214 readers
4240 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is the most 90s image I have seen in a long time.

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Good job clanker, another human fooled successfully. See the watermark in the bottom right.

[–] diskremover@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wanna cry man, I wanna cry. HOW LONG do i have to ask myself "Is this AI?" whenever I see an image on internet?

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Always from now on, it won't end. And I think it's a good example here, as it's clearly indicated with the watermark. Without it I wouldn't have been sure, this image is very good quality. My clues were the calendar is too conveniently place at the perfect location, and I tried to figure out which win version is that, and the thickness of the header of the warning dialog seems too thick compared to the taskbar. Then I started to look for other clues and noticed the watermark

I'm not a luddite, this technology has some good uses, and this is an important step in the good direction that they add a watermark. Next should be an ai notice added to the metadata of the image, so the hosting site could understand it and mark as such, and users can filter it.

Bad actors obviously could remove any kind of watermark or metadata, so this wouldn't help against them, but as we see how it goes with drm there is no perfect way to make sure the slop can be always marked as such.

[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

The crazy thing about the calendar is that it’s right. A year ago, I wouldn’t have even expected an AI generated image to get the correct number of days in a week, but not only does it get that right, but it correctly shows that March has 31 days and that March 1999 started on a Monday.

The placement isn’t that much of a giveaway either. Five or ten years before this hypothetical photo, that desk would have been just a desk, which is exactly where you’d have put a calendar. Old habits die hard, and I definitely knew people who still hung calendars next to their computer desk.

It’s only going to continue to get harder to tell.

[–] JiffyBag@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's a good example here, as it's clearly indicated with the watermark.

Define "clearly" 😅 it took a while for you and I to notice the watermark and over half the commenters still believe this is a real image.

My clues were ... then I started to look for other clues and noticed the watermark

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It's a new thing, my eyes haven't got used to it yet. I see more ai images without any watermark than with one.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago

They even got the shadow on the wall from the camera flash...

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago

Fuck me... I only started looking more closely after your comment and noticed that the room's proportions are fucked up. But, at a first glance, it looks like a photo from the 90s...

[–] hesh@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

March 1999, based on the wall calendar

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks more like 1958 to me, the whole thing is a blur. Doesn't seem like a compression thing, more like AI generation.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Given that she's holding what is the second most booty-ass rendition of what's apparently supposed to be a Beretta Model 92 I've seen in my life, AI generation seems to be a fair assessment.

Edit: And the shadow on it makes no sense. Never mind the watermark in the corner.

Edit edit: And March 1998 began on a Sunday. The more you look the worse it all gets.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

i love this deep dive lol

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

It also has the AI watermark in the bottom right corner. This one doesn't take a rocket surgeon to pinpoint.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] hesh@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

I initially thought 1998, but March 1 wasn't on Monday that year.